Nov 2023 Mod notice:
There may be other, more specific, threads about some aspects of US politics, but this one tends to act as a hub for all sorts of related news and information, so it's usually one of the busiest OTC threads.
If you're new to OTC, it's worth reading the Introduction to On-Topic Conversations
and the On-Topic Conversations debate guidelines
before posting here.
Rumor-based, fear-mongering and/or inflammatory statements that damage the quality of the thread will be thumped. Off-topic posts will also be thumped. Repeat offenders may be suspended.
If time spent moderating this thread remains a distraction from moderation of the wiki itself, the thread will need to be locked. We want to avoid that, so please follow the forum rules
when posting here.
In line with the general forum rules, 'gravedancing' is prohibited here. If you're celebrating someone's death or hoping that they die, your post will get thumped. This rule applies regardless of what the person you're discussing has said or done.
Edited by Mrph1 on Nov 30th 2023 at 11:03:59 AM
But it doesn't. They are a government sanctioned citizen militia.
As in, they serve the federal government and military and are effectively a part of it's fighting force. They don't keep it check just like some common grunt in the USMC doesn't keep the JCOS in check.
They aren't citizens, they're all reservists.
edited 28th Mar '16 10:43:04 AM by LeGarcon
Oh really when?![]()
The why is the most important part!
"Again, Switzerland. You say "we're not Switzerland", and that's true, but it's hardly equivalent to mob rule and violence for a large part of population to have military training. That was actually the norm in many societies, who could hardly be called examples of mob rule."
When professional military forces were smaller and the nature of warfare was more geared toward choking up the frontline with a rampart of corpses.
edited 28th Mar '16 10:43:03 AM by CrimsonZephyr
"For all those whose cares have been our concern, the work goes on, the cause endures, the hope still lives, and the dream shall never die."I can vouch for mandatory military service breeding resentment. In Brazil our draft is still mandatory and most people really don't care for it. People often find ways of dodging it. I got out of it thanks to a diagnosis from a doctor emphasizing how I was a poor fit for it thanks to my Asperger's, and I'm very thankful I didn't have to go through with it. I don't care for military culture in the slightest and I don't want to go dying off in some conflict I might not even believe in. Fuck that.
As that was exactly what I was advocating in the first place, I'm not sure what the point is.
As I said in the first place, a citizen-soldier culture encourages a sense of duty to the nation.
But anyway, as this is arguing in circles with people being increasingly hysterical it's rather pointless to continue.
edited 28th Mar '16 10:47:25 AM by CassidyTheDevil
@breeding resentment: My brother joined the military willingly, and he resents military service more than anyone I know. Our soldiers already are made up of half jingoistic asshats and half depressed, disenchanted people who feel like they're hurting innocent people and ruining lives.
Making everyone in the country go into service will just increase the size of those groups.
"As I said in the first place, a citizen-soldier culture encourages a sense of duty to the nation."
Or it breeds resentment for a government that doesn't particularly care about you either way, for a nation whose history and traditions you can't wholeheartedly celebrate with a clean conscience, and for fellow citizenry who probably hate you, anyway, and for whom you have nothing, but unending disdain.
edited 28th Mar '16 10:48:55 AM by CrimsonZephyr
"For all those whose cares have been our concern, the work goes on, the cause endures, the hope still lives, and the dream shall never die."Here's the thing, when you serve your nation in a military context you do not ever question it. You do not keep your superior officers accountable, you are their property.
The Swiss realize that when the shit hits the fan they are expendable government property.
Accountability couldn't be further distanced from military duty.
Oh really when?Anything violent or that requires them to be armed and trained? No.
In a democracy accountability isn't tied to military power, Switzerland isn't an example of military training leading to accountability because the two are in no way connected, the Swiss government is not especially accountable because it's people have guns, it's especially accountable due to a cultural and political system based on referendums and popular consent that predates everyone being armed.
edited 28th Mar '16 10:51:09 AM by Silasw
“And the Bunny nails it!” ~ Gabrael “If the UN can get through a day without everyone strangling everyone else so can we.” ~ CyranOh, and in response to Jack's whole thing about military dictatorship from a few pages back...you are aware that most military dictatorships come with a bodycount? Often a fairly substantial one? You don't need your own Augusto Pinochet. You definitely don't need your own National Reorganization Process. And that's what an American military dictatorship would probably look like.
But you cannot create it after the fact. The Swiss government knew that it was a safe bet to arm people because they already had a functioning political culture. Arming people in a country where the political culture is already screwed up beyond belief, conversely, is just an amazingly bad idea.
edited 28th Mar '16 11:11:59 AM by AmbarSonofDeshar
Switzerland is hardly unique in requiring mandatory military service. Here is wikipedia's list of countries that have it: [1]
I won't claim to be an expert in exactly why each individual country chooses to have it, but my understanding is that most people in most of those countries just think of it as some annoying thing they're forced to do but isn't really a moral issue, like paying taxes.
Also it's unrelated to arming people in general.
edited 28th Mar '16 11:03:52 AM by Clarste
@Breeding resentment: Again, it's not necessarily the case. It's true that everybody that's been to the military here complains about the military, but if there is resentment, it's more "why aren't the Haredim/wussy north-Tel-Avivians/insert group here doing their part too" and less "woe is me I have to shoot people". FYI, most soldiers won't even shoot a gun aside from ranges once every year once they're out of BT — there are, I think, roughly seven non-coms for every combatant (and not every "combatant" sees action).
On empty crossroads, seek the eclipse -- for when Sol and Lua align, the lost shall find their way home.If your rationale for mandatory military service is to give everyone the experience of serving in direct combat, you're sadly deluded, since unless you manufacture a perpetual state of warfare, most conscripts will enter and leave service without ever firing a shot off of a training course. I'm not sure how this is supposed to inculcate any sort of responsibility ethos.
"It's Occam's Shuriken! If the answer is elusive, never rule out ninjas!"Hmm...Good point. But no, I was thinking if a large part of population gets that training, violent criminals would be easier to stop.
Which, I guess is technically not what people usually think as accountability, but it sort of is right? Eh, whatever.

I think this has gone on long enough that Cassidy's point has been severely muddled. (And that change of subject from businesses to military service was extremely abrupt.)
And quite frankly, I fail to see how there wouldn't be huge resistance to conscription; mandatory military service is increasingly unpopular and the draft hasn't been enforced for decades specifically because of that. People who volunteer for military service are far more likely to be good at it than someone forced into it. You're highly unlikely to change the problem with how our culture treats guns in this manner, for a lot of reasons unrelated to our unhealthy gun culture. (Which, again, I'm not even sure what Cassidy's point was with that.)
In any case, there's other forms of civil service, and forcing people to do them is also going to be unpopular. Though you could possibly get it through as requirements to graduate from school.