Nov 2023 Mod notice:
There may be other, more specific, threads about some aspects of US politics, but this one tends to act as a hub for all sorts of related news and information, so it's usually one of the busiest OTC threads.
If you're new to OTC, it's worth reading the Introduction to On-Topic Conversations
and the On-Topic Conversations debate guidelines
before posting here.
Rumor-based, fear-mongering and/or inflammatory statements that damage the quality of the thread will be thumped. Off-topic posts will also be thumped. Repeat offenders may be suspended.
If time spent moderating this thread remains a distraction from moderation of the wiki itself, the thread will need to be locked. We want to avoid that, so please follow the forum rules
when posting here.
In line with the general forum rules, 'gravedancing' is prohibited here. If you're celebrating someone's death or hoping that they die, your post will get thumped. This rule applies regardless of what the person you're discussing has said or done.
Edited by Mrph1 on Nov 30th 2023 at 11:03:59 AM
Yeah, what I imagine would happen is that people like David Duke would set up white only charter schools and fudge the numbers to make it look like they're the best performing schools in the country. Astroturf movements would be set up to re-segregate schools based on this alleged "success". Next, gated communities would start driving out African Americans en masse, and without affirmative action laws, African Americans would probably be at a significant disadvantage in competitive areas like hiring and college admissions, creating a two-tiered society that only becomes further pronounced when you consider today's social inequalities. By having a black underclass, white people would have someone to feel superior to, thus granting votes to a conservative status quo. Whites becoming a minority due to birthrates or some crap like that? No problem, just repeal the Voting Rights Act as well!
They'll always find some justification for things, no matter how paper-thin. Take "Voter Fraud" for instance, it's a bullshit excuse to reinstate a poll tax on lower class (Read: Minority) Americans. The Civil Rights Act could probably be repealed on some charge that it's "A violation of the 10th Amendment", "A violation of private property rights", "A bureaucratic, vestigal entitlement from a society that's clearly moved on", or some crap like that.
EDIT: Turns out at least some libertarians are in favor of repealing '64. This is just... so wrong.
edited 23rd Oct '12 1:49:17 PM by AmateurPolymath
So emblematic of today's narrative- and charisma-based campaigns.
Then again, campaigns were always like this I guess. Now, where's my stash of hard cider in my log cabin...
Edit: Oh yeah, don't forget that log cabins and hard cider was one of the earliest major campaign lies. W.H. Harrison was not a frontier boy by any means. Jerk.
edited 23rd Oct '12 1:59:24 PM by GlennMagusHarvey
This really is a nailbiter.
http://www.cnn.com/2012/10/23/politics/campaign-stretch-run/index.html?hpt=hp_c1
Ok, Donald Trump is officially a moron. He's going to reveal...
...
...
Obama's divorce papers. Really. And he thinks this is going to affect the election.
@Kostya: I'm serious. Trump announced earlier this week that he would be revealing a "bombshell" which would change the course of the election. That's what he was going to reveal.
Very big Daydream Believer. "That's not knowledge, that's a crapshoot!" -Al Murray "Welcome to QI" -Stephen Fry![]()
![]()
I do and I don't hope they do that. I don't because I'd hate to have them resort to such an underhanded tactic but I kind of do since I'd hate for a lot of his policies to go into affect.
![]()
Okay, new question. Is this bullshit like the truther nonsense? I haven't heard of any problems between them.
edited 23rd Oct '12 3:53:11 PM by Kostya
I mean all the slander Obama's been getting, such as birther movement and this divorce Trump is trying to claim.
Obama has been called various names that don't even add up together. I definitely don't want that happening 4 years later regardless of who is elected. Whoever gets elected, we should help him administrate the country correctly.
edited 23rd Oct '12 3:54:04 PM by Trivialis
I doubt they'd do that. If the left was into that sort of thing Romney would have been getting slammed for being a Nazi or a Godless Mormon or some other bullshit for months. Since that hasn't been brought up at all I have a feeling they wouldn't start after he got elected primarily because it would make them look really fucking hypocritical.
edit: Why should we help them administrate the country if their policies will wreck it? I'm sorry but tax cuts for the rich, a two trillion budget increase, and several wars are not in this country's best interests.
edited 23rd Oct '12 3:57:42 PM by Kostya
So.
Them polls. They look slightly worrying (or maybe the ones I have are out-of-date).
This is the crucial last week. D:
I would be rather sad at a Romney win. That means my trip to Washington DC in Feb for school won't be so pleasant.
Anyways; I presume both campaign machines swing into full gear.
How do things... go, so to speak?
Have I mentioned how much I hate the concept of "state's rights"? Because I really do hate it.
edited 23rd Oct '12 4:13:59 PM by Enkufka
Very big Daydream Believer. "That's not knowledge, that's a crapshoot!" -Al Murray "Welcome to QI" -Stephen FryTalk about it here
. It's easy for this to derail into the same old conversation.

I give it about ten years.
Hugging a Vanillite will give you frostbite.