Nov 2023 Mod notice:
There may be other, more specific, threads about some aspects of US politics, but this one tends to act as a hub for all sorts of related news and information, so it's usually one of the busiest OTC threads.
If you're new to OTC, it's worth reading the Introduction to On-Topic Conversations
and the On-Topic Conversations debate guidelines
before posting here.
Rumor-based, fear-mongering and/or inflammatory statements that damage the quality of the thread will be thumped. Off-topic posts will also be thumped. Repeat offenders may be suspended.
If time spent moderating this thread remains a distraction from moderation of the wiki itself, the thread will need to be locked. We want to avoid that, so please follow the forum rules
when posting here.
In line with the general forum rules, 'gravedancing' is prohibited here. If you're celebrating someone's death or hoping that they die, your post will get thumped. This rule applies regardless of what the person you're discussing has said or done.
Edited by Mrph1 on Nov 30th 2023 at 11:03:59 AM
You're not considering the possibility that, in this scenario in which one or the other emerges with only a plurality of delegates rather than a majority, the one with fewer pledged delegates could actually have come out with more states won overall. Supposing that supers voted with their states, then, that could put the person with fewer pledged delegates over the top at the convention. Then the argument would become "is it more democratic to vote according to the majority in my state, or to split a state's delegation of unpledgeds proportionately, or to vote for the person who won a plurality of delegates, or to vote for the person who won the popular vote, etc., etc.", not to mention electability arguments, questions of what's best for the party, and so on.
edited 15th Apr '16 7:09:20 PM by darksidevoid
GM: AGOG S4 & F/WC RP; Co-GM: TABA, SOTR, UUA RP; Sub-GM: TTS RP. I have brought peace, freedom, justice, and security to my new Empire.![]()
Obama and Kerry pushed for ending the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Look where it is.
Remember that not all states have equal numbers of super delegates (because they're not actually tied to states in any way), so even a state lead wouldn't inherently carry over to a super delegate lead if supers voted with their states. That and Clinton currently leads in number of states won.
It's possibly maybe making some progress, which may well be better then we'd get with Clinton.
edited 15th Apr '16 7:17:27 PM by Silasw
“And the Bunny nails it!” ~ Gabrael “If the UN can get through a day without everyone strangling everyone else so can we.” ~ Cyran![]()
I'm entirely aware. I'm just saying that's an example of a reason he would have for contesting the convention, not that he would have reason to if the convention were to be held today.
We'll see. She's now only 6% ahead in CA, you know, and they don't even vote until June.
For swag points he should have bought his tax return to the Dem debate, then when Clinton challenged him on it gone "Yeah sure. Here's a copy for you, here's one for the moderator, here's one for the audience, enjoy. Now how about them speeches?"
“And the Bunny nails it!” ~ Gabrael “If the UN can get through a day without everyone strangling everyone else so can we.” ~ Cyrano_O
Way to prove your innocence, Saudi Arabia.
edited 15th Apr '16 10:04:18 PM by Demonic_Braeburn
Any group who acts like morons ironically will eventually find itself swamped by morons who think themselves to be in good company.And that hurts us how? Even if it somehow weakens the dollar, that'd be good for us.
edited 15th Apr '16 10:11:20 PM by Fighteer
"It's Occam's Shuriken! If the answer is elusive, never rule out ninjas!"For me he is. I would not be surprised if a lot of people are supporting him because of that aspect. Might also explain why his money supply is steady and also why Hillary is winning the primary anyway (the job of the president is to govern and get stuff done, after all).
"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard FeynmanOnly if you define it as "no changes whatsoever". Not likely. New social and political issues (e.g a natural disaster here, a controversial law there etc.) arise all the time.
"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard Feynman![]()
![]()
Right for the wrong reasons that. The reason he won't be able to get anything done is that he will be fighting republicans for every inch.
I like him. He seems honest and nice. I kind of like trump for the same reasons, but trump's got toupet for brains.
But then I see him politicking like that and I think, I see what you're doing there. And I don't like it. He's appealing to his base. He's manipulating people. No honest politician will ever win an election.
edited 16th Apr '16 3:25:00 AM by war877
(Many of the people fueling his campaign are Occupy Wall Street alums who are using Sanders as their megaphone to get their message of inequality out. The cult of personality with him is overestimated. A significant plurality of Democratic voters are STILL very very sore about 2008~2009. And basically while the wallpaper bubble of Occupy went away, a lot of it rebubbled with Sanders.)
On the Republican Front of History:
And to blame for this is Rove and Mitch, due to the "Mayberry Machevellis", basically Dubya era Republican politicos who though they were much more clever than the system of Capitol Hill and the White House, and a good example of this:
"John Dilulio's Letter: John Dilulio was the first senior Bush adviser to resign. Here's why."
(Basically Karl Rove and a lot of people near him prevented Dubya from moving to the Center or even Center Left on compromise Universal Children Healthcare laws or bipartisan faith bills)
It ties into Mitch while being a very good strategist, only really is a master of arcane and obscure Senate Rules and Procedures. Which can only really be used by him to obstruct. He can't really wreck the president ultimately, which feeds the rage of the base since so many laws have been passed that basically gives the president immense power to autopilot run the government based of the laws passed by Congress as is. Which angers the base, who keep seeing autopilot presidency, and keep winning seats but keep getting screwed over by the fact the President can essentially run the government with the Executive and Judiciary if the Legislative basically insists on kicking cans around.
But essentially the self repeating loop Mitch and arguably Rove and other Republicans have made since 2008 is essentially very very lethal to the party's stability. it's riding entirely on short term gains, but since the base refuses to accept opening the doors to Hispanics, Muslims or African Americans, so on, so forth, the party is basically caught in a death spiral that it would take a miracle to escape.
edited 16th Apr '16 3:28:59 AM by PotatoesRock

@Handle, your homeland specifically is safe if I remember where you're from correctly, it's the rest of the region that has to worry.
The worry with Clinton isn't that she'd start a bunch of stupid wars, she's not that crazy, it's more that she isn't going to address the long term issues that have made the US hatred in the region, she's not going to roll back the support of unpopular regimes, she's not going to push for a end to the Israel-Palesitne conflict. On top of that she's unlikely to follow in Bill's footsteps and manage to work with the Russians when it comes to building peace, she's not going to roll back support for the Pakistnai government, she's not going to deal with Eastern Europe and the problems there in a reasonable manner.
“And the Bunny nails it!” ~ Gabrael “If the UN can get through a day without everyone strangling everyone else so can we.” ~ Cyran