Nov 2023 Mod notice:
There may be other, more specific, threads about some aspects of US politics, but this one tends to act as a hub for all sorts of related news and information, so it's usually one of the busiest OTC threads.
If you're new to OTC, it's worth reading the Introduction to On-Topic Conversations
and the On-Topic Conversations debate guidelines
before posting here.
Rumor-based, fear-mongering and/or inflammatory statements that damage the quality of the thread will be thumped. Off-topic posts will also be thumped. Repeat offenders may be suspended.
If time spent moderating this thread remains a distraction from moderation of the wiki itself, the thread will need to be locked. We want to avoid that, so please follow the forum rules
when posting here.
In line with the general forum rules, 'gravedancing' is prohibited here. If you're celebrating someone's death or hoping that they die, your post will get thumped. This rule applies regardless of what the person you're discussing has said or done.
Edited by Mrph1 on Nov 30th 2023 at 11:03:59 AM
they're not; they made that rule up themselves in order to look like they care.
"Never let the truth get in the way of a good story." Twitter![]()
Well, the Constitution establishes the right to petition for redress of grievances in the First Amendment, and it would appear that in the interests of transparency, the White House decided to make the process as open as possible, without passing judgement.
Let's not be quite that cynical. Just because you got 150 people to sign something doesn't make it reasonable.
edited 12th Nov '12 11:12:42 AM by Fighteer
"It's Occam's Shuriken! If the answer is elusive, never rule out ninjas!"He is right to be concerned. What I'm seeing and reading in some places, however, is the thought that this is cyclical. Right now, the minority groups are voting Democrat not necessarily because they're all a bunch of liberals — many come from very conservative cultural mindsets — but because the Republicans are so openly antagonistic towards them.
In a few decades, once these groups have fully integrated into society, the thought goes, they'll start to naturally adopt a more natural conservative/liberal political distribution, restoring the GOP's power.
I don't know how accurate that is, but I do know that a lot of Latinos and blacks are very religious. The GOP is looking at Whig-like irrelevancy in the next decade, but if they move to the center, they might yet save themselves.
The question now is whether that will happen. Will the party continue to double-down on reactionary conservatism? If so, I think it is truly doomed.
edited 12th Nov '12 11:36:17 AM by Fighteer
"It's Occam's Shuriken! If the answer is elusive, never rule out ninjas!"The only one of those petitions that sounds reasonable to me are the scientific journal one, and the gluten free labelling one. A lot of them are just silly and not government things.
edited 12th Nov '12 11:39:51 AM by shimaspawn
Reality is that, which when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away. -Philip K. DickHow much of it is cyclical or not, I think, depends in large part on what kinds of solutions we seek to the problems we face.
For example, if we seek comprehensive immigration reform, there's no reason to think that the increased racial diversity wouldn't benefit the Democrats overall. A Republican party that could support that would be a different kind of party from the one we know today. On the other hand, if we (by which I mean the government) just put out a bandaid specifically to appeal to Hispanics as a cynical move to grab the voters, then what will happen is that the Hispanics will fully integrate and then take their turn at oppressing the next minority that is still troubled by a fundamentally dysfunctional immigration system.
What people call 'cycles' in politics look, to me, to be closer to 'old problems coming back because we did a half-assed job of fixing them the first time.'
Furthermore, I think Guantanamo must be destroyed.Interesting theory: racism in politics is like herpes or chicken pox/shingles
. That's to say, when under stress, our immune system weakens and we see flareups.
These petitions are hilarious. I imagined it would only be about the deep-red states in the South which actually pulled that shit before, but no: here's one from New Jersey
.
I can see it now. The Independent Republic of New Jersey, with "Born To Run" as its national anthem.
Mache dich, mein Herze, rein...edited 12th Nov '12 12:13:54 PM by Fighteer
"It's Occam's Shuriken! If the answer is elusive, never rule out ninjas!"Some guy put up a petition for all of New England, on the basis that they shouldn't have to put up with every other state that appears to hate them for very little reason.
But anyway, these petitions aren't going anywhere so I don't think we should discuss them seriously. The White House is just being very open about who's complaining about what. (Which has the side effect of opening a lot of these people up to ridicule, as well as spreading their message.)
As regards "cyclical" I think it's cyclical in the sense that one of the parties has found some group to turn into the "other" that we need to fear. Kind of hard to do that now, when the "other" is a large enough part of the population to sway the vote.
Amazingly, as soon as they could get a good war going, all that hand-wringing over debt disappeared and we reaped the results in a regulated economy with low consumer debt and low income disparities, up until the collective memory of our politicians and economists faded and we started repeating the same mistakes as before.
It's the same story throughout human history. Massive hardship thanks to short-sightedness or plain old hidebound stupidity leads to some revolutionary development that gives us a few decades of prosperity, after which the short-sighted take over again and crash the system. I despair of us ever getting away from that cycle.
edited 12th Nov '12 12:20:36 PM by Fighteer
"It's Occam's Shuriken! If the answer is elusive, never rule out ninjas!"Krugman has argued that a fake alien invasion scare would get us back to full employment in no time flat. The point is that war is the one form of deficit spending that conservatives accept without question, so if we have a deadlocked government, one way to break that deadlock is to get a war started.
Of course, the modern military-industrial complex has seen to it that we can fight wars on the scale of Iraq and Afghanistan without putting the entire country on a wartime footing, thus having the disadvantages of deficit spending without the advantages of stimulus. It's the conservative economist's version of having one's cake and eating it too.
Also, Iraq and Afghanistan came during a boom, which meant that the deficit spending to fund them was inflationary, not stimulatory — and we lowered taxes at the same time, just to add fuel to the fire.
edited 12th Nov '12 12:28:52 PM by Fighteer
"It's Occam's Shuriken! If the answer is elusive, never rule out ninjas!"Now where did I put Ozy's phone number...
Writing a post-post apocalypse LitRPG on RR. Also fanfic stuff."It's the same story throughout human history. Massive hardship thanks to short-sightedness or plain old hidebound stupidity leads to some revolutionary development that gives us a few decades of prosperity, after which the short-sighted take over again and crash the system. I despair of us ever getting away from that cycle."
That seems like a collective version of a pitfall that human nature tends to stumble on - it has nothing to do with politicians and economists.
@gingrich link from earlier: I like that Newt is man enough to admit that maybe his vision of America is wrong and he should change. That's what we in the bizz call rational thought. Something that's incredibly rare in modern politics.
@fighteer: Someone incredibly savvy will eventually realize they can use all the anti-china sentiment to brew up their own cold war and both sides can massively profit from the faux-antagonism.
Speaking of which, and I know this is off-topic but I ain't crawling into the spoilerific thread; how's AC 3?
Is using "Julian Assange is a Hillary butt plug" an acceptable signature quote?@Trivialis: Well, it so happens that the current cycle is specifically and almost entirely the effect of conservative principles overriding hard-won common sense. I can't say that this holds true uniformly throughout history, but I can't think offhand of very many crises that were caused by liberal overreach. Before you scream "Communism", let me point out yet again that Lenin, Stalin, and Mao were authoritarians first, and Communists second.
@thatguythere: Regarding China, remember that both sides (well, all three sides if you count Russia) have nukes, and China outnumbers us by three to one. That kind of war would have all sorts of negative repercussions that wouldn't be very pleasant.
As for AC3, I'm avoiding the thread too. I'll get to play it on the 20th... eight days!
edited 12th Nov '12 12:41:35 PM by Fighteer
"It's Occam's Shuriken! If the answer is elusive, never rule out ninjas!"Ah, now that I will concede. Still, it makes a convincing argument that liberals bring prosperity and conservatives bring hardship. If you are the kind of person who feels that hardship is good for society, it stands to reason that you'd support these cycles. In all honesty, given human nature, I can't see a good way to continue the up-cycle without people getting lazy and complacent.
"It's Occam's Shuriken! If the answer is elusive, never rule out ninjas!"

The article is light on details, but it contains a work requirement and discusses opening more immigration for "needed jobs", which I assume would include farm and construction labor. It also mentions a new "secure form" that would allow employers to verify citizenship.
"It's Occam's Shuriken! If the answer is elusive, never rule out ninjas!"