Nov 2023 Mod notice:
There may be other, more specific, threads about some aspects of US politics, but this one tends to act as a hub for all sorts of related news and information, so it's usually one of the busiest OTC threads.
If you're new to OTC, it's worth reading the Introduction to On-Topic Conversations
and the On-Topic Conversations debate guidelines
before posting here.
Rumor-based, fear-mongering and/or inflammatory statements that damage the quality of the thread will be thumped. Off-topic posts will also be thumped. Repeat offenders may be suspended.
If time spent moderating this thread remains a distraction from moderation of the wiki itself, the thread will need to be locked. We want to avoid that, so please follow the forum rules
when posting here.
In line with the general forum rules, 'gravedancing' is prohibited here. If you're celebrating someone's death or hoping that they die, your post will get thumped. This rule applies regardless of what the person you're discussing has said or done.
Edited by Mrph1 on Nov 30th 2023 at 11:03:59 AM
@Eschaton: I'm a fairly big fan of Prager, since we agree on most issues, and he's able to present his ideas with a pretty level head. I also think he avoids Bias Steamroller more than some other conservative speakers, which is great.
Leviticus 19:34I am certain. The west was even more lightly urbanized, but the restrictions on slavery allowed it to flourish much faster. Even then the roughed life of the West endeared them to the South, so much that there was fear the Western states would join the rebellion. But again, I reiterate the fact that those states not in the control of the Slave Powers ultimately stayed loyal. Only the fact that the South maintained and sought to strengthen slavery pushed them into a more distinct mindset that led to treason.
I should have known that would function as a summoning ritual, Parable.
Give up the fight while you still can, Capsase. The man - no, living encyclopedia - before you cannot be bested.
GM: AGOG S4 & F/WC RP; Co-GM: TABA, SOTR, UUA RP; Sub-GM: TTS RP. I have brought peace, freedom, justice, and security to my new Empire.I'd say the Civil War definitely was about more than just slavery.
Oh, the South's decision to secede was like 90+% about slavery. However, the North's reason for wanting to stop their secession was only partly fueled by abolitionist sentiment; it was at least as much about keeping the country in one piece on general principle. If the South had been a seperate nation from the beginning, the North would probably have been content to let them keep on keeping on.
There is no Bernie Sanders movement (But there could be).
Jamelle Bouie makes a smart analysis of Bernie's problems right now, and how his wing of the Democratic Party should proceed going forward. A particularly apt analogy he makes is Goldwater in 1964 - the Republican right didn't quit after he lost, but they "tilled and seeded" the political ground so that 16 years later Ronald Reagan found a lively movement he could ride to the nomination and then the White House. Bouie points out that a progressive insurgency is nothing new for the Dems, and that while the math is slightly more favourable for Bernie than it was for Dean or Brown, the fact remains that the Democratic Party requires coalition-building and compromise to succeed.
And within that space, they appealed to a narrow slice of the Democratic electorate. Predominantly white and disproportionately college-educated, these voters formed (and still form) the core of ideological liberalism within mainstream politics. Take the Dean campaign. In a 2005 survey, the Pew Research Center compared the demographics of Dean’s effort with those of the Democratic Party at large. The results don’t surprise. Just 25 percent of Democrats nationwide held college or postgraduate degrees, compared with 79 percent of Dean activists. And 92 percent were white, compared with 68 percent of all Democrats.
[...]
Which is to say that, like Dean or Bradley before for him, Sanders is a factional candidate of ideological liberal Democrats, who are largely white Democrats. The difference between now and then, however, is that, with the collapse of conservative white Democrats in the South and elsewhere, those liberal whites make up a larger share of the party. They provide more fuel for an insurgency. But they’re still not enough to overcome the influence of moderates and stalwart black voters, who form a majority of the party. That, in fact, was the fate of previous insurgencies, which crashed on the rocks of math. Ideological liberals are among the loudest Democrats, but they are a minority within the entire party. And while that minority is larger and stronger than it’s been in a generation, it’s still not strong enough to steer the party alone. It still has to play coalition politics.
Some key excerpts.
edited 24th Apr '16 1:49:39 AM by Achaemenid
Schild und Schwert der Partei![]()
Got a comparative source for that that's not simply someone reading social media and probably cherry picking?
I'll not that Sanders may well be learning the lesson, he's added a hood chunk of Hispanic and younge blacks to his voter base, he does seem to be expanding beyond the white middle class, simply not in the way many want to see.
“And the Bunny nails it!” ~ Gabrael “If the UN can get through a day without everyone strangling everyone else so can we.” ~ CyranIt's an unfortunate one but an ammusing enough one that I think I'll leave it in.
As for where, across the board I belive, he's been winning young black voters everyone and has been tying the Hispanic vote in states with a large Hispanic population. It doesn't get reported much as the press are even more hostile to Sanders then they are to Clinton.
“And the Bunny nails it!” ~ Gabrael “If the UN can get through a day without everyone strangling everyone else so can we.” ~ CyranSeems like in Maryland Hillary may have caught up in youth vote support and has a large lead anyway (Maryland is sort of like the South, but with enough African-American voters to swing the state blue), though.
"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard Feynman@Silasw
He does less badly with them - he got about 40% in South Carolina IIRC, but he doesn't win everywhere.
Guardian sub-editors on point.
Kruman: There is no "Sanders momentum" -- that's just people trying to put a narrative spin on demographics.
The chart in that post is damning to anyone expecting a Sanders upset.
![]()
![]()
At this point I don't think it will be enough to make up Sander's 241 pledged delegate deficit.
While there are 1,400 pledged delegates left, unlike the Republicans, the DNC requires all states to use a proportional system. That means Sanders doesn't just have to win more then he loses, he needs to win big and do so consistently. That's not impossible, but it's highly improbable (and would require multiple repeats of Michigan in terms of polls underestimating his actual support).
Without a majority of pledged delegates, Sanders has no chance to sway enough superdelegates because by his own logic they should back Hillary in that situation.
edited 24th Apr '16 6:16:51 AM by Falrinn
There is also a deficit in the popular vote to overcome. Clinton has accumulated a large lead there too.
Although if memory serves, Michigan was a case of the polls narrowing before the actual vote, not a "ballot box surprise".
"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard FeynmanAnd how would Bernie Sanders be able to build coalitions and compromise with the Democratic Party when the Democratic Party started at "Hillary Clinton will be the Democratic nominee"? The fact that Sanders has been competitive enough to have Clinton expound more leftist views compared to what would have been expected from a Democratic nominee in the general is compromise. The compromise here is "Hillary Clinton will be the Democratic nominee, but she needs to push the country to the left more because the Republican voters' fascist and theocratic desires scare the shit out of us."
Wizard Needs Food Badly

But yes, enough of this tangent.
edited 23rd Apr '16 8:40:52 PM by Eschaton