Nov 2023 Mod notice:
There may be other, more specific, threads about some aspects of US politics, but this one tends to act as a hub for all sorts of related news and information, so it's usually one of the busiest OTC threads.
If you're new to OTC, it's worth reading the Introduction to On-Topic Conversations
and the On-Topic Conversations debate guidelines
before posting here.
Rumor-based, fear-mongering and/or inflammatory statements that damage the quality of the thread will be thumped. Off-topic posts will also be thumped. Repeat offenders may be suspended.
If time spent moderating this thread remains a distraction from moderation of the wiki itself, the thread will need to be locked. We want to avoid that, so please follow the forum rules
when posting here.
In line with the general forum rules, 'gravedancing' is prohibited here. If you're celebrating someone's death or hoping that they die, your post will get thumped. This rule applies regardless of what the person you're discussing has said or done.
Edited by Mrph1 on Nov 30th 2023 at 11:03:59 AM
Hold on a sec, we've got someone arguing that a civilian pulling out a gun in the middle of a riot to defend themselves would be helpful? Seriously?
I mean, I guess if you want to gun down anyone who looks swarthy and upset and then get yourself mowed down by a police counterterrorism unit, it's a decent option, but there have to be easier, more reliable, and more neighbourly ways to commit suicide. Speaking of, have we talked about the impact of readily-accessible firearms on accident and suicide rates? Interpersonal violence is responsible for a relatively small fraction of gun injuries and deaths
- statistically, the gun you buy is far more likely to hurt you than anyone else.
Yeah that sounds like the fastest possible way to turn a riot into a proper uprising and to get your ass gunned down immediately by the National Guard.
Then of course there's terrorist groups like the Oath Keepers who wander around with guns with then intention of starting riots so they can shoot minorities and police in equal measure.
edited 29th Dec '15 11:03:34 AM by LeGarcon
Oh really when?I think the idea was that you have the gun for defending your home and business.
Now to me this all seems rather hypothetical, how often do you guys have massive riots on such a scale that the police just abandon areas and people are left to fend for themselves? Because it just feels like something out a survivalist's wet dream more then reality.
“And the Bunny nails it!” ~ Gabrael “If the UN can get through a day without everyone strangling everyone else so can we.” ~ CyranOne thing I love about then gun arguement is when gun nuts salivate over the fact that the US army is the most advanced, powerful and technologically sophisticated one in the world while, at the same time, they are convinced that in a case the government goes tyrannical, a couple of rednecks with A Ks will be able to stop said army from taking away their freedom.
edited 29th Dec '15 12:01:18 PM by LogoP
It is sometimes an appropriate response to reality to go insane.![]()
So the people who should be buying guns for self defence are black people? Bet that will go down well with the redneck crowd. What's the NRA like on racial stuff anyway?
![]()
In Ferguson, black residents stand guard at white-owned store.
![]()
Didn't they come across after the Black Panthers marched into the statehouse with said guns, I would hardly call that defense against lynching, but then if I had my way nobody who wasn't a cop or some other kind of security person would be allowed to cary guns into government buildings. Especially not the representatives themselves, remember Charles Sumner.
In Baltimore's case the police were being specifically petulant in a manner probably designed to mirror the tactics used by the LAPD in the Rodney King trials. Pwiegle's post was enlightening in that regard, as I didn't know the riots were due to the LAPD wussing out on doing their jobs because a prosecutor had the audacity to go after the police, so the Baltimore police weren't being uniquely derelict in their duty, they hoped to emulate the same situation, and then when anarchy descended on the abandoned neighborhoods, they would be welcomed as heroes, or something.
Regarding Pwiegle and the Riots - his point was that, during the riots sparked by the Rodney King trial, the businesses and homes of those that owned guns were left unharmed by those doing the rioting/looting, as even in California some level of Castle Doctrine would be seen as acceptable.
That said, Pwiegle, while I respect your right to own a gun, I think my desire to ensure that those that own guns know what the fuck they're doing is a reasonable one. As it stands, I live in NY, and even with as stringent as our laws are, I could go into any gun shop, apply, and get a gun while having never fired or handled one in my life. It's what leads to cases like the guy in Pittsburgh who (allegedly) fired a shot at his neighbor's house because he (again, allegedly) didn't know how to unload his gun to clean it.
And yes, part of "know what the fuck they're doing" would include safe storage of said gun, so we can avoid situations like that 11-year-old killing his 8-year-old neighbor with an unsecured shotgun left in a closet because she wouldn't let him see her new puppy
.
edited 29th Dec '15 12:45:38 PM by ironballs16
"Why would I inflict myself on somebody else?"![]()
![]()
While I completely agree that people who choose to own a gun should know how to handle and store it safely, at this point such things are entirely on a voluntary basis. There are mandatory safety education courses for getting a hunting license, but none for just owning a gun. You're not even required to read the instruction manual that comes with it.
Probably because trying to implement some sort of official training course nationwide would be an administrative nightmare that nobody wants to take on, never mind the resistance it would get from States' Rights groups and the like. As with belling the cat, it's a lot easier to suggest a plan than to actually carry it out.
edited 29th Dec '15 2:07:09 PM by pwiegle
This Space Intentionally Left Blank.Some already do. (New Jersey, for example.) But the states are notorious for stonewalling anything that the federal government tries to force on them. Despite it being the "United States," said states still enjoy and exercise a certain degree of autonomy.
In short: Politics, man. Politics...
EDIT: Actually, I was mistaken. To get a New Jersey Firearms ID Card (which you need to purchase a gun in that state), you have to be fingerprinted, background checked, mental health evaluated, and give references. But you don't actually have to know a thing about gun safety.
edited 29th Dec '15 2:45:46 PM by pwiegle
This Space Intentionally Left Blank.
Which is mostly-agreeable, but still ass-backwards regarding ensuring people don't literally shoot themselves in the foot. Seriously, I'd love to see reasonable objections to such mandated training for firearm ownership, but other forums I've brought it up on tend to fall back on "shall not be infringed!!!!1!!111!!" as pretty much the entirety of their argument.
edited 29th Dec '15 3:04:37 PM by ironballs16
"Why would I inflict myself on somebody else?"Don't we all? As Einstein said, "The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has limits."
In Shooting Industry magazine, a publication distributed to FFL holders, there used to be a regular column entitled: "I Answer Dumb Questions." Now, I've heard a LOT of 'em during my time working the counter at the gun shop, but some of the ones in there scared the hell out me...
edited 29th Dec '15 3:17:47 PM by pwiegle
This Space Intentionally Left Blank.

Yeah. The Appeal to Inherent Nature is, in my opinion, a bit silly.
Leviticus 19:34