Nov 2023 Mod notice:
There may be other, more specific, threads about some aspects of US politics, but this one tends to act as a hub for all sorts of related news and information, so it's usually one of the busiest OTC threads.
If you're new to OTC, it's worth reading the Introduction to On-Topic Conversations
and the On-Topic Conversations debate guidelines
before posting here.
Rumor-based, fear-mongering and/or inflammatory statements that damage the quality of the thread will be thumped. Off-topic posts will also be thumped. Repeat offenders may be suspended.
If time spent moderating this thread remains a distraction from moderation of the wiki itself, the thread will need to be locked. We want to avoid that, so please follow the forum rules
when posting here.
In line with the general forum rules, 'gravedancing' is prohibited here. If you're celebrating someone's death or hoping that they die, your post will get thumped. This rule applies regardless of what the person you're discussing has said or done.
Edited by Mrph1 on Nov 30th 2023 at 11:03:59 AM
Nope. I'm still blaming you.
You Brits should have pushed for an actual central government in the EU, and the fact that you only have one foot trough the doorway (metaphorically speaking) is probably one of the main reasons there is no actual central government.
edited 19th Nov '12 5:43:57 PM by Ekuran
I suppose I'm sort of the opposite of people like Grizzly, who dislike parts of the GOP platform but stick with them for their social policy. I like a lot of their platform (gun rights, death penalty, military spending) but their social and economic policies are dealbreakers for me.
Really from Jupiter, but not an alien.Hollande is a Socialist, not a Communist.
That's almost correct. It was the debt ceiling crisis of 2011.
edited 19th Nov '12 5:51:23 PM by BestOf
Quod gratis asseritur, gratis negatur.![]()
![]()
That's great for you, but our right-wing nutjobs will still have bullshit ammunition for a decade or so.
![]()
Nah, I think they're more of socialist or something along those lines.
Edit: Best Of, why you ninja me? Not cool, man, not cool.
edited 19th Nov '12 5:55:15 PM by Ekuran
Meanwhile, I like pretty much nothing about the GOP platform. From the death penalty to the economics to abortion to gay marriage to the military. I like some, but not all, of the Democrat platform (also, there needs to be some sort of nickname for them, sort of like GOP :/). I like pretty much every part of the Green and Peace and Freedom platforms.
Also, yay Communism~
If you want to see what a French Socialist would do as President, see here
and compare that to what you would consider "Left-of-Centre." (Or rather, "Commie-of-Center".)
Note that Hollande is not a radical, and neither does he represent the far-Left.
Some points of Hollande's programme:
- Energy: endorses reducing the share of electricity generated by nuclear power in France from 75 to 50% in favour of renewable energy sources.
- Tax revenues above 1,000,000 euros per year at a 75% rate (rates for part of the income below a million not changed).
- Taxation: supports the merger of income tax and the General Social Contribution (CSG), the creation of an additional 45% for additional income of 150,000 euros, capping tax loopholes at a maximum of €10,000 per year, and questioning the relief solidarity tax on wealth (ISF, Impôt de Solidarité sur la Fortune) measure that should bring €29 billion in additional revenue.
- Education: supports the recruitment of 60,000 civil servants (new teachers), the creation of a study allowance and means-tested training, setting up a mutually beneficial contract that would allow a generation of experienced employees and craftsmen to be the guardians and teachers of younger newly hired employees, thereby creating a total of 150,000 subsidized jobs.
- Hollande supports same-sex marriage and adoption for LGBT couples, and has plans to pursue the issue in early 2013
edited 19th Nov '12 5:59:05 PM by BestOf
Quod gratis asseritur, gratis negatur.
So you want communism, but not communism?
Didn't Britain just elect a conservative?
![]()
![]()
When humans reach a higher level of enlightenment, I hope they'll realize Communism was a horrible idea.
edited 19th Nov '12 6:21:46 PM by DeviantBraeburn
Everything is Possible. But some things are more Probable than others. JEBAGEDDON 2016The only proper way for communism to work is for us to live in a post-singularity/post-scarcity society (although the former has a less-than-likely chance of killing us all or worse). Then again, by that point, we probably won't even need a government, but whatever.
I still hold socialist views, though, since a socialist society is the closest we can come to a potopia (it's a thing I made up which means "closest possible thing to what people would consider a Utopia").
Also, I like this Hollande guy. He'll definitely be better than Sarkozy.
dp wants a socialist society that's almost, but not quite, like communism. That is, it's only the slightest bit capitalist.
edited 19th Nov '12 6:14:54 PM by Ekuran
![]()
![]()
More like, socialist, but not quite communist.
![]()
Post-scarcity is more likely to allow for true communism than post-singularity.
One simple thing that I think we should change that would lead to a much more fair system would be to get rid of inheritance, and allow for everyone to start from the same point, rather than the children of rich people starting rich and the children of poor people starting poor. Of course, that would be a bitch to convince people to implement.
Well, that's because everyone thinks they should be able to leave their children something when they die. That's a large part of motivation for people when working, they idea that they can leave their children better off than themselves. Also, family businesses where children gladly inherit/take over are a thing at more than one social class/tax bracket. How would that factor in?
That said, inheritance tax is a thing.
edited 19th Nov '12 6:23:21 PM by AceofSpades
![]()
![]()
You got part of the meaning, therefore you win all the liberal cookies. Hehe.
Potopia actually stands for "Looks Possibly Utopianish", since I wanted something I can say when referring to a post-singularity world without people bitching at me about "naivety" and "Utopian bullshit blah blah".
Although the government handing out weed would be pretty Potopian.
![]()
Which is why it won't be implemented, unfortunately.
(Actual) compromise, to the rescue.
edited 19th Nov '12 6:24:39 PM by Ekuran
Two years ago, we got a hung parliament. Translated, that means "no real winner".
So, two parties had to cobble a workable mandate together, or we faced another General Election, with a high chance of another hung result.
The Conservative Leader became PM, simply due to being the senior partner in the Conservative-Liberal Democrat compact. <shrugs> However, had Labour and the Lib Dems been able to see eye-to-eye in their usual way, it'd've turned out differently. However, that would've been unlikely: the blame game was king. And, deregulation of the banking sector took place under New Labour most recently (although, Maggie did start it).
There: potted History.
edited 19th Nov '12 6:30:59 PM by Euodiachloris

Kostya: it would take a LOT of economy wrecking (relative to the alternative) to counteract the kind of good will that sensible copyright policy holds with me. We're talking "return to the gold standard, remove the minimum wage, etc" type.