Nov 2023 Mod notice:
There may be other, more specific, threads about some aspects of US politics, but this one tends to act as a hub for all sorts of related news and information, so it's usually one of the busiest OTC threads.
If you're new to OTC, it's worth reading the Introduction to On-Topic Conversations
and the On-Topic Conversations debate guidelines
before posting here.
Rumor-based, fear-mongering and/or inflammatory statements that damage the quality of the thread will be thumped. Off-topic posts will also be thumped. Repeat offenders may be suspended.
If time spent moderating this thread remains a distraction from moderation of the wiki itself, the thread will need to be locked. We want to avoid that, so please follow the forum rules
when posting here.
In line with the general forum rules, 'gravedancing' is prohibited here. If you're celebrating someone's death or hoping that they die, your post will get thumped. This rule applies regardless of what the person you're discussing has said or done.
Edited by Mrph1 on Nov 30th 2023 at 11:03:59 AM
...So the logic goes that Democrats, the large majority of which are fighting for the legalization of same-sex marriage, are discriminating against gays for introducing a bill that would give new rights to married partners, while Fox News, which is fighting against the legalization of same-sex marriage and, thus, against gays getting any of the benefits of marriage, which would now include this, are not discriminating against gays? Good to know.
Overgeneralizing about what, their treatment of gays? Being against them is the party line and anybody that isn't following it will be branded a traitor come the primaries.
edit: Actually I do know a few Republicans with a more Libertarian bent that think gay marriage should be legal. They don't fight for it like liberals though which is probably why it's not talked about often.
edited 19th Apr '13 7:07:35 PM by Kostya
![]()
That's true but the party line is against those things and given the party's recent history I think they'll start purging those types soon.
Okay what is the logic behind not giving lesbian women protection from abuse? They're still women.
Trans women is one thing because they're probably stupid enough to argue that it would only apply if you're born a woman but lesbians are women no matter what definition you use. Why would they not be included in a bill that gives rights to women?
Things have been trending away from them for a long time. I think they're finally starting to realize that all these young people, women, and minorities that are opposing them aren't just going to go away. They're getting more numerous while their primary demographic is shrinking.
They're not about to die out yet but if they continue on this path it will probably happen within the next twenty years.
edit: Just look at these exit polls.
The Democrats lead in women by 10%, young people by 23%, non-whites by between 50% and 90%, etc. Those are statistically significant numbers and I think they're starting to realize that younger people won't become more conservative as they age. If they don't do something soon they'll have effectively lost those demographics forever which really screws them now that they're starting to outnumber older white people.
edited 19th Apr '13 7:19:15 PM by Kostya
The problem the Republican Party faces is that the far-right refuses to be pragmatic and shuns all moderates as RIN Os. And as Karl Rove's fall from grace and CPAC 2013's overall tone shows the far-right have managed to sustain a significant amount of power within the party.
edited 19th Apr '13 7:25:56 PM by DeviantBraeburn
Everything is Possible. But some things are more Probable than others. JEBAGEDDON 2016![]()
I don't think people will do that. Most of those that are nostalgic for the good old days are old people that have always been conservative. They never wanted societal progress to begin with.
You're saying everyone that supports gay marriage and such would suddenly change their minds when they're older and want it to be illegal again. That's not really how it works from what I can tell. The general trend in society is towards more tolerance, not less.
edited 19th Apr '13 7:26:14 PM by Kostya
I'm worried those nostalgic for "a more moral America" will actually gain more power and get people to agree with them by the time of the next presidential election.
Hmm...good point. I doubt gay marriage will even be an issue a decade later, if it gets legalized, and people will be more tolerant. I guess that fear was unfounded.
edited 20th Apr '13 9:08:25 AM by Wildcard
They are already trying to do that and they're getting stomped on. That's one of the things the Republicans are using to build themselves up.
It's possible that the next generation might not support gay rights and stuff as much as the this one but I doubt it will suddenly be viewed as evil again. The genie is out of the bottle so to speak and I doubt it will be put back in, not when it has such massive support among the youth and the GOP itself is fighting a civil war over it.

To be fair, Bush himself doesn't appear to care about being in the public eye. Comparisons between the Bushes and the Obamas seems to reveal the Bushes to have been homebodies that preferred keeping their private life private. *shrug*
Still don't think his brother stands much chance of being nominated, though. Two Bushes as presidents seems to have been enough for this country.