Nov 2023 Mod notice:
There may be other, more specific, threads about some aspects of US politics, but this one tends to act as a hub for all sorts of related news and information, so it's usually one of the busiest OTC threads.
If you're new to OTC, it's worth reading the Introduction to On-Topic Conversations
and the On-Topic Conversations debate guidelines
before posting here.
Rumor-based, fear-mongering and/or inflammatory statements that damage the quality of the thread will be thumped. Off-topic posts will also be thumped. Repeat offenders may be suspended.
If time spent moderating this thread remains a distraction from moderation of the wiki itself, the thread will need to be locked. We want to avoid that, so please follow the forum rules
when posting here.
In line with the general forum rules, 'gravedancing' is prohibited here. If you're celebrating someone's death or hoping that they die, your post will get thumped. This rule applies regardless of what the person you're discussing has said or done.
Edited by Mrph1 on Nov 30th 2023 at 11:03:59 AM
This may be a thing for the Military Thread, but whatever happened to soldiers being issued drugs (tobacco and alcohol at least, I think there was morphine for some time), as a matter of course, on taxpayer money?
Darkness cannot drive out darkness; only light can do that. Hate cannot drive out hate; only love can do that.Shit, I'd have a lot less to complain about if they did that. But the last time there were government funded cigarettes for troops that I know of they were in C-Rations, which got shelved in the early eighties.
I don't know that Americans have ever had alcohol in our rations, or that "The Government" has ever bought me beer, beyond other troops buying beer which I consume, or me having to pay for it in government establishments.
Morphine is for medics, it's kept away from the general population for very good reasons.
I've heard of them trying all sorts of wonky prescription drugs on pilots to keep them awake for longer, but as far as I know nothing's been pushed on me, at least not with my knowledge.
edited 24th May '13 1:11:02 AM by Barkey
I know pushing speed on most kinds of troops was popular in the Korean War... <shrugs> Kind of a hangover from doing it in WWII.
And, nobody quite knows what, exactly, was in the Gulf War cocktail. <_< Plenty of suspicion of what was in there... but, little confirmation.
edited 24th May '13 1:57:37 AM by Euodiachloris
So the sun gods are doped, huh?
Well, I'm asking cause I was reading about World War I, and French soldiers were very keen on their government-granted right to a certain amount of (bad) tobacco and (bad) alcohol per week. I don't know about the rest.
Anyway, the question, as relevant to this thread, is; would that be a good idea? Besides the fact that alcohol is a bit of a hazard to the health of citizens (and, in the case of soldiers and other risky professions, hazardous on two accounts), there seems to be some sort of prejudice against the government funding "fun". The other week I heard someone complain that Obama's performance at the Correspondents Dinner was an act of disrespect, and that, as he is working with public money, he should be focusing on getting work done, rather than cracking jokes. I was more than a little taken aback by that, but, on the surface, he seemed right. I'm still sure there's something deeply wrong about it, I just can't seem to lay my finger on it... any help?
Darkness cannot drive out darkness; only light can do that. Hate cannot drive out hate; only love can do that.If he cancelled the dinner, people would have screamed about breaking traditions and the like.
The correspondence dinner is not for the sake of his personal entertainement, but part of his job as the head of state to represent. And he did it good, he appeared to have a good time, so its just another attempt to smear him in the ongoing crusade against his person.
Lots of people who scream disrespect are hypocrites anyway.
edited 24th May '13 2:19:36 AM by 3of4
"You can reply to this Message!"![]()
The very unhealthy thing in France was the free pack of cigs offered with your uniform when entering mandatory service.
This hooked up a lot of youth to tobacco (at least mandatory service was canceled altogether before it had a chance to find me).
edited 24th May '13 2:14:34 AM by Medinoc
"And as long as a sack of shit is not a good thing to be, chivalry will never die."Most of the bitching about Obama during the Correspondents' Dinner comes from people who had no problem when Bush did the exact same goddamn thing at his Correspondents' Dinner.
It's a fundraiser event where they get to kick back and doof around for a bit — a completely healthy thing to do in any profession, even politics. A few of the jokes will inevitably hit a bit too close to home because comedy does that, but for the most part there's absolutely nothing wrong with that.
edited 24th May '13 2:35:05 AM by Pykrete
I happen to know that this particular complainer voted for him and otherwise supports him, he just thinks that dinner is a silly use of taxpayer money.
I myself tend to find that fund-raising events are a bit offensive, given that what they're all about is begging and applauding at rich people to get them to voluntarily share some wealth for some purpose, completely in their own terms. I'd much rather have them be heavily taxed whether they like it or not, and then have the money funneled to causes of public interest through the citizenry's action. Mandatory solidarity, not voluntary charity.
edited 24th May '13 2:40:19 AM by TheHandle
Darkness cannot drive out darkness; only light can do that. Hate cannot drive out hate; only love can do that.
That's really grimdark.
![]()
Where I live, people don't give to charity, because they already pay quite a bit in taxes. The government would fund those projects, because people would be interested in them. Especially local councils, they're the ones that usually do the frivolous kinds of spending, for obvious reasons.
Charitable donations offset taxes, so the mere existence of high taxes shouldn't be a dissuasion to giving money. Sounds more like an excuse to me.
"It's Occam's Shuriken! If the answer is elusive, never rule out ninjas!"Also, there are some people who donate TONS of money and like the personal connection/feeling of accomplishment for donating directly to a cause you like. And knowing that none of your money is going to a cause you don't like.
Not disagreeing here, just providing the counter argument to show why that reason for raising taxes doesn't go over very well.
Yu hav nat sein bod speeling unntil know. (cacke four undersandig tis)the cake is a lie!Yeah, but I wasn't talking about "most people." I was talking about the ones who have enough money to give away. "Most people" don't donate to all the causes they like simply because they can't afford it.
AKA: I was talking about the people who actually have the power to make/influence those decisions.
edited 24th May '13 7:35:17 AM by Belian
Yu hav nat sein bod speeling unntil know. (cacke four undersandig tis)the cake is a lie!It would appear that people of little or average wealth donate much more, proportionately speaking, than the very wealthy. It is postulated that this has something to do with solidarity/relatability. The point of raising taxes is to compensate for this discrepancy, among others.
I will confess that, today, I find myself fairly biased against the very rich. I've just finished reading The Great Gatsby, and it's coloring my perceptions quite a bit. I feel the persistent need to kick something.
Darkness cannot drive out darkness; only light can do that. Hate cannot drive out hate; only love can do that.Obama fails to return Marine's salute
Senator Murphy (D-CT) loses 6 pounds on food stamp challenge
edited 24th May '13 12:31:44 PM by DeviantBraeburn
Everything is Possible. But some things are more Probable than others. JEBAGEDDON 2016Not returning the salute was a stupid goof to make so soon after that umbrella controversy. I'm not sure if he actually has to salute the Marines, since he is not and never has been a serving military officer (I'm sure a miltroper can clarify), but I suppose it has become convention that the President does so. Still, a personal apology and a handshake should be enough to patch things over. I assume it is just absentmindedness, though he really should have known better, given how salutes have always been Serious Business to all militaries.
Schild und Schwert der ParteiMassachusetts 2013 Senate Race: Gabriel Gomez calls Representative Ed Markey ‘pond scum’

Considering that the cars that fell in are only half submerged, probably no one really harmed in that bridge collapse.
Now PLEASE use this as an example of why we need to be improving our infrastructure. "If this bridge could collapse without warning, then imagine how much worse it would have been if [insert bridge that has a lower integrity score and higher traffic] collapsed."
Yu hav nat sein bod speeling unntil know. (cacke four undersandig tis)the cake is a lie!