Nov 2023 Mod notice:
There may be other, more specific, threads about some aspects of US politics, but this one tends to act as a hub for all sorts of related news and information, so it's usually one of the busiest OTC threads.
If you're new to OTC, it's worth reading the Introduction to On-Topic Conversations
and the On-Topic Conversations debate guidelines
before posting here.
Rumor-based, fear-mongering and/or inflammatory statements that damage the quality of the thread will be thumped. Off-topic posts will also be thumped. Repeat offenders may be suspended.
If time spent moderating this thread remains a distraction from moderation of the wiki itself, the thread will need to be locked. We want to avoid that, so please follow the forum rules
when posting here.
In line with the general forum rules, 'gravedancing' is prohibited here. If you're celebrating someone's death or hoping that they die, your post will get thumped. This rule applies regardless of what the person you're discussing has said or done.
Edited by Mrph1 on Nov 30th 2023 at 11:03:59 AM
^^^So true, but like always, I'll vote democrat becuae A) I want my vote to actually count B) they may not be al left as me but they are left and that the point and C) neo-cons and teabaggers are fucking insane because they think that deregulation helps anyone beside Wall Street and the banks D) right wing candidates don't support human rights (LGBT/minority/woman's/whatever) and think "the gubberment is tryin to take mah gunz".
@thorn: they are nasty, it's dirty and you better have a crystal clear fucking slate because pac's will dig up everything you did wrong in your life to discredit you. "Can't they play nice" FUCK NO THEY CAN'T! You point would everything the other guy did wrong and make him look like a fool while shouting what you'd do while the other it does the same fucking thing. Sit back, relax, and enjoy the fucking ride man. And get ready for it again in 2 more years.
edited 16th Oct '12 9:20:33 PM by vanthebaron
Untitled Power Rangers StorySee, China missed the boat. If they'd become a democracy way back in the 1800s, candidates could have had real life kung fu duels over policy. How the hell could we have topped that?
Share it so that people can get into this conversation, 'cause we're not the only ones who think like this.![]()
That's it. The minute we invent the time machine, that is exactly what we will be making happen first. Defying Hitler's Time Travel Exemption Act comes second now.
edited 16th Oct '12 9:21:19 PM by TrashJack
"Cynic, n. — A blackguard whose faulty vision sees things as they are, not as they ought to be." - The Devil's DictionaryI think people's perception of Obama being an "average" president is starting to take a toll on him. That's why all the campaign is centered around on saying that it's lacking real change and progress. I'm really wondering how the Obama campaign would refute that. It would take more of a strong affirmative defense of the current administration than what I see now.
![]()
![]()
Taiwan did it in their stead.
Eh tariffs, they make everything all weird. I suppose it really depends on what said thing is.
Obama does have the problem with a mountain of brokenish promises, but he seems to either dodge it or just say congress wasn't cooperating.
edited 16th Oct '12 9:28:57 PM by Aqueos
Bet you didn't see that coming@Thorn: Agree'd... well, kind of. The issue for me isn't that it's so regrettable that politicians attack each other, though. It's that the only time they actually care about things is when they're attacking each other.
Obama the candidate was a champion of civil liberties, not someone who approved of extrajudicial killings. He was someone who wanted to protect the social safety net. Now, Social Security would most certainly have gotten a cut if it weren't for the fact that Obama demanded a cut and revenue increases. In an ironic twist of fate, it was the uncompromising stubbornness of Republicans, not the convictions of Obama, that has left the program protected.
In any situation, it's easy to just say "Republicans made him do this" or "it would've made him unpopular if he did that." But at that point, I don't feel like I'm even dealing with real political parties anymore. It seems more like Democrats are the Good Cop in some Good Cop/Bad Cop routine where they get away with ignoring the concerns of progressives because the other side is a bunch of clowns.
edited 16th Oct '12 9:32:39 PM by HilarityEnsues
Obstructionism is preventing anything from getting done through fillabustering or bullshit speeches/debates. That's what the republicans were doing for 2 years. All take and not give.
Untitled Power Rangers Story![]()
![]()
Well no they didn't roll over and say WHATEVER YOU WANT PRESIDENT, but he had a democratic majority in both houses for a while (half his term).
If that isn't good conditions, I don't know what is. Still though, even now he's just not really... well doing much. All his budgets insofar from what I remember haven't even been workable.
Sure republicans have been blockading things, but then again he's not exactly giving them any concessions.
edited 16th Oct '12 9:39:00 PM by Aqueos
Bet you didn't see that coming![]()
Between the contested results of the Minnesota Senate race and another Senator dying, the Democrats only had a filibuster proof supermajority for a very short period of time, and even then, they only got all 60 of those seats because several Democratic Senators promised to support certain right-wing policies. With how unified Republican legislators were following the 2008 elections, that still counts as a serious barrier towards Democrats enacting policies. Heck, we probably wouldn't have gotten the Affordable Care Act at all if it weren't for that brief supermajority window.
edited 16th Oct '12 9:43:45 PM by RavenWilder
Well yes, but what I'm saying is that part of the reason there's a blockade is no one really seems to want compromise. Sure we all say "Oh if only they would get things done" but the moment a concession is made it's the apocalypse. Effectively bribing a few people off to force through legislation hardly goes in the non-partisan box.
edited 16th Oct '12 9:45:51 PM by Aqueos
Bet you didn't see that comingHuh, I missed the debate.
I don't like either choice. And as stated elsewhere, voting for a third-party might ease your conscious, but precious little else. We have two political parties, one of which is more or less disastrous, and the other is just plain unpalatable (disclaimer: your opinion on which is which may vary). So Ron Paul kind of has a point - both parties are similar, differing only on details. Overall, both are imperfect, and they're often so busy infighting with the other party or even with each other that progress overall is slow to occur.
The Pendulum swings one way and then the other, both parties get their chance Doing Stuff They Like, and we're mostly along for the ride - or, that's how it seems to me. I'm not a Political expert of any kind, and aside from being a older-that-average married Christian father, I'm not terribly different than most Tropers here.
Would having more parties really matter? I mean, would it actually help? Well, we could likely run into the scenario in which the President is elected with only something like 34% of the votes, with the runner-up taking only 32% or something. That leaves you with the majority of the population feeling that they got stood up. Perception is the rule, they say.
So.... I don't know. I sit back and wonder if we would be better off with a 3-party system (or more, even), but it's kind of like debating "what if...?" on pretty much any other Game-Changer of Life.
Happiness is zero-gee with a sinus cold.![]()
Well he should have known he wasn't actually capable of such miracles. But in the case of something black and white, take the closing of the space shuttle program. Now I did agree with this, but he did promise voters in Florida he would protect this.
But regardless of how unreasonable and numerous the promises were, and how well the other option may have done, they are still broken.
edited 16th Oct '12 9:47:28 PM by Aqueos
Bet you didn't see that comingOh please, what president hasn't offered the moon and say he'd fix everything?
Also he has more promises filled than broken at Politifact
http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/promises/obameter/
edited 16th Oct '12 9:49:21 PM by Thorn14
My dad just articulated quoted* a theory he heard from a coworker or something, he can't remember. But he thinks it might be the Republican plan.
Republicans dive to the right —> Democrats forced to compromise —> Republicans dive further to the right —> Democratic concessions forced to become more conservative —> Repeat until America is blood-red.
I'm not sure what to say about that.
edited 16th Oct '12 9:50:57 PM by SnowyFoxes
The last battle's curtains will open on stage!

Politics is not the art of the possible. It consists in choosing between the disastrous and the unpalatable.
- John Kenneth Galbraith
edited 16th Oct '12 9:09:26 PM by DeviantBraeburn
Everything is Possible. But some things are more Probable than others. JEBAGEDDON 2016