Nov 2023 Mod notice:
There may be other, more specific, threads about some aspects of US politics, but this one tends to act as a hub for all sorts of related news and information, so it's usually one of the busiest OTC threads.
If you're new to OTC, it's worth reading the Introduction to On-Topic Conversations
and the On-Topic Conversations debate guidelines
before posting here.
Rumor-based, fear-mongering and/or inflammatory statements that damage the quality of the thread will be thumped. Off-topic posts will also be thumped. Repeat offenders may be suspended.
If time spent moderating this thread remains a distraction from moderation of the wiki itself, the thread will need to be locked. We want to avoid that, so please follow the forum rules
when posting here.
In line with the general forum rules, 'gravedancing' is prohibited here. If you're celebrating someone's death or hoping that they die, your post will get thumped. This rule applies regardless of what the person you're discussing has said or done.
Edited by Mrph1 on Nov 30th 2023 at 11:03:59 AM
Trump really seems to have a hard-on for trying to start something with Iran. I mean I know that he is an Islamophobic asshole, but what is it with him being so hellbent to threaten to attack Iran in particular?
Is it part of his "Shit on everything my predecessor had a hand in on principle" shtick, because of the deal Obama made?
Certified: 48.0% West Asian, 6.5% South Asian, 15.8% North/West European, 15.7% English, 7.4% Balkan, 6.6% Scandinavian![]()
I don't think so, he wouldn't see any benefit in doing something like that.
He's had a number of Iran hawks in his administration, and in-general the Foreign Policy Establishment has a psychotic fixation on Iran.
Edited by Fourthspartan56 on Oct 9th 2020 at 5:25:01 AM
"Einstein would turn over in his grave. Not only does God play dice, the dice are loaded." -Chairman Sheng-Ji Yang
x4 Iran's been the boogeyman for Conservative Americans since the 1979 Hostage Crises; they harmed Americans and haven't been made to pay for it 'yet' in the eyes of Conservative Americans. 9/11 also helped intensify the boogeyman status of Iran, especially because they were a part of Bush Jr's "Axis of Evil".
Always funny how these conservatives fail to mention the fact why the hostage crisis happened in the first place. It's not like America overthrew their democratically elected leader and installed the Shah, later causing the Islamic Revolution.
Create Your Own Villain at it's best. These people really don't know their arse from their elbow.
Certified: 48.0% West Asian, 6.5% South Asian, 15.8% North/West European, 15.7% English, 7.4% Balkan, 6.6% ScandinavianThe conversation moved on but I wrote this post damn it.
Pelosi hinted at a possible path for a vaccine to get political traction - and as I mentioned I bristled at her words because I am British. By political traction I mean a way for it to become a partisan issue.
Basically, it's universally accepted that out of the plausible vaccines the one being developed by Oxford University is furthest along the clinical trial pathway. So lets say it completes the trial successfully and therefore gets approved by the MHRA - the UK equivalent of the FDA.
Trump then uses the fact that a Western ally has an approved treatment as a way to bypass the FDA, who at a minimum should take two to three weeks to assess ANY "foreign" approval of a vaccine. He'll bluster on about the fact that the UK has said it's okay so why does the FDA have to go through this lengthy process, it's clear that it's a political attack against me deep state deep state.
So to try and fortify the FDA against that threat, Pelosi needed to make clear that if it was approved in the UK it would not automatically mean that it will be approved in the US. And the best way to do that was to suggest that the UK regulatory body applies a lower standard / treatments are not as safe etc.
At least, that's how I interpreted Pelosi attacking / casting doubt on the UK medical testing regime. I did ask the question if there were substantial differences between the US and the UK in how medical treatments were authorised but that got lost in the thread.
![]()
Since this came up, I've been questioning for a while ...
The hell is the "Deep State"? Is that, like, the Illuminati stuff? The Q Anon weirdoes seem to believe it, so I'm assuming it's just a conspiracy.
Edited by Aukefi on Oct 9th 2020 at 5:42:46 AM
The hell is the "Deep State"? Is that, like, the Illuminati stuff?
Idiotic reactionaries like Trump use it as a conspiracy theory for a nebulous group of civil servants who are responsible for all his failures.
The actual term refers to powerful interests within states who act independently of democratic authority, an example would be the military in Turkey who before they were purged by Erdogan wielded considerable power and would coup leaders they saw as anti-democratic. The US doesn't really have any kind of deep state.
Edited by Fourthspartan56 on Oct 9th 2020 at 5:47:34 AM
"Einstein would turn over in his grave. Not only does God play dice, the dice are loaded." -Chairman Sheng-Ji YangTrump has wanted desperately to make Covid-19 go away for the entire time it's been existence. It's really impressive how he's done his absolute best to deny every layer of it and be upset when this doesn't make it magically disappear but magnifies the problem. Mind you, his son in law believing it would mass murder black people and liberals didn't help but that's our Presidency in a nutshell. Trump has offered to buy the vaccine numerous times and I have no doubt would LOVE a miracle cure. Because, again, the virus is the ultimate example of his utter incompetence as a President.
The Deep State is an American Bund (American Nazi—the OG kind) concept that was created by Fritz Kuhn that basically indicated that the government was controlled by The Illuminati but in this case, specifically meant Jews. The idea that democracy is a sham and thus you should put your faith in a fascist leader instead to save you. That anyone who is against the leader is a puppet of the Jews/Not Jews/Elite and can't be trusted. They're also up to something nefarious.
Qanon is another manifestation of this.
It does have an anti-democratic The Quisling organization of corporate-fascists infiltrating the government to destroy it and work against the American people. They're just called the GOP. Because we live in opposite world.
Edited by CharlesPhipps on Oct 9th 2020 at 5:48:09 AM
Author of The Rules of Supervillainy, Cthulhu Armageddon, and United States of Monsters.It does have an anti-democratic The Quisling organization of corporate-fascists infiltrating the government to destroy it and work against the American people. They're just called the GOP. Because we live in opposite world.
Heh, quite. Though they're less "deep" and more "proudly in the open"
Edited by Fourthspartan56 on Oct 9th 2020 at 5:49:24 AM
"Einstein would turn over in his grave. Not only does God play dice, the dice are loaded." -Chairman Sheng-Ji YangNow this is something I genuinely don't get. Pompeo is going to release Hillary Clinton's emails
.
But why? This isn't 2016 anymore. She's not running for President. She doesn't pose any threat to Trump or the Republican Party. What good would something like this be in 2020?
If this is a ploy to turn the election in their favor, why not dig up some dirt on Biden and go after him? It's not like there's any shortage of that: Hunter's trip to Ukraine, Tara Reade, you name it. But other than the events that led up to Trump's impeachment in 2019, the Republicans have been strangely passive regarding this sort of thing.
I can't believe they drank their own Koolaid. They're not all Straw Hypocrites, they're really that infernally stupid. Which is actually good for us, as they're not enough of The Chessmaster to hold onto power as a more clever kind of villain would.
Edited by AlleyOop on Oct 9th 2020 at 9:13:25 AM
The generous answer is that it's all a part of the deep state coup narrative that Trump is trying to ferment.
Hillary's emails are basically the clearest evidence that the deep state exists - essentially the fact that all these investigations cleared her of criminal wrong doing just proves that all the institutions of government are geared against Trump. That there never was a transition of power - the deep state always persisted.
Ergo, if there never was a transition of power, then Trump doesn't have to support a transition of power.
The less generous answer and far more likely - Hilary's Emails are Trump's comfort blanket, his safe space. And when Trump says jump, Pompeo asks "how high?"
Well, that's what you get. You start pandering to certain less-than-reasonable groups for some easy votes, but then a generation grows up with this new message. So your next batch of politicians will include true believers, dragging you ever deeper into the hole of madness that you dug for yourself.
Republicans courted evangelicals and white supremacists with dogwhistles and concern trolling, and now that is literally all the party is.
Edited by Kayeka on Oct 9th 2020 at 3:20:18 PM

Sudden thought: If the Oxford vaccine (or any other reputable vaccine) were announced as viable before the election but slated to be distributed after, would Trump threaten to sign an executive order banning the vaccine during his lame duck period if he's not re-elected?