Nov 2023 Mod notice:
There may be other, more specific, threads about some aspects of US politics, but this one tends to act as a hub for all sorts of related news and information, so it's usually one of the busiest OTC threads.
If you're new to OTC, it's worth reading the Introduction to On-Topic Conversations
and the On-Topic Conversations debate guidelines
before posting here.
Rumor-based, fear-mongering and/or inflammatory statements that damage the quality of the thread will be thumped. Off-topic posts will also be thumped. Repeat offenders may be suspended.
If time spent moderating this thread remains a distraction from moderation of the wiki itself, the thread will need to be locked. We want to avoid that, so please follow the forum rules
when posting here.
In line with the general forum rules, 'gravedancing' is prohibited here. If you're celebrating someone's death or hoping that they die, your post will get thumped. This rule applies regardless of what the person you're discussing has said or done.
Edited by Mrph1 on Nov 30th 2023 at 11:03:59 AM
No. He was center/center left socially.
His economic policies, by and large, were, charitable put, a scam.
However, it was only after him that things really started to go downhill.
However, his treatment of AIDS was damn near criminal, and his war on Drug was stupid beyond belief.
edited 4th Apr '13 12:12:51 PM by DrTentacles
@Starship: Er, they don't currently pay for abortions. That's a myth. Well, save in cases where it would save the life of a mother. The abortion bit of Planned Parenthood and the like is paid by private donations. Not the government. The only way to get the government to pay for your abortion is to be dying and even then sometimes they still just let the woman die.
Reality is that, which when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away. -Philip K. Dick
Huh? Wait, so what was all this about blocking the provisions in Obamacare that force coverage for abortions? That whole thing with the Georgetown student and Rush Limbaugh, etc?
Sadly, I can't argue with this.
edited 4th Apr '13 12:14:43 PM by TheStarshipMaxima
It was an honorI blame him for the fashion trends of the eighties. So anything is justified.
I wish rich people had to pay more taxes, maybe then our economic problems would be slightly better.
It might just be forcing if it saves the mother's life. So that nobody dies on the table again for that reason.
edited 4th Apr '13 12:15:36 PM by Wildcard
Basically Reagan's name, like Jesus's, tends to get invoked as a justification for doing some awful shit. "That he would of wanted it this way.".
That and Reagan basically let the extremist wings of his part have more of a voice than they should as a result of electoral strategies. Basically he legitimized a lot of problems that have come to fruition now.
edited 4th Apr '13 12:17:59 PM by PotatoesRock
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
That wasn't Reagan, that was Barry Goldwater
Alabama Legislature Passes New Limits on Abortion Clinics
edited 4th Apr '13 12:16:56 PM by DeviantBraeburn
Everything is Possible. But some things are more Probable than others. JEBAGEDDON 2016Obamacare can't use contributor money for abortions - the Stupak-Pitts amendment -, and other parts of the federal goverment can't do that either. That's what I recall, anyhow.
I am sure Rush and co. claiming otherwise are just making up things.
edited 4th Apr '13 12:16:22 PM by SeptimusHeap
"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard FeynmanThe Obamacare abortions thing is lies made up by the conservative media, people over reacting about birth control, and emergency surgery. It does not in any way cover elective abortions. It will cover you if something goes wrong with your pregnancy, you start haemorrhaging uncontrollably, and they have to give you an abortion to stop you from dying. There are some people who are very opposed to that last bit.
Reality is that, which when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away. -Philip K. DickHuckabee Rebukes Critics Who Dismiss Hilter/Obama Gun Control Comparisons: ‘It’s The Truth'
It's not so much "penalize the rich" as "The rich need to oblige to the social contract", and one of the things of a society whose social contract is working is generally the rich are the ones who have to foot the bill to improve tings for their fellow man, because they're the only ones with the excess cash to do so.
One of the problems with the U.S. is that a sizable number of wealthy people have effectively gone "fuck the social contract and Nobless Oblige".
Reagan was more right-wing than people think. I've been reading Krugman, and he started his political career by, essentially, appealing to racist fears among California's white voters. He was the first major movement conservative to learn how to mask his agenda in politically correct terms, while speaking the correct hidden language to let white voters know he was on their side.
It's actually rather amazing; after the Goldwater debacle, Reagan showed the modern Republican party how it could become mainstream and succeed. We have him to thank for much of what transpired since — even if his politics seem liberal now by comparison with today's conservatives, he started the ball rolling.
"It's Occam's Shuriken! If the answer is elusive, never rule out ninjas!"Goddamn Critical Research Failure!
re: penalizing the rich - Well, the reason I say that is because taxes go up and up the more money you make, but does that mean you're using more and more of the government's services.
That's why I get the concept of a flat tax. If I wrote The Adventures of Wildcard and Starship, a cross between Star Trek and Starsky And Hutch, and it sold 1 million copies, I got no beef with the government taking it's 20%.
But then I write Wildcard and Starship vs. the Space Nazis and it sells 10 million copies, now suddenly the government wants 30%. Well of course, I'm like, "why?"
It was an honorWhy are republican politicians acting like their party is dying? I know I asked this this morning but I still don't understand it. They seem so paranoid about their power and the fact that they have less approval among young people lately. They had to acknowledge that there was a high possibility Obama was going to get reelected since he was the incumbent.
Because we can pay it and still be rich after the tax.
edited 4th Apr '13 12:27:47 PM by Wildcard
Well...shit. I guess this is the part where you have a good laugh at my expense Shima.
It was an honorThe government needs taxes. The poor can afford less than the Rich. Either we set a flat tax too high, and the poor are fucked, or too low, and the Government's dying.
It's not like the Rich are suddenly going to be poor from the Tax, or even much less rich. It's not like they can't afford it, or there's still not an incentive for making money.
Because your 30% isn't as hard hitting to a poorer person at 30%. Wealth after a certain point is only good for luxuries. Wealth below a certain point however negatively impacts a person.
Again, the rich are able to live very comfortably at 30~50% of their income being taxed. The poor ain't. They'd be screwed.
Basically your income, if used correctly by politicians, goes to Infrastructure and Social Services. Social Services take the burdens of paying the bills and help insure preventative healthcare (a major issue in this country). Meanwhile, infrastructure and government related work can in theory enable part of the population.
That increase of work gives more money to the poorer people. The poorer people have more money? They can buy more of your books for themselves or others as a dispoable luxury. Ergo you get more money.
Mind you, this is absurdly over simplifying things.
edited 4th Apr '13 12:46:39 PM by PotatoesRock
So did Nixon. Look at how "conservative" his policies turned out.
There is a large difference between Regan's polices and his rhetoric.
For Example:
Reagan promised to repeal Roe vs Wade. Not only did he not do that, he appointed Sandra O'Conner to the Supreme Court (much to the disdain of the Religious Right).
Reagan mocked environmentalism by saying 'A tree's a tree. How many more do you need to look at?' in his 1966 Gubernatorial campaign, but as Governor he endorsed the Redwoods National Park and the Wild and Scenic Rivers System.
And for all of his 'Evil Empire!' rhetoric; he was still very willing to engage in talks with Gorbachev.
Sadly many Right-Wingers would rather judge Reagan by his speeches rather than his actual decisions.
edited 4th Apr '13 1:05:28 PM by DeviantBraeburn
Everything is Possible. But some things are more Probable than others. JEBAGEDDON 2016

Reagan actually said this regarding gays in the military, "What matters is if a soldier can shoot straight, not if they are straight."
Reagan wasn't teh anti-Christ no matter what Fighteer says.
It was an honor