Nov 2023 Mod notice:
There may be other, more specific, threads about some aspects of US politics, but this one tends to act as a hub for all sorts of related news and information, so it's usually one of the busiest OTC threads.
If you're new to OTC, it's worth reading the Introduction to On-Topic Conversations
and the On-Topic Conversations debate guidelines
before posting here.
Rumor-based, fear-mongering and/or inflammatory statements that damage the quality of the thread will be thumped. Off-topic posts will also be thumped. Repeat offenders may be suspended.
If time spent moderating this thread remains a distraction from moderation of the wiki itself, the thread will need to be locked. We want to avoid that, so please follow the forum rules
when posting here.
In line with the general forum rules, 'gravedancing' is prohibited here. If you're celebrating someone's death or hoping that they die, your post will get thumped. This rule applies regardless of what the person you're discussing has said or done.
Edited by Mrph1 on Nov 30th 2023 at 11:03:59 AM
Nice find there Taoist. He seems to be well versed on the subject matter and all too aware of how the GOP has screwed them selves when it comes to minorities/civil rights. Of course no one on the right is truly going to listen to him.
Nice to see that good old Cheney is still being a ideologue who attacks Obama for doing the same things as Bush (albeit more effectively). http://www.salon.com/2013/02/11/dick_cheney_helps_his_cousin/
edited 11th Feb '13 9:29:09 PM by Rationalinsanity
Politics is the skilled use of blunt objects.
pretty much. Republican writers tend to fall into two categories these days.
people who realize their party is falling apart at the seams and has married itself directly to the angry , paranoid, 60 year old + white man
or people who are so panicked by the re-election of Obama that they have decided that conservativism didnt fail, america failed conservativism
Nice to see a short-but-good explanation on how a lot of the "slavery" issues were more about National vs State rights (and anti-Communism) and not about race. Also explains how that ended up being twisted around for today's "nullistic" tendencies.
One thing it didn't mention explicitly is why current "50-60 years old Republican white guys" are so set in their ways: The basis for their ideology started gaining the current political traction when they first started paying attention to politics. Add on to that the ideology focuses on being strong willed and against the political majority, and it makes a certain amount of sense why they are so entrenched in their ways.
This is the first time I feel that I can actually understand where those sorts of people, and that sort of ideology, come from and am tearing up over it. I like understanding the other viewpoint (and playing Devil's Advocate) even if I don't agree with it. Now that finally have a basis of understanding for these people, I am resigning myself to the fact that I will never be able to reach an agreement/compromise with a lot of them.
Yu hav nat sein bod speeling unntil know. (cacke four undersandig tis)the cake is a lie!Yeah, that's the rub. Understanding, in this instance, only helps to convey the absolute intractability of the other side's politics. In the end, we do best to wait for the population of 1960s conservatives to die off and/or fade into irrelevancy.
In a normal situation, you'd think that understanding your opponent's point of view would lead to the ability to find an avenue of compromise, but not here. It's actually the opposite; you feel like you should be able to reach a compromise only when you don't fully understand the source of their political opinions.
One wonders if President Obama has fallen into this trap. Or at least, whether he did in his first term. This time around he seems to be learning.
edited 12th Feb '13 6:56:40 AM by Fighteer
"It's Occam's Shuriken! If the answer is elusive, never rule out ninjas!"Maldito sinvergüenza comemierda hijo de la gran puta...
Share it so that people can get into this conversation, 'cause we're not the only ones who think like this.The thinkprogress article on that says all twenty two who voted against it were male Republicans. Anyway, it's gone on to the House now and will apparently still have trouble because the bill also has provisions for protecting tribal women. And we can't have that for some reason.
http://thinkprogress.org/special/2013/02/12/1576251/republicans-citizenship-obama/
Also that.
If they vote it down to protect the freedom of men to rape native women without fear of the law taking their crime seriously, I'm gonna need to kick something. I hope Maddow and Stewart savage them over that.
Share it so that people can get into this conversation, 'cause we're not the only ones who think like this.Doesn't Rubio want to run for POTUS? He is going to be savaged in the general election for voting against this. The GOP has a women problem and this is not fucking helping.
edited 12th Feb '13 5:01:27 PM by Kostya
I kinda wonder why liberals are looking to Hillary as some kind of King Arthur who will return to save our country in 2016. Isn't it a little early for the Democrats to start picking their candidate?
It may just be me, but that article seems a bit too... exuberant to really be classified as good journalism.
"It's Occam's Shuriken! If the answer is elusive, never rule out ninjas!"How soon after the issuing of the State of the Union Address is a transcript made for public viewing/download? (If it is at all). I am listening to it just now and there are some good points Barry is making and others that make me twitch a bit, but I am so tired I really can't tell which is which just now.
That not just Hillary, remember Obama in 2008 ? he also have a lot of enthusiastic followers. And not just Liberal, look at Palin supporters.
There is always journalist and people that see politics as team sports and celebrity soap opera, so star players like Obama / Hillary / Palin believed will win the game and save the team.
Hillary also believed from soap opera factor, continuity porn like Kennedy Family or Bush Family, have lots of fans.
![]()
And anyone who tries to protest it will look like a lunatic.
"No I don't want to pay my employees enough so that they can reach living expenses." That would go over well.
edited 12th Feb '13 7:29:03 PM by Zendervai
FINALLY.

Interesting article.
Also a surprising level of self-awareness that you don't see in every self-professed conservative. Historically accurate or no?
Share it so that people can get into this conversation, 'cause we're not the only ones who think like this.