Nov 2023 Mod notice:
There may be other, more specific, threads about some aspects of US politics, but this one tends to act as a hub for all sorts of related news and information, so it's usually one of the busiest OTC threads.
If you're new to OTC, it's worth reading the Introduction to On-Topic Conversations
and the On-Topic Conversations debate guidelines
before posting here.
Rumor-based, fear-mongering and/or inflammatory statements that damage the quality of the thread will be thumped. Off-topic posts will also be thumped. Repeat offenders may be suspended.
If time spent moderating this thread remains a distraction from moderation of the wiki itself, the thread will need to be locked. We want to avoid that, so please follow the forum rules
when posting here.
In line with the general forum rules, 'gravedancing' is prohibited here. If you're celebrating someone's death or hoping that they die, your post will get thumped. This rule applies regardless of what the person you're discussing has said or done.
Edited by Mrph1 on Nov 30th 2023 at 11:03:59 AM
I heard it on the radio news, but it was in a speech on future corona measures. He was talking about what his administration would do in April, then started hesitatingly talking about how that might be something another administration could do as well.
I'm sure you'll start see other sources mention it soon enough.
Edited by Redmess on Nov 14th 2020 at 3:40:45 PM
Hope shines brightest in the darkest timesHe's said that his administration will not be instituting a lock down. The way he said it, he seemed to implicitly acknowledge that he won't be in a position to inflict a lockdown. He still seems to be clinging to the idea that there might be a chance.
'd
Edited by jjjj2 on Nov 14th 2020 at 9:40:48 AM
You can only write so much in your forum signature. It's not fair that I want to write a piece of writing yet it will cut me off in the midYou know, one thing just struck me. These phony attempts to prove that there's been voter fraud might actually help mollify people who otherwise would have tried using violence to stop the imagined voter fraud.
Extreme right-wing people will be less likely to go to the streets, weapons in hands, if they think it'll be handled by the courts.
Edited by MichaelKatsuro on Nov 14th 2020 at 3:47:07 PM
I think you're absolutely right there, these lawsuits do calm things down. In that regard, they are a good thing for Democrats too, especially since judges are more than willing to show just why there is nothing to them.
I think Democrats could easily make hay out of this and talk about how this demonstrates that the election process is indeed much more secure than the public thinks.
Hope shines brightest in the darkest timesThese people are because they are following Trump's narrative and threatening violence.
Qanon planned on assaulting polling stations and other tactics but their entire facebook profile was deleted on election day and they couldn't coordinate because of it.
Author of The Rules of Supervillainy, Cthulhu Armageddon, and United States of Monsters.While the cases do calm things down in the short term it seems pretty clear now that the conspiracies regarding the election being fraudulent and "deep state" stuff is here to stay regardless.
There might not be any violence now but an uptick in right-wing terrorism still seems pretty likely even now. And I would expect the Republicans will maintain their authoritarian streak and probably solidify it even further.
At the same time, I'm seeing a bunch of people in a server I'm in constantly sharing 'news' of voter fraud happening, without proof, and sometimes even just assuming there's fraud happening when there's no indication of it. Like an email sent by the Delaware county PA about missing data that needs to be correlated before they can give the results (rather than understand it's a normal procedure to make sure the data's correct, they immediately suspect foul play), or the deleted Twitter account of someone who insists they posted proof of Pennsylvania preventing meaningful access to poll watchers.
Boy, comparisons to Dumb and Dumber abound with that one - "What was all that 'one in a million' talk?" The difference being, of course, that Lloyd and Harry were lovable oafs who weren't in positions of power and responsibility.
Edited by ironballs16 on Nov 14th 2020 at 12:03:57 PM
"Why would I inflict myself on somebody else?"![]()
And on January 21, Twitter will ban him and the world will be a much quieter place.
You know how back when the Missouri Compromise was replaced by the Kansas Nebraska Act and let a new state decide whether it wanted to be free or slavers based on popular vote? And how that led to large amounts of pro and antislavery supporters coming to settle Kansas to sway the vote one way or the other?
I wonder how feasible it would be to organize a modern version of that to encourage Democrats from safe states to move to the sun/rust belt.
Edited by Parable on Nov 14th 2020 at 10:36:47 AM
I'm starting to think the only reason Trump decided to hold a rally at Four Seasons Total Landscaping is because he wanted a distraction as he was making funeral arrangements for himself and his wife across the street. (That, or he wanted one last masturbation before the law comes down hard on him in New York after January 20.) Is it time for Team Trump to stage an intervention at this point?
I've stated many times the issue is not that the voters aren't there but that they are disenfranchised and convinced their vote doesn't matter. Stacey Abrams is thankfully the first time I can say, "No, you're wrong about the South. It's that we're under a tyranny."
Author of The Rules of Supervillainy, Cthulhu Armageddon, and United States of Monsters.That's more to do with jobs and economic opportunity than politics as far as I'm aware, though it does help that these recent arrivals lean Democratic. It isn't happening fast enough to get us North Carolina or Texas though.
I'm talking about deliberate organization to get people to move to another state.
Also, it is aiming at the wrong states. You need to go to Montana, Alaska, Wyoming and these smaller states which are useless for presidential elections but are worth several Senate seats.
"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard FeynmanWhile you’re right compared to Texas it doesn’t hold for Georgia or North Carolina, the margin in North Carolina was 70,000 votes in Trump’s favour and in Georgia it was 14,000 in Biden favour (10,000 in Arizona), comparatively in Montana/North Dakota/South Dakota/Wyoming it was 100,000 in Trump’s favour. So even with the states being bigger the impact that several thousand people relocating would have is still bigger. Alaska might be the exception, as the margin there was 36,000.
“And the Bunny nails it!” ~ Gabrael “If the UN can get through a day without everyone strangling everyone else so can we.” ~ Cyran

Apparently Trump is now kinda sorta acknowledging that he may not have a second term.
His loss seems to finally be sinking in a little. Give it another week or two and he may actually start railing against Biden's presidency.
Hope shines brightest in the darkest times