Nov 2023 Mod notice:
There may be other, more specific, threads about some aspects of US politics, but this one tends to act as a hub for all sorts of related news and information, so it's usually one of the busiest OTC threads.
If you're new to OTC, it's worth reading the Introduction to On-Topic Conversations
and the On-Topic Conversations debate guidelines
before posting here.
Rumor-based, fear-mongering and/or inflammatory statements that damage the quality of the thread will be thumped. Off-topic posts will also be thumped. Repeat offenders may be suspended.
If time spent moderating this thread remains a distraction from moderation of the wiki itself, the thread will need to be locked. We want to avoid that, so please follow the forum rules
when posting here.
In line with the general forum rules, 'gravedancing' is prohibited here. If you're celebrating someone's death or hoping that they die, your post will get thumped. This rule applies regardless of what the person you're discussing has said or done.
Edited by Mrph1 on Nov 30th 2023 at 11:03:59 AM
here's my answer as to why. Because you didn't earn that money on your own, you earned it with the help of a society that has to be paid for. Because as someone who can easily afford to contribute you should, not because you can afford it, but because your shoulders are broader then those with less and it is thus right that you carry more weight. Because the strong should carry the weak, because that is there moral duty as a repayment for a society that was a big part in them making that money.
You benefited more from society then the poor guy, so you should pay more.
“And the Bunny nails it!” ~ Gabrael “If the UN can get through a day without everyone strangling everyone else so can we.” ~ CyranAgain, I have NO issue with paying more. It is the privilege of the wealthy to pass that on so that the next girl/guy can make it. That's the duty of every Christian, every American, every human being.
But.......I am also entitled to enjoy my money. If I earn more, it's not for the government to suddenly decide it needs more. Tax me in proportion to what I make, don't raise taxes for no other reason than I made a lot of money. That's not fair.
It was an honorStar I'm confused as whether you want a flat tax or a progressive tax.
The Crystal Caverns A bird's gotta sing.I look at it this way.
Society is a bit like a really really big caravan. And expenses are a bit like the many many things a large caravan would have to carry with them to survive.
Now not every one in this caravan is of equal strength. Some have better made wagons or stronger horses. Some have back problems or are old or are too young. Some might have a head cold and, if we give them a moment's respite, will gladly contribute more than their share tomorrow.
Now the caravan can either split up the weight equally and loose resources and people as they struggle and fail to carry their fair load. Or they stronger ones, with the better wagons and horses can pick the slack so that the whole procession proceeds just a little bit smoother.
You guys want to keep penalize high earners. I say, "How 'bout this? Don't tax the poor at all. Progressively tax the kinda/sorts wealthy. And then set a high, but FLAT, rate on the really rich.
That way, I get to enjoy my profits, you get the money you need so that the next troper can write The Next Big Story and get rich, and everyone's happy.
edited 4th Apr '13 1:22:24 PM by TheStarshipMaxima
It was an honorSo you want a tax system that's even more progressive then the one we currently have?
The Crystal Caverns A bird's gotta sing.I want....both, I guess. I want no taxes on those making less than $40,000. I want a progressive tax between $200,000 and $4 million. And then I want a 36.8% flat tax on everything $5.6 million and above.
EDIT: And if you try to hide your money, we seize your accounts and you lose your citizenship.
edited 4th Apr '13 1:26:10 PM by TheStarshipMaxima
It was an honorBut you got more help, so you should pay a higher percentage. No one is saying you can't enjoy your money, but if you look at what the richest do with their money, they aren't enjoying it. They are putting it in vaults and not touching it. Likewise we do need more, if the government ever reaches a point where it doesn't need extra money we can talk about cutting taxes, but we are nowhere near that point.
“And the Bunny nails it!” ~ Gabrael “If the UN can get through a day without everyone strangling everyone else so can we.” ~ CyranI don't buy that. That sounds like Huffington Post talk. Greater success does not automatically equal greater help. It could just as easily mean I simply used the available means at my disposable better than someone else did.
It was an honorCan someone who knows the nitty gritty of economics explain why that tax plan wouldn't work? (I know for a fact that the TLDR version is "not enough funding")
The Crystal Caverns A bird's gotta sing.Yeah, sadly Starship setting the top tax rate that low is regressive even if it is better than it is now. Do you know what the average middle class family gets taxed now? It's more than 33%. About 60% on the very wealthy seems to be the sweet spot for encouraging the economy on all levels. The very wealthy enjoy the fruits of their wealth, and there's enough funds for everyone to have a social safety net letting the poor climb out of poverty.
Reality is that, which when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away. -Philip K. DickAssuming you mean the Starship Progressive Taxation System, it's because I'm an evil right-winger, and we all know all they're ideas suck.
I swear nobody reads my posts. The near 40% flat rate is on those making over $5.6 million. Your hypothetical family wouldn't be taxed that. If the household income came out to less than $40,000 per person, they'd pay nothing in my system.
edited 4th Apr '13 1:29:16 PM by TheStarshipMaxima
It was an honorThere's a difference between evil and not knowing a thing about economics. If the latter was evil I'd be evil.
The Crystal Caverns A bird's gotta sing.I don't care how I came about it, if the government needs my money for taxes to help everyone than I should give them what I can reasonably be asked. Where we differ is what "reasonably" is.
If I don't like what my government is doing than I can change it with my votes and what I choose to spend money on.
Governor Perry offers $100,000 reward for information on prosecutors' killers
Eric Holder takes $10,750 sequester pay cut in gesture to Justice Department workers
Obama 'optimistic' on immigration reform; gun control 'tougher'

I have long said I vehemently oppose tax loopholes and tax shelters. In Starshipland, your citizenship would be revoked for trying to hide your money from the government.
Fucking disgusting, parasitic, cowardly, traitorous, thieves. All of them.
It was an honor