Nov 2023 Mod notice:
There may be other, more specific, threads about some aspects of US politics, but this one tends to act as a hub for all sorts of related news and information, so it's usually one of the busiest OTC threads.
If you're new to OTC, it's worth reading the Introduction to On-Topic Conversations
and the On-Topic Conversations debate guidelines
before posting here.
Rumor-based, fear-mongering and/or inflammatory statements that damage the quality of the thread will be thumped. Off-topic posts will also be thumped. Repeat offenders may be suspended.
If time spent moderating this thread remains a distraction from moderation of the wiki itself, the thread will need to be locked. We want to avoid that, so please follow the forum rules
when posting here.
In line with the general forum rules, 'gravedancing' is prohibited here. If you're celebrating someone's death or hoping that they die, your post will get thumped. This rule applies regardless of what the person you're discussing has said or done.
Edited by Mrph1 on Nov 30th 2023 at 11:03:59 AM
The big thing seems to be that he's a hypocrite, such as imposing lockdowns while still going out to parties himself.
My musician pageI shared this before, but since the California Democrat's bizarre arrogance is being raised up, Washington Post actually devoted a whole article analyzing the issue.
TL;DR, California has been so safely Democrat for the past decades that the state's Democrats have badly underestimated potential sources of opposition to them.
Washington Post: California's Democratic dominance may soon prove deadly
That's a lot for authorities to ask - especially when they appear so out of touch with the people they're trying to govern.
Many residents are furious over being asked to make sacrifices that state and local officials themselves won't. Newsom is by now notorious for his minimum $350-a-plate meal at the ultra-elite French Laundry in violation of his own guidance to Californians, exacerbated by his lie claiming the meal followed outdoor distancing policies.
The mayor of San Francisco, London Breed, had her own coronavirus-noncompliant dinner at the same tony venue. Los Angeles County Supervisor Sheila Kuehl was spotted dining alfresco at an Italian restaurant in Santa Monica not long after voting to ban outdoor dining for her 12 million fellow Angelenos. San Jose's mayor had to apologize after traveling to his parents' house for a Thanksgiving dinner in violation of state requirements. When five state lawmakers were busted dining out in Sacramento
this week by a reporter, one asked, "Can we not have dinner?" before pulling his mask out of his pocket.
Why are these officials so flagrantly violating rules they expect their own voters to follow? Is it arrogance? Delusion? Indifference? All of the above?
Perhaps. But I have another theory: The tone-deafness is what comes from living in a bubble where political competition is scant. In California, Democratic voters outnumber Republicans nearly 2-1. Only two Republicans have won statewide office since 2000. Newsom, Breed and Kuehl received 62 percent, 71 percent and 76 percent of the vote, respectively, in their last races.
In other words, it is precisely because California is so heavily Democratic that Democratic officials don't feel the need to be responsive to their constituents. But there is mounting evidence that even in this one-party state, voters are no longer unquestioningly swallowing what their leadership is feeding them.
In the case of the pandemic crackdown, residents are mounting resistance to lawmakers' hypocrisy. One county plans to challenge Newsom's covid-19 policies in court. Cities are exploring forming their own public health departments to avoid county-level restrictions. Sheriffs are refusing to enforce state curfews. Business owners are planning open rebellion.
This year's ballot initiatives, too, should raise alarms, as measures that Democratic tail winds should ordinarily have swept to victory instead went down to surprising defeat. One was Proposition 15, which sought to hike commercial property taxes, ostensibly to fund public schools (the state's teachers' union spent $20 million trying to push the measure through). Proposition 16, meanwhile, would have reinstated the use of affirmative action in California public university admissions and public sector hiring.
Both measures enjoyed overwhelming support from progressive activists, state Democratic elected officials and Newsom. And both should have benefited from anti-Trump turnout. But Prop. 15 received nearly 2.9 million fewer votes statewide than President-elect Joe Biden did. Prop. 16 trailed Biden by almost 3.9 million votes.
Newsom and state Democratic leaders were also embarrassed by Proposition 22. In September 2019, Assembly Bill 5 - a law mandating that companies treat "gig workers," such as Uber and Lyft drivers, like full-time employees - passed easily in the overwhelmingly Democratic state legislature, with a 29-11 vote in the state Senate and a 61-16 vote in the Assembly. The measure was eagerly signed into law by Newsom. Then Prop. 22 took the matter to voters, who decisively rejected their Democratic overlords - 59 percent to 41 percent.
These measures failed, in part, because their Democratic champions were clueless about where voters actually were on the issues. Prop. 15, for example, rested its hopes on an ambitious media blitz featuring teachers railing against corporate loopholes that allegedly deny schools deserved money. But at a time when shuttered schools and substandard virtual learning are shortchanging millions of California kids, was a plea for sympathy for teachers' unions a wise tactic?
These rebukes point to an unsettling phenomenon. Because relatively little is demanded of them, California's elected leaders have an easy time getting elected, but haven't yet mastered the part that comes after - leading.
Newsom, for example, was nurtured, educated and sent up the political ladder in a deep-blue range from Marin County to the southern end of Silicon Valley - coasting from one Democratic-friendly post to another, never having to develop shrewd professional and personal judgment. He and his fellow state and local lawmakers apparently still need to master the arts of convincing and persuading, of finding the right policies that appeal to broad coalitions, of being the role models they expect voters to follow.
In a few months, the embarrassments of failed ballot propositions will probably have faded. But in the case of the covid-19 resistance, Democratic officials' alienation from their voters could prove deadly. If there's a silver lining to the crisis, maybe it will be that it finally prompts complacent politicians such as Newsom to look beyond their own whims to what their voters actually want and need.
Edited by FluffyMcChicken on Dec 16th 2020 at 5:36:43 AM
Again, that's an Op-Ed, from a person who works at a conservative institution. Not to say California Democrats haven't had some serious missteps in recent days, but it's from a somewhat biased source. And Democratic ballot measures don't always get the support of Democratic politicians, especially tax hikes.
Re: Kevin Faulconer, so he's basically like Susan Collins or Baker/Scott, politically?
Edited by nova92 on Dec 16th 2020 at 5:46:46 AM
Well here's a source from a liberal-leaning news organization for a change.
How it all went so wrong for Gavin Newsom
Newsom had acted quickly to issue a stay-at-home order for his state — he was the first governor in the country to do so — and, despite the Golden State's massive size and population, it appeared to be weathering the Covid-19 crisis relatively well.
His handling of the coronavirus was already leading some people to speculate that it might well be the crown jewel in his resume when he eventually (and inevitably) ran for president.
Eight months later, Newsom's political fortunes have dipped drastically — badly damaged by his decision last month to attend a birthday party for a friend (and lobbyist) at the famed French Laundry restaurant that, at best, skirted the very coronavirus practices he had recommended all Californians follow.
"I made a bad mistake," Newsom told reporters shortly after the incident came to light. "I should have stood up and ... drove back to my house. The spirit of what I'm preaching all the time was contradicted. I need to preach and practice, not just preach."
Newsom hasn't been able to put the episode behind him. And despite the early success in California of mitigating the virus, the state's situation has worsened in recent weeks — forcing Newsom to reinstitute stay-at-home orders for much of the population.
And now comes news that an effort to recall Newsom next year is picking up speed — and supporters. This, from The Associated Press, is worrisome for Newsom: "Recall organizers say they have collected more than half the nearly 1.5 million petition signatures needed to place the recall on the ballot, and they have until mid-March to hit the required threshold."
(Almost two decades ago, California Democratic Gov. Gray Davis was recalled by the state's voters, creating an opening that Arnold Schwarzenegger stepped into.)
Newsom also seems to have horrible luck and keeps stepping on optics landmines.
Los Angeles Times: Newsom-affiliated companies got $2.9 million in relief loans
Edited by FluffyMcChicken on Dec 16th 2020 at 5:56:01 AM
For some reason it is always the Dems who always have a negative backlash from the right for scandals, but when it comes to GOP members, scandals are nothing.
Still I think we need better leadership than Newsom. Younger members with an age similar to AOC's for example would be ideal.
"Wow, no Mega Togekiss in Legends Z-A. Or any non-Froslass new Sinnoh Mega Evolutions. Round of applause, everybody." - DawnCalifornia's hardly lacking for elected Democratic officials. The bench in that state is deep - if one of them wants to challenge Newsom in 2022, they should be free to do so.
Who knows, maybe it'll have died down by then with vaccine distribution/economic recovery and is a nothingburger. Or maybe this provides an opening for a different Democrat to make the case why they could do a better job.
Edited by nova92 on Dec 16th 2020 at 8:00:27 AM
Double post for topic change:
Not sure where else to put this (and if it was posted already I apologize) but here:
The Guardian: Atlantic City to auction off chance to blow up Trump's former casino
The demolition of the former Trump Plaza casino will become a fundraiser to benefit the Boys & Girls Club of Atlantic City that the mayor hopes will raise in excess of $1m.
Opened in 1984, Trump’s former casino was closed in 2014 and has fallen into such a state of disrepair that demolition work began earlier this year. The remainder of the structure will be dynamited on 29 January.
“Some of Atlantic City’s iconic moments happened there, but on his way out, Donald Trump openly mocked Atlantic City, saying he made a lot of money and then got out,” said Marty Small, the mayor. “I wanted to use the demolition of this place to raise money for charity.”
The Boys & Girls Club has hired a professional auction company to solicit bids from Thursday through 19 January, when the top bids will be revealed and a live auction will determine a winner. The organization provides after-school and summer recreation, education and career-training programs for Atlantic City children and teens.
Edited by M84 on Dec 17th 2020 at 12:16:32 AM
Disgusted, but not surprisedHuh, missed this - the Rhode Island Speaker of the House Nicholas Mattiello, a fairly conservative Democrat, lost reelection to a Republican. This is actually a good thing, as Democrats retained the House majority, and Mattiello will be replaced as Speaker by a pretty progressive state Rep., Christopher R. Blazejewski. The Boston Globe
The Providence Journal
Might be sooner than 2022
The drive to Recall him is gaining steam.
![]()
![]()
Second paragraph of that article
FIRST THINGS FIRST: A recall by Republicans, who still have the albatross of Donald Trump, an unpopular president in solidly blue California, around their necks, remains a long shot. And Democrat Newsom still enjoys the strong approval of the majority of Caifornians, the latest Public Policy Institute of California poll showed.
Edited by nova92 on Dec 16th 2020 at 10:53:19 AM
All news is biased to some degree, nova.
Whether or not it's completely fabricated is another matter entirely.
there are still folks from some conservative newsplaces who believe in Journalistic Intregrity. And plenty of left-wing rags that're making up complete BS. Why i just tend to read 'em all and compare notes. If nothing else, the fabricated stuff is good for a laugh, usually due to its sheer ridiculousness.
Course, i might have a soft spot for Tabloid journalism, I did read Weekly World News a lot as a kid XD
Edited by Pendrake on Dec 17th 2020 at 1:25:44 AM
Semper Fi. Semper Paratus. Vigilo Confido.California had a Republican governor as recently as 2011. I really don't think that seat has been unchallenged nearly long enough for complacency to set in. Newsom is just his own problem.
![]()
That must be some kind of karma right there for choosing to work for a "stable genius" (AKA unstable idiot).

"Doesn't openly deny empirical reality and encourage people to spread disease and commits acts of terrorism based on white supremacy" would be a start.
It has to start with a basic acknowledgement of empirical reality and civil rights.