Nov 2023 Mod notice:
There may be other, more specific, threads about some aspects of US politics, but this one tends to act as a hub for all sorts of related news and information, so it's usually one of the busiest OTC threads.
If you're new to OTC, it's worth reading the Introduction to On-Topic Conversations
and the On-Topic Conversations debate guidelines
before posting here.
Rumor-based, fear-mongering and/or inflammatory statements that damage the quality of the thread will be thumped. Off-topic posts will also be thumped. Repeat offenders may be suspended.
If time spent moderating this thread remains a distraction from moderation of the wiki itself, the thread will need to be locked. We want to avoid that, so please follow the forum rules
when posting here.
In line with the general forum rules, 'gravedancing' is prohibited here. If you're celebrating someone's death or hoping that they die, your post will get thumped. This rule applies regardless of what the person you're discussing has said or done.
Edited by Mrph1 on Nov 30th 2023 at 11:03:59 AM
And at the same time he threatens the viability of the GOP at least on the presidential election side of things, but that could snowball into congressional and senate seats being taken by democrats as well. Trump is basically the GOP's worst nightmare.
Though, really, we've already gone over that he's basically the end result of the Southern Strategy.
edited 17th Mar '16 6:50:33 AM by Cronosonic
From a few pages ago:
"Hillary is probably the most qualified person we've had in recent memory and I'm going to be very disappointed if she loses because of some childish notion that Sanders is our lord and savior and any other candidate is the devil incarnate."
I agree, and I'll add that I think it's unhealthy and exceedingly unrealistic to expect a candidate is going to magically solve all our problems. It happened with Obama in '08, and we're now seeing it again in BOTH Sanders and Trump (obviously the two candidates are very different).
Stubbornly staying home out of spite if Sanders drops out accomplishes nothing except giving another vote to the opposite party. And we'd be a lot worse off if Trump beats Clinton. That's how people have to look at it.
I have to wonder whether it makes a difference whether Trump gets the absolute majority of delegates (1237?) or just the plurality, at least in terms of how likely GOP will make an anti-Trump coup in Cleveland.
"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard Feynman![]()
No candidate has to concede until the convention, although if/when Clinton acquires a simple majority of all possible delegates, it'll look kind of silly for Sanders to stay in the race; he'd have to shoot for some kind of revolt among the superdelegates to force a brokered convention.
Obviously, that is exactly the strategy on the GOP side.
The GOP elite have talked about throwing out the primary results entirely should Trump win a simple majority. That's how desperate they are. If he only achieves a plurality, but not a majority, then the direct outcome would be a brokered convention, which is what his rivals are all hoping for. That would at least have the veneer of legitimacy.
edited 17th Mar '16 7:10:28 AM by Fighteer
"It's Occam's Shuriken! If the answer is elusive, never rule out ninjas!"It's not factually wrong to say that staying at home will help the opposition, but relying on that too much just creates a disaffected base, which is one of the biggest problems the Democrats have. If Clinton really wanted those votes, she should have taken a more progressive stance and made them feel represented. She chose not to, which is the only reason why Sanders ever had a chance to begin with. Her weakness was his gain, just like Bush's weakness was Obama's gain. What we're seeing is not idealization, it's people desperate to grasp at any last resort option that looks sane after their first choice dropped the ball.
Remember all those times Republicans accused Democrats of thinking that Obama was Jesus, when all we actually wanted was a reasonable, moderate authority figure?
Furthermore, I think Guantanamo must be destroyed.Unfortunately, in a national political scene where there are only two viable parties, letting the perfect be the enemy of the good is inherently self-defeating.
"It's Occam's Shuriken! If the answer is elusive, never rule out ninjas!"![]()
![]()
![]()
There are people like me who can't call themselves liberal or conservative who want someone to fight for them too. Without more viable parties that means you can't go too far into the margins during a general. Something Cruz doesn't and never will understand. If not for his racism and other issues, Trump would actually count as someone who realizes that with his populism. Indeed, there are people who ignore the former in favor of the latter.
Credit where it's due, at least Sanders recognizes that, from his days in the Senate, he'd have to do babysteps that are mutually beneficial...meaning everything he's promising now he knows he wouldn't be able to make it happen quickly, if at all. His argument then is to just get the ball rolling. Less sexy, which is why he doesn't say it much, but more realistic.
Hil's problem is that she's gotten so jaded she doesn't paint an ideal picture and goes straight for what is realistic, which is practical and will serve her well in the general, but at the cost of ideological passion, which won't.
Not really. no. The center is the only place she herself can win.
edited 17th Mar '16 8:15:17 AM by FFShinra
Trump had the audacity to question the justifications for the Iraq war, something that is heresy in orthodox Republican circles.
"It's Occam's Shuriken! If the answer is elusive, never rule out ninjas!"There are a few things to note:
- One Republican official said they based how many election machines for each polling station based on historical figures, so a higher turnout would've made lines longer.
- Comments on the article are saying that there were also long lines at certain Republican polling stations as well.
- An election-law attorney pointed out that Harris County has been investigated on election based allegations back in 2009, when officials blocked thousands of voters from registration as a reason for scrutiny.
As I have said before, and I will say it again, I would like it if other places would invoke my home county's way of doing things, which is interconnecting all election machines within the county so you can vote anywhere.
"We're all paper, we're all scissors, we're all fightin' with our mirrors, scared we'll never find somebody to love."Statistically, Democratic primary turnout has been lower this cycle than in 2008, while Republican turnout is up from 2012, so the idea that they failed to anticipate the number of Democratic voters seems absurd.
"It's Occam's Shuriken! If the answer is elusive, never rule out ninjas!"Yes, and those machines provide us with constant fuel for conspiracy theories.
As a rule, no matter who wins the election, the other side will start talking about how the machines were rigged, democracy is a sham, and the new President is an Illuminati plant.
My Tumblr. Currently side-by-side liveblogging Digimon Adventure, sub vs dub.Psh, we all know that all the Illuminati really does is put subliminal messages here and there for their amusement. It's not like they have actual goals or anything.
Leviticus 19:34Any time you catch me saying something that's factually wrong, I was actually right but the Illuminati changed my post to discredit me.
My Tumblr. Currently side-by-side liveblogging Digimon Adventure, sub vs dub.@ Aszur: So do we...
@ Tobias:
As a rule, no matter who wins the election, the other side will start talking about how the machines were rigged, democracy is a sham, and the new President is an Illuminati plant.
Then don't use voting machines.
edited 17th Mar '16 10:00:28 AM by Greenmantle
Keep Rolling On

edited 17th Mar '16 6:38:29 AM by Fighteer
"It's Occam's Shuriken! If the answer is elusive, never rule out ninjas!"