Nov 2023 Mod notice:
There may be other, more specific, threads about some aspects of US politics, but this one tends to act as a hub for all sorts of related news and information, so it's usually one of the busiest OTC threads.
If you're new to OTC, it's worth reading the Introduction to On-Topic Conversations
and the On-Topic Conversations debate guidelines
before posting here.
Rumor-based, fear-mongering and/or inflammatory statements that damage the quality of the thread will be thumped. Off-topic posts will also be thumped. Repeat offenders may be suspended.
If time spent moderating this thread remains a distraction from moderation of the wiki itself, the thread will need to be locked. We want to avoid that, so please follow the forum rules
when posting here.
In line with the general forum rules, 'gravedancing' is prohibited here. If you're celebrating someone's death or hoping that they die, your post will get thumped. This rule applies regardless of what the person you're discussing has said or done.
Edited by Mrph1 on Nov 30th 2023 at 11:03:59 AM
![]()
![]()
Well, I don't remember the source, but between the roman conquest of Greece and the Greek Independance most Greeks referred to themselves as Romaioi, which means Roman. And they used that name for about a millenia, if they could change, so can the US.
edited 29th Jul '15 3:52:26 PM by IFwanderer
1 2 We are what we pretend to be, so we must be careful about what we pretend to be. -KVAszur: I'm not saying those names derive from the country name. I'm saying there are others I've heard.
- Costa Rica->Costa Rican
- Dominican Republic->Dominican
- Guatemala->Guatemalan
- Honduras->Honduran
- New Zealand->New Zealander
- Philippines->Flipino/a.
Maybe the ones you listed can be used too but in my experience these are the ones people use.
edited 29th Jul '15 3:53:47 PM by Kostya
@Washingtonian: I am fairly certain that Washington himself would not want people getting named after him, since that reeks of royalty (and he hated royal trappings).
I'm also certain most people who live in the U.S. would not like to think of themselves as named after doing lots of laundry.
![]()
![]()
Dutch: try getting "Holland" or "Netherlands" from that. Even the region of Vlaams gets lucky with "Flemish". Even though they're technically Beligians. The US was started by the Dutch... embrace your heritage: go weird!
Only Brits who move to South Africa are Rooineks. The rest are Limeys.
edited 29th Jul '15 3:59:29 PM by Euodiachloris
![]()
That's ignoring that were called Yankees, Cowboys, Imperialists, and Capitalist dogs.
Or until the world does which aint likely. You got a better chance of China adhering to enviromental and anti pollution laws.
edited 29th Jul '15 4:02:35 PM by Skycobra51
Look upon my privilege ye mighty and despair.Lets be clear, citizens of the United States will never ever stop calling themselves Americans unless the rest of the continent invades US, destroys our culture,literally not in the bullshit conservative arguments, and makes it a crime punishable by death for citizens of the US to call themselves Americans.
I Bring Doom,and a bit of gloom, but mostly gloom.
Ma'am. There are no Belgians.
But yeah, sorry. "Ticos" or "Catrachos" and everything are just as acceptable demonyms. They have a history. In particular, during the wars against fillibuster, William Walker, the armies were under a general named "Xatracho". So, when they came, like The Cavalry, people started shouting "Ahí vienen los Xatruches!" (Here come the Xatruches!)
That later turned into "Catrachos" and that is why the Hondurans are also known as "Catrachos".
"Yankee" likewise, has a very important and historical component to the identity of the United States, as does Gringo.
So what's the problem with more?
edited 29th Jul '15 4:01:24 PM by Aszur
It has always been the prerogative of children and half-wits to point out that the emperor has no clothesAnd I do not know where you get "France" from Cheese-Eating Surrender Monkeys
It has always been the prerogative of children and half-wits to point out that the emperor has no clothesThere are problems with calling people from the United States of America plenty of the things suggested:
- Unitedstatian - We're as much the only united states as the only people on America - potential other Unitedstatians include, but are not limited to, people from Australia and Mexico.
- Yankees - As accurate as calling every single person in the United Kingdom "English". Yanks or Yankees are New Englanders. Or if you're in the Deep South, everything north of the Mason-Dixon Line.
- Washingtonians - Even more specific demonym, Washingtonians are people from the state of Washington.
edited 29th Jul '15 4:32:37 PM by Balmung
"Dutch" seems to be an English invention. According to The Other Wiki, it means language of the common people. Adorable.
As for the whole "American" thing, the other Latin American countries do not like it because daddy Spain taught us that "América" was just one continent, from Canada to Argentina, although it could be divided in subregions like North America, South America, the Caribbean Islands, etc. That's why, in the Hispanospehere, we can say without irony that we all live in América.
Edited to add: Here's what the RAE* says about the word América
:
Even the institution that regulates our language (because we actually have rules), says that América is the name of the continent.
It's one of those differences between different cultures, in this case the Spanish vs the rest of the world. Another example of how weird we are is in the "Billions". We say it's a million millions (1,000,000,000,000), while english speaking people say it's a thousand millions (1,000,000,000).
RAE stands for Real Academia Española (Royal Spanish Academy) and they're the institution responsible for overseeing the Spanish language. When they say something is true, then it's true when speaking the Spanish language.
edited 29th Jul '15 4:53:08 PM by Cid
As far as I'm aware, North and South America are two different continents, tectonics and all that, with the only surface link being Centeral America, at least until the Panama canal.
Which means the Spaniards didn't know their geology.
New Brittania? Really?
New York is shorter and easier to say. Blame the British, they named everything in the original 13.
edited 29th Jul '15 4:57:08 PM by Skycobra51
Look upon my privilege ye mighty and despair.América, ist wunderbar! Cadillacs zoom in it! Twelve share a room in it!
What's wrong with 'gringos'? I mean, besides it sounding awful. Or what about USA Citizen? Kinda dry, but we tropers are no strangers to boring yet efficient descriptive names?
Aaah, why couldn't them findy fathers find a better collective name for those united states of America's? Like, New Britannia (ALL HAIL!), or Mercadia, or something.
Heck, why isn't the State of New York called New Yorkshire? Why isn't there an Aftersex and a Bessex to match Sussex and Essex?
edited 29th Jul '15 4:53:03 PM by TheHandle
Darkness cannot drive out darkness; only light can do that. Hate cannot drive out hate; only love can do that.Yorkshire is the name of the county in England, York is the name of the central town in said county. So if you're going to name a city by adding "New" to another name, why wouldn't said other name also be a city?
(Conveniently ignoring that it started out as New Amsterdam, of course.)
Expergiscēre cras, medior quam hodie. (Awaken tomorrow, better than today.)

97372: Also, for the Falklanders, the most dick-ish in my country (Argentina) call them "Kelpers".
edited 29th Jul '15 3:46:22 PM by IFwanderer
1 2 We are what we pretend to be, so we must be careful about what we pretend to be. -KV