Nov 2023 Mod notice:
There may be other, more specific, threads about some aspects of US politics, but this one tends to act as a hub for all sorts of related news and information, so it's usually one of the busiest OTC threads.
If you're new to OTC, it's worth reading the Introduction to On-Topic Conversations
and the On-Topic Conversations debate guidelines
before posting here.
Rumor-based, fear-mongering and/or inflammatory statements that damage the quality of the thread will be thumped. Off-topic posts will also be thumped. Repeat offenders may be suspended.
If time spent moderating this thread remains a distraction from moderation of the wiki itself, the thread will need to be locked. We want to avoid that, so please follow the forum rules
when posting here.
In line with the general forum rules, 'gravedancing' is prohibited here. If you're celebrating someone's death or hoping that they die, your post will get thumped. This rule applies regardless of what the person you're discussing has said or done.
Edited by Mrph1 on Nov 30th 2023 at 11:03:59 AM
![]()
![]()
I did recently hear someone say that they think that at some point, Chiapas will eventually secede from Mexico.
Also-anyone have any current stats on Sanders' standings in tomorrow's states?
EDIT:
edited 4th Mar '16 5:25:45 PM by SciFiSlasher
"Somehow the hated have to walk a tightrope, while those who hate do not."
Some people from Chiapas do think it was a mistake to return to Mexico after their failed attempt at forming a republic with the Central American countries. Unfortunately, the people who think that are, for the most part, indigenous, so no one takes them seriously. Also, Chiapas is too poor and too much of a mess to really do anything. Especially after the Zapatistas became irrelevant.
However, it is believed that if the Yucatan peninsula states declared their independence (again), Chiapas could join them.
Now, these are merely rumours, but if Mexico ends up in a war againt the US, the southern states could take advantage of that and go their way. Which is why so many Mexicans are so interested in the US election. If Trump wins, some Mexicans may benefit from that.
I think most people expect Louisiana to go to Clinton, Nebraska and Kansas should be close, and Maine is likely to go Bernie's way.
Trouble is, the March 15th primaries include some big, battleground states, including Florida, Ohio, Illinois, and North Carolina. And for the most part, they don't look good for Bernie. At all. If Clinton picks them up, it's hard to see where Bernie can make up for it, especially since every one of those states has more delegates up for grabs than any so far, except for Texas.
That's why I've been sadly predicting that the primary is likely to be over for all intents and purposes by the 15th. Bernie may continue to fight on, but unless he pulls off some upsets or does better than expected, it's hard to see him having a path forward, to quote Mr. Carson.
edited 4th Mar '16 7:08:47 PM by TheWanderer
| Wandering, but not lost. | If people bring so much courage to this world...◊ |And then there were 4.
edited 4th Mar '16 8:06:10 PM by Demonic_Braeburn
Any group who acts like morons ironically will eventually find itself swamped by morons who think themselves to be in good company.Steven Crowder (a Conservative) released a video called "Why Republicans Deserve to Lose". To quote him (with some paraphrasing):
"Republicans seem very good at one thing: Losing. In 2012, Obama was proposing a wildly unpopular healthcare bill. So naturally, the GOP nominates the only other American to have ever signed a similar bill. So, when the Democrats look posed to nominate a person who has the second highest unapproval rating in an election since Reagan, the Republicans appear poised to nominate the candidate with the second highest approval rating....Now, sometimes you have to gamble, I know. However, you only do it when the reward is high. So, what's our reward if Trump does win? We get, for our president, a lifelong democrat, pro-choice, anti-second amendment, anti-free speech, four bankruptcies, and self-admitted serial philanderer".
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NhNJoqs1eCE
edited 4th Mar '16 8:22:51 PM by Protagonist506
Leviticus 19:34Trump's greatest advantage is that people care far more about his rhetoric and soundbites than about his actual beliefs.
I suppose that's true of all politicians to some extent, but Trump couldn't get nominated in either party if people actually looked at his miss-mash of positions that range everywhere from the far-right to the center-left.
edited 4th Mar '16 9:03:16 PM by Demonic_Braeburn
Any group who acts like morons ironically will eventually find itself swamped by morons who think themselves to be in good company.I'll give everyone a nickel to vote Rubio instead of Trump.
edited 4th Mar '16 10:03:12 PM by Protagonist506
Leviticus 19:34@Trump being too liberal vs too xenophobic: I consider him to be both. Where as he wants a welfare state for white people only, I want capitalism for everyone. In my eyes, Trump is basically the human avatar of Un-Americanism.
I think Conservatives in general will probably try to pin Trump's failures on his liberalism, even if they do consider him racist they don't consider it in their own interests to call him one. A lot of conservatives consider themselves victims of Political Correctness Gone Mad and are therefore reluctant to call someone else racist due to a sort of cry wolf effect.
Leviticus 19:34I would like to take this opportunity to note that racism exists and is a possible factor in directing voting behavior in every part of the country, not just the South. Conservative voters in the South are generally just the most vocal of their ilk about it. The scenario described would thus be potentially harmful to the GOP in far more than the South alone.
edited 5th Mar '16 12:09:39 AM by darksidevoid
GM: AGOG S4 & F/WC RP; Co-GM: TABA, SOTR, UUA RP; Sub-GM: TTS RP. I have brought peace, freedom, justice, and security to my new Empire.Trump kind of reminds me of Nixon. A moderate presenting himself a demagogue, all while subtly pandering to the more racist parts of American society.
edited 5th Mar '16 12:51:36 AM by Demonic_Braeburn
Any group who acts like morons ironically will eventually find itself swamped by morons who think themselves to be in good company.>subtly
o i am laffin
But yes, Trump shares some similarities to Nixon in that regard. Though I'm not so sure the Silent Majority applies,note since he is appealing to people who voice their dissent quite loudly and have simply not been listened to. More importantly, any notion of Bringing Us Together
is overridden by Making America Great Again,note and apparently at any cost.
Or actually, at no cost.
Think of the core of his campaign: the wall. He's not paying for it. You're not paying for it. Mexico is paying for it. He's not going to cut out welfare, he's going to increase our military power, and force everybody to bring back jobs, all without costing you a dime. And his campaign doesn't even cost you your dignity, because you know he's best and last chance at desperately holding onto or taking back the dignity of "real Americans." That's the heart of Trump's deal with America.
Greatness has never been so cheap.
edited 5th Mar '16 1:41:43 AM by Eschaton
Hillary Clinton has agreed to join Bernie Sanders at a Fox News town hall on Monday night.

Ah, I forgot Greenland and Bermuda.