Nov 2023 Mod notice:
There may be other, more specific, threads about some aspects of US politics, but this one tends to act as a hub for all sorts of related news and information, so it's usually one of the busiest OTC threads.
If you're new to OTC, it's worth reading the Introduction to On-Topic Conversations
and the On-Topic Conversations debate guidelines
before posting here.
Rumor-based, fear-mongering and/or inflammatory statements that damage the quality of the thread will be thumped. Off-topic posts will also be thumped. Repeat offenders may be suspended.
If time spent moderating this thread remains a distraction from moderation of the wiki itself, the thread will need to be locked. We want to avoid that, so please follow the forum rules
when posting here.
In line with the general forum rules, 'gravedancing' is prohibited here. If you're celebrating someone's death or hoping that they die, your post will get thumped. This rule applies regardless of what the person you're discussing has said or done.
Edited by Mrph1 on Nov 30th 2023 at 11:03:59 AM
I think New Atheism set actual political atheism back about a decade because their behavior was so unpleasant and only attracted a coterie of neckbeards, especially after Bush left office and their raison d'etre was no longer around. I dunno, I think the emergence of the Religious Left post-2010 has normalized belief in God more strongly in the public sphere than when it was just a right-wing thing to be pious. Wouldn't be surprised if atheists keep hitting a ceiling because of it.
"For all those whose cares have been our concern, the work goes on, the cause endures, the hope still lives, and the dream shall never die."![]()
![]()
![]()
Said people also lead to others leaving the faith. People like that in the church I went to with my parents led to me leaving it. I don't like being called a heathen for pointing out the flaws in your logic when you're trying to use the religion to justify your bigotry.
Edited by ScubaWolf on Dec 13th 2020 at 11:01:56 AM
"In a move surprising absolutely no one"So a lot of outlets are speculating over who is going to be Biden's AG. New names keep popping up but most everyone agrees that Trump has so thoroughly gutted the executive branch of experienced people and working knowledge that Biden's most important staff picks have been determined by A) Do they have the experience to get the department running back on full blast on day one and B) Does Biden personally trust this person.
So I'm betting Fighteer's next paycheck that it'll be Doug Jones.
I'd pray for you to suffer for this, but I'm an atheist, so that's out. Damn.
"It's Occam's Shuriken! If the answer is elusive, never rule out ninjas!"This is the kind of infighting among Democrats that the left cannot afford. Just saying.
"It's Occam's Shuriken! If the answer is elusive, never rule out ninjas!"Kind of what I've meant to get at previously. Some folks on the left don't like to be reminded that they're just as capable of being bigots as rights.
Your belief on the political spectrum doesn't automatically make you faultless, or morally superior.
Semper Fi. Semper Paratus. Vigilo Confido.My fictional money is also on Jones. There seems to be a trend where when multiple names are proposed, Biden chooses the good option/ not the option that infuriates people.
Also, quick aside. I couldn't remember at first where I saw it, but RE globalist, I don't really think of it myself as something except for an antisemitic dog-whistle, but I remembered that a casting announcement
for Shang Chi And The Legend Of The Five Rings describes the villain, the Mandarin as a "globalist" in reference to his public image as some kind of international philanthropist. Not in reference to his actual role as leader of an evil global conspiracy.
So yeah, I guess there really is a neutral-to-positive meaning of "globalist".
Yes, well, "Globalist" was first coined as a neutral/positive term.
But like several dozen other words of the English language, someone hijacked them and placed their own definition. As usual.
Case in point, the just mentioned Tribalism, which, again, Lefts are just as capable of showing as Rights, as it's literally "beliefs and attitudes stemming from strong loyalty to one's own tribe/social group."
Edited by Pendrake on Dec 13th 2020 at 9:19:37 AM
Semper Fi. Semper Paratus. Vigilo Confido.Of course, and most politicians these days are globalists politically speaking, because there really isn't any way around dealing with global politics these days. Most countries can't really afford to go it alone, so they have to adhere to globalism to some extent.
![]()
I think the proper opposite of globalism would be isolationism.
Edited by Redmess on Dec 13th 2020 at 6:17:31 PM
Hope shines brightest in the darkest timesI think the problem is more the fact the US made most of the world dependant on it (and vice versa), which means trying to go Isolationist with "America First" just hurt people.
Not sure what Anti-Semitism has to do with that at all, specially given I'm fairly sure there were tons of Jews in favor of it too.
On a side note, I'm meaning the current policy, not the political movement started in the US back in 1940, and then promptly died in '41 after the Pearl Harbor attack.
Edited by Pendrake on Dec 13th 2020 at 9:29:35 AM
Semper Fi. Semper Paratus. Vigilo Confido.Biden has committed to achieving absolutely nothing if we lose the runoffs.
I'm not shocked considering his record but it's still disgusting. The leftists who were skeptical of his ability to implement meaningful change were entirely right.
Edited by Fourthspartan56 on Dec 13th 2020 at 9:30:02 AM
"Einstein would turn over in his grave. Not only does God play dice, the dice are loaded." -Chairman Sheng-Ji YangWithout the Senate, the Executive's ability to do literally anything at all is very limited. Executive Orders can only stretch so far.
Bernie being POTUS wouldn't change the Executive's dependency on the Legislative in the slightest. Downballot races matter.
Edited by TobiasDrake on Dec 13th 2020 at 9:32:27 AM
My Tumblr. Currently side-by-side liveblogging Digimon Adventure, sub vs dub.Without the Senate, the Executive's ability to do literally anything at all is very limited. Executive Orders can only stretch so far.
Bernie being POTUS wouldn't change the Executive's dependency on the Legislative in the slightest.
This response is very strange to me, if you have a limited amount of tools then arbitrarily and unnecessarily restricting yourself further should be unthinkable.
Yes, you're right that Bernie Sanders would also be in a bad position. But guess what? He wouldn't make it worse. Neither would Warren, or any actual progressive.
"Einstein would turn over in his grave. Not only does God play dice, the dice are loaded." -Chairman Sheng-Ji YangIn fairness, getting the Novel Coronavirus dealt with is likely to be his primary focus for most of his presidency anyways. As pissed off as that makes anyone trying to push a political agenda, it honestly is the right move in my eyes.
Semper Fi. Semper Paratus. Vigilo Confido.Executive orders can be struck down in court. It's trivially easy to issue an injunction against one, since the lower courts are so packed with conservative thugs.
"For all those whose cares have been our concern, the work goes on, the cause endures, the hope still lives, and the dream shall never die."![]()
You say “most of his presidency,” but I see no reason to expect that to take longer than the first year to have everything he needs to do to take care of it done.
Edited by ShinyCottonCandy on Dec 13th 2020 at 12:36:33 PM
My musician page

But not that right...
I'd say Classical liberals tend to be fairly right-wing, in the "let the poor die" sense rather than the more explicitly reactionary or authoritarian sense.
Ugh, New Atheism. What a hot mess of reactionary, petulant bullshit that turned out to be.
Agreed.
Edited by Fourthspartan56 on Dec 13th 2020 at 7:56:34 AM
"Einstein would turn over in his grave. Not only does God play dice, the dice are loaded." -Chairman Sheng-Ji Yang