Nov 2023 Mod notice:
There may be other, more specific, threads about some aspects of US politics, but this one tends to act as a hub for all sorts of related news and information, so it's usually one of the busiest OTC threads.
If you're new to OTC, it's worth reading the Introduction to On-Topic Conversations
and the On-Topic Conversations debate guidelines
before posting here.
Rumor-based, fear-mongering and/or inflammatory statements that damage the quality of the thread will be thumped. Off-topic posts will also be thumped. Repeat offenders may be suspended.
If time spent moderating this thread remains a distraction from moderation of the wiki itself, the thread will need to be locked. We want to avoid that, so please follow the forum rules
when posting here.
In line with the general forum rules, 'gravedancing' is prohibited here. If you're celebrating someone's death or hoping that they die, your post will get thumped. This rule applies regardless of what the person you're discussing has said or done.
Edited by Mrph1 on Nov 30th 2023 at 11:03:59 AM
While Sanders is making some mistakes here I think he's got quite a long downwards fall to make before he's anywhere near as bad as Trump.
In any case, let's remember that he's been an official Independent for most of his career. Just because he's spent much of that time caucusing with Democrats doesn't mean he's all that invested in the wellness of Democrats as a party.
@Ilovedogs: What horrible things? The deportations??? Because right now that's the worst thing I can think about on a record that's generally considered pretty dang good by leftist standards: Accomplishing healthcare, supporting same sex marriage, getting the economy out of recession.
edited 17th May '16 8:39:33 PM by AceofSpades
I don't support everything Obama has done, but on the whole, his presidency has been a huge success. Even Obamacare alone is a major achievement, even ignoring that it was accomplished in the face of unprecedented obstructionism.
The next time you get sad about drones or TPP or whatever, just remember that tens of millions of people now have access to healtchare.
Blind Final Fantasy 6 Let's PlayI will admit that I wanted to at least check other acceptable sources before getting angry at Sanders, and wished to at least make a clarification. That being said, I don't think I'm happy with the Sanders Camp at the moment.
edited 17th May '16 8:47:24 PM by GameGuruGG
Wizard Needs Food Badly![]()
I would like to note that the drones thing drives me nuts. Not necessarily because people are wrong to complain about collateral damage—they're not—but because too many of the people I've met seem to think that this is somehow new.
It's not. And like it or not, drone strikes are a hell of a lot less likely to incur collateral damage than similar strikes by aeroplanes, or god forbid, strategic bombing, the latter of which produces tens of thousands of excess casualties. Targeted assassinations by people on the ground tend to leave an excess bodycount as well, given that almost inevitably people other than the guy you are after get in the way.
So if you want to oppose America targeting people for termination, go ahead. If you want to oppose anything and everything that might produce collateral damage, go ahead. For the love of all that's holy, stop acting like drones are some new and especially horrible way of making war. They're not.
edited 17th May '16 8:48:25 PM by AmbarSonofDeshar
You guys are awere the Sanders campaign did condem violence (was there any, I'd only heard about harassment and death threats) and harassment right? Them doing so is right there in the article, the statement Sanders made personally focused on other stuff by considering Reid strait up said that Sanders had said to him that he condemns it and that Sanders didn't write the statement that he read out I'm not sure where this "Sanders endorses violence" thing is coming from.
Now what does seem to be clear is that Sanders has his priorities rather out of whack at the moment, he may consider condemning harassment and addressing intuitional problems both things to be done but he's giving moe focus to the later, which I can understand people being pissed about.
X3 Well look at that, he literally condemed the violence and the press just cut that part of his statement. so much for him not condemning things. This is why people distrust the press, they aid that Sanders didn't condem the actions despite the fact that that's literally the first thing he said.
edited 17th May '16 8:51:58 PM by Silasw
“And the Bunny nails it!” ~ Gabrael “If the UN can get through a day without everyone strangling everyone else so can we.” ~ CyranIts not just the violence for me though. Its how he focuses almost entirely on the idea that "money is causing racism and homophobia and every other problem" when that isn't necessarily true. Its how he keeps acting as though Hillary's victories are illegitimate. Its how he keeps pushing the idea that we need a revolution, whichh makes me very uncomfortable.
X5 Only if you want it to, he said that violence was bad and that people shouldn't do it. But honestly the people there seem to have had a legit reason to be pissed. It's like when people insist you have to condem violence after riots due to racial issues with policing. Yes the violence has to be condemed and it is, but is it relay that bad for someone to explain that maybe the people who got screwed (be they folks trying to vote or black propel trying to not get shot randomly) kinda have a legit reason to be passed.
X4 The laser focus on economic issues I get, the "Hillary wins aren't legitimate" is his crazier supports not him, as for his use of the word revolution, meh, that's a personal thing and I can see why it might make a person nervous.
X2 High level election rigging has probably done a lot more damage then a few thrown chairs.
edited 17th May '16 9:06:21 PM by Silasw
“And the Bunny nails it!” ~ Gabrael “If the UN can get through a day without everyone strangling everyone else so can we.” ~ CyranSure it's not justified, but just like when black areas riot due to racial issues with police it's worth understanding what's pushed people to this point. One can try to understand without excusing.
Also a thrown chair if it's not throw st someone is just property damage. I've still not got a clear picture of what actually happened. Thought he death threats and harassment are plenty to be going on with.
edited 17th May '16 9:09:26 PM by Silasw
“And the Bunny nails it!” ~ Gabrael “If the UN can get through a day without everyone strangling everyone else so can we.” ~ CyranI don't think that ramming through the votes was a good idea, but it's hard to tell if it actually affected anything rules wise.
Blind Final Fantasy 6 Let's Play@Ilovedogs: He's done what he can, against great opposition. You can feel sick all you want, but that doesn't change what can be done as a practical matter. Even the president is just one person. They can do a whole freaking hell of a lot, but they can't get it done all on their own. So blaming the whole "not getting enough done" on environmental factors solely on Obama is shortsighted. And for the deportations: he's also in support of the DREA Mers act, and is trying to make immigration easier and help those who've been here since they were little children and had no choice because their parents brought them to gain citizenship. I've heard nothing that suggests Clinton wants to reverse position on these issues.
Don't let that queesy feeling cause you to place the blame where it doesn't belong, is what I'm saying.
[
What in the blazes of hell are you blabbing about? Rigging an election in the USA is not only next to impossible, but completely pointless if not counterproductive.
I just can't take these claims of "fraud" seriously.
edited 17th May '16 9:35:10 PM by TacticalFox88
New Survey coming this weekend!
Actual US elections sure, but DWS has been behind a ton of shady shit for the entire primary, all of it entirely unneeded, as Clinton is clearly the preferred candidate by the majority anyway.
Um, a few people have been claiming that some of Sanders' wins occur because of independents voting in the Democratic primaries. Including independents that may have nefarious motives, such as Republican voters who may be aiming at disrupting the Dem nomination process.
"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard Feynman
If you are going to claim this then can't you also claim that Donald Trump was also voted by Democratic voters wanting to disrupt the Republican nomination process? After all, Trump's done the best with Independents among Republican candidates from what I've heard.

edited 17th May '16 8:38:11 PM by kkhohoho