Nov 2023 Mod notice:
There may be other, more specific, threads about some aspects of US politics, but this one tends to act as a hub for all sorts of related news and information, so it's usually one of the busiest OTC threads.
If you're new to OTC, it's worth reading the Introduction to On-Topic Conversations
and the On-Topic Conversations debate guidelines
before posting here.
Rumor-based, fear-mongering and/or inflammatory statements that damage the quality of the thread will be thumped. Off-topic posts will also be thumped. Repeat offenders may be suspended.
If time spent moderating this thread remains a distraction from moderation of the wiki itself, the thread will need to be locked. We want to avoid that, so please follow the forum rules
when posting here.
In line with the general forum rules, 'gravedancing' is prohibited here. If you're celebrating someone's death or hoping that they die, your post will get thumped. This rule applies regardless of what the person you're discussing has said or done.
Edited by Mrph1 on Nov 30th 2023 at 11:03:59 AM
Hmm, to go by the news, the Iran deal was DoA in the Senate due to all the warmongering. I'm surprised to hear that it's looking like it may pass.
"It's Occam's Shuriken! If the answer is elusive, never rule out ninjas!"Stupid Chuck, if the deal goes south, Iran will just continue along like they have been! Especially because the deal calls for them to dismantle some of the more inaccessible nuclear facilities, meaning that if they decided to buck the agreement in 10 years, while they might have material, they won't have the fortified bases to keep it safe.
The problem is AIPAC making the perfect (or their version of perfect, which would be airstrikes at the very least) the enemy of the good. This deal will do more to slow them down than keeping the restrictions in place, unless Iran is acting in completely bad faith, which would be shortsighted on the regime's part. Iran has no incentive not to keep working towards breakout capacity otherwise, though i would think they won't actually cross into a nuke without clear provocation.
Catholic Health Care System can't block employees contraceptive coverage
@Fighteer: "Passing" was never the issue because (thanks, Obama!) the deal is being done by executive order.
What the House and the Senate want to do is get a veto-proof majority to scuttle the deal, which is not happening - and honestly, I'm not sure how enforceable a Congressional rejection of the deal is, since "reimposing sanctions" is physically impossible by this point. While America has won the current round of talks, they absolutely do not have the credibility to reopen negotiations or get the 5+1 to return to sanctioning Iran - everyone except Congress wants to get back to doing business. (And nobody can force Obama to order strikes against Iran.)
So for a clown, he is not without merit? What I from the Vox article his biggest impact was making a fool of all other Rep candidates by highlighting how unlike them he has better understanding of politics and rather decent policies.
At this point I'm sure Trump is trolling the Republicans, if their heavy weight candidates can't argue or prove themselves more sensible than a guy who's in it for the shits and giggles publicity stunts, I'm sure the average american voter will think twice about voting for those morons who can't compete with a clown.
Inter arma enim silent legesMaybe the idea that Trump is a stealth Democrat out to destroy the GOP from within has a bit of merit? It's a fun conspiracy theory if nothing else.
I mean, he used to be on pretty good terms with Clintons, maybe he is doing Hillary a favor by trying to ensure she wins?
Why is he gunning for Japan again?
edited 7th Aug '15 5:19:44 PM by Rationalinsanity
Politics is the skilled use of blunt objects.Please, in all sincerity...
Why does everyone think that the democrats have some sort of shoe in? Or that Trump or any of the other batshits don't have a chance of being elected?
"Psssh. Even if you could catch a miracle on a picture any person would probably delete it to make space for more porn." - AszurTrump has a 60% disapproval rating among the general American public, and that's likely to rise as the campaign goes on and he tries the same tactics that work alright in the primary on the entire country. Unless the GOP vote suppression tactics work perfectly, Trump has no prayer in the general. He's more radical than anyone before him and he lacks the tact to hide it. If anything he is likely to energize minorities, the left, etc.
Barring a massive shift in public opinion (or if Clinton royally screws up), Trump doesn't have the support to get very far.
Now the Democrats should in no way lower their guard, guys like Walker or Jeb Bush are still a threat because they can pretend to be moderates while being totally dogmatic sociopaths on the job, but they do have an edge going in. The demographics and electoral math (at least for the presidential race, Congress is another story) do favor the Dems, though not overwhelmingly.
edited 7th Aug '15 5:35:36 PM by Rationalinsanity
Politics is the skilled use of blunt objects.

A brewing political fight for Democrats: Chuck Schumer, the heir apparent to Harry Reid's position as chief of the Senate, has come out against the Iran deal
. As a result of this and some other things he's done over the years, (Schumer is more or less the definitive example of a Wall St. Democrat) he's getting lambasted by forces both inside and outside the party
, and inheriting the job as chief of the Senate Democrats is in some slight doubt for the first time.
Regardless the Iran deal should have enough support to not be in danger, but this is going to be an interesting little squabble.
| Wandering, but not lost. | If people bring so much courage to this world...◊ |