Nov 2023 Mod notice:
There may be other, more specific, threads about some aspects of US politics, but this one tends to act as a hub for all sorts of related news and information, so it's usually one of the busiest OTC threads.
If you're new to OTC, it's worth reading the Introduction to On-Topic Conversations
and the On-Topic Conversations debate guidelines
before posting here.
Rumor-based, fear-mongering and/or inflammatory statements that damage the quality of the thread will be thumped. Off-topic posts will also be thumped. Repeat offenders may be suspended.
If time spent moderating this thread remains a distraction from moderation of the wiki itself, the thread will need to be locked. We want to avoid that, so please follow the forum rules
when posting here.
In line with the general forum rules, 'gravedancing' is prohibited here. If you're celebrating someone's death or hoping that they die, your post will get thumped. This rule applies regardless of what the person you're discussing has said or done.
Edited by Mrph1 on Nov 30th 2023 at 11:03:59 AM
![]()
![]()
![]()
Depends at what stage of the election where in.
If it happens before the primary is over, then Sanders is practically guaranteed the nomination. If it happens after Hillary has won the nomination, then the Dems are in uncharted water.
edited 2nd May '16 3:01:01 PM by Demonic_Braeburn
Any group who acts like morons ironically will eventually find itself swamped by morons who think themselves to be in good company.Right. These are documented facts. It's not dismissive to call a black kettle black, or an avowed white supremacist a white supremacist.
edited 2nd May '16 3:35:56 PM by Fighteer
"It's Occam's Shuriken! If the answer is elusive, never rule out ninjas!"Sorry to ask this, but could someone tell me where I could find an article where Cruz goes full-on fundie? I'm writing a paper for my ethics class, and I need something to help lay the foundation.
Oh God! Natural light!
Here's a good one. http://www.advocate.com/election/2016/4/22/everything-you-need-know-about-ted-cruzs-transphobic-attack-ad-video
edited 2nd May '16 3:58:29 PM by Demonic_Braeburn
Any group who acts like morons ironically will eventually find itself swamped by morons who think themselves to be in good company.lets start with his open and willing association and support of Nazi level homophobia.... http://www.nytimes.com/2015/11/16/opinion/campaign-stops/ted-cruz-and-the-anti-gay-pastor.html?_r=0
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/michelangelo-signorile/post_10496_b_8544540.html
edited 2nd May '16 3:55:52 PM by FieldMarshalFry
advancing the front into TV TropesHere's another good one. http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/politics/2016/02/ted_cruz_just_turned_drafting_women_into_the_military_into_a_wedge_issue.html
Assuming Donald Trump wins the Republican nomination, there is one thing that does need to be addressed. A third of the Electoral College is still going to go to Donald Trump, and that's assuming every swing state goes Democrat.
edited 2nd May '16 4:00:05 PM by GameGuruGG
Wizard Needs Food Badly![]()
![]()
Ah, yes. That's actually the incident I was thinking of, but I didn't know what to look for.
Thanks guys, those should do just fine.
edited 2nd May '16 4:00:53 PM by KarkatTheDalek
Oh God! Natural light!Trump is the Devil's jester who decided to sit in his chair one day while he was out shopping.
"It's Occam's Shuriken! If the answer is elusive, never rule out ninjas!"hmm... Trump is older... I think that may make him The First of the Fallen
advancing the front into TV TropesTrump's main real path to victory is basically if:
- 1. A massive scandal breaks out for Hillary (not a faux scandal)
- 2. She gets charged for criminal charges for something
- 3. Something destroys her reputation
1 and 3 are basically the same thing arguably. But basically it'd have to be something that discredits her entire political career.
Or she killed a person.
And expect Trump and Roger Stone to hammer on the fact the DNC and the Clinton Foundation both look an awful lot like money laundering for Clintons and friends.
Which isn't helped for the fact Hillary, unlike her husband, is a lot weaker on personal Charisma, and for varying reasons has this perpetual air of Nixonian sleaze. Where even if she isn't doing anything wrong (or outside the limits of the law), she constantly gives off this very constant sense of seediness and corruption and sleaze. Which is why the Sachs speeches and the E-Mails remain Millstones that continue to dog her.
Only for those preconditioned to look for it.
She is the second disliked U.S. Presidential candidate in history going into an election, behind Trump.
40% of people being polled disliking her is abnormal.
Again. The reason they stick, is she sucks at brushing off scandals, i.e. Low Charisma. Bill was able to brush aside most of his scandals, because he had a better sense (or better team) with handling "bullshit". Hillary doesn't. She's bad at sidestepping curveballs and causing herself more grief than she needs (see the Nancy Reagan thing being an example of this).
And even if you think it's bullshit, after the DNC, we're going to hear non-stop:
- Poor handling of Bengzhai as Secretary of State
- Whitewater II: Hillary Edition
- Hillary, weak on rape, because her husband might of raped women
- "So what did she say behind closed doors to Goldman Sachs???"
- "Clinton Foundation: Money Laundering Machine??? Or Pay-To-Play Scam Charity? YOU DECIDE!"
- "Hillary Clinton thinks she's above the law so much she can have a private E-Mail server for government communication she wasn't authorized by the NSA to have"
And even if it sounds like bullshit, that's what's going to be blaring on TV, Radio and Social Media for the next 5-6 months afterwards. And it will raise eyebrows for low information voters and give more red meat to Republicans than is probably needed, than say, if Biden had been picked.
edited 2nd May '16 4:52:31 PM by PotatoesRock
Obama got plenty of garbage tossed at him for months; and he still won despite being up against a far more effective opponent than Cruz or Trump would be to Clinton.
Most of the people who buy into all that stuff won't vote Democrat anyway, and anyone with some misgivings against Clinton (who is still remotely moderate/progressive) will just vote against her opponent if nothing else.
Politics is the skilled use of blunt objects.Bat, I think you're overestimating drastically how much the average person gives a shit about the TPP, or can even name what it's about, let alone the stuff about the internet within that deal. Internet activism aside, there's plenty of people who don't give a shit about that. Just as there's plenty of people who don't give a shit about the whole email thing, or the Goldman Sachs speeches, or that think she handled the Benghazi thing pretty well.
The real test is coming up, and that's how she handles Trump one on one on the debate stage. And I have to say, I'm both anticipating this and very nervous.
And the fact of the matter is, demographics overwhelmingly favor Clinton. Pretty much the only demographic that consistently votes conservative is "older white males". Younger people, minorities, and women all tend Democratic. The problem for Democrats is that younger people and minorities are also much less likely to actually vote than older white people. But presidential elections tend to be the exception, as if someone's going to vote for anything, they'll vote for president.
Barring an inherently-unforeseeable October Surprise, Hillary is almost certain to win.
Really from Jupiter, but not an alien.I think your all underestimating Trump. He didn't get this far without a certain cunning and good political instincts. He may be a mediocre, at best business man, he is a brilliant showman. And now he is putting on the biggest show of his life. Christ they should sell the plot of this election to HBO. I'd certainly watch a series about it in a few years once it's all over, and we can laugh about it afterwords.
I Bring Doom,and a bit of gloom, but mostly gloom.

Just because people stop caring about what labels are being applied to them doesn't necessarily mean they aren't true.
Yeah, are probably a lot of exceptions but there's a reason Trump supporters have been labeled they way they have.