Nov 2023 Mod notice:
There may be other, more specific, threads about some aspects of US politics, but this one tends to act as a hub for all sorts of related news and information, so it's usually one of the busiest OTC threads.
If you're new to OTC, it's worth reading the Introduction to On-Topic Conversations
and the On-Topic Conversations debate guidelines
before posting here.
Rumor-based, fear-mongering and/or inflammatory statements that damage the quality of the thread will be thumped. Off-topic posts will also be thumped. Repeat offenders may be suspended.
If time spent moderating this thread remains a distraction from moderation of the wiki itself, the thread will need to be locked. We want to avoid that, so please follow the forum rules
when posting here.
In line with the general forum rules, 'gravedancing' is prohibited here. If you're celebrating someone's death or hoping that they die, your post will get thumped. This rule applies regardless of what the person you're discussing has said or done.
Edited by Mrph1 on Nov 30th 2023 at 11:03:59 AM
Print media of a given quality will be superior to video media of a given quality, because the level of in-depth and highly detailed explanation you can go into with an article—especially a web article—is much greater than can be squeezed into some sort of television spot. The exception is investigative documentaries where you can devote an hour long slot or more to a single task.
Also, there's the gradual deskilling of print media to take into account, as publishers struggle in vain to find a viable profit model while cutting everything they can find an excuse to cut (and venture capitalists merrily help the sector along in its decline). A depressingly large number of news articles these days are Associated Press tweets padded out by a clueless, disinterested intern, even from papers with once-exalted reputations.
What's precedent ever done for us?According to the Trump campaign, he's only done two hours of debate prep.
https://www.cnn.com/2020/09/28/politics/trump-debate-prep/index.html
I find newspapers to be more trustworthy. Which is weird because I am Gen Z to the core.
To be to the point, the reason so many, especialy Amercians see television news as inferior, is well.... the way it gets its proffit requires it to be sensationalist over factual, since more veiws = advertisers paying more money.
When you get situations where the news is paid for by methods other then advertising it normally gets better, though while Tax money is a very good way to do this it also runs risk of creating its own kind of bias.
I do not understand how the BBC manages to remain top quality news, while the NHK does..... not.
The Tories are fixing that, for example the former editor of the Daily Telegraph is about to head the BBC, while the former editor of the Daily Mail is about to be in charge of our communication regulatory body.
That’s before we get to the fact that the BBC is reportedly already considering cancelling comedy for being to left-wing.
“And the Bunny nails it!” ~ Gabrael “If the UN can get through a day without everyone strangling everyone else so can we.” ~ CyranAlbeit the "comedy is too left wing" bit was run mostly by right wing papers and the current head of the BBC denied it. Of course he's going to be replaced by a conservative so it could well end up happening just the same.
"These 'no-nonsense' solutions of yours just don't hold water in a complex world of jet-powered apes and time travel."I'm way late to the party, but I'd note that even though I haven't fully formed an opinion on age voting restrictions, I would say I am up for anyone who turns 18 during a year to be able to vote in all elections during that year.
My niece and step-nephew turned 18 this year before the general, but after the primaries. This also got me into thinking about people who can't start voting until the next year since their birthdays came too late in the year.
Edited by tclittle on Sep 29th 2020 at 4:16:27 AM
"We're all paper, we're all scissors, we're all fightin' with our mirrors, scared we'll never find somebody to love."AP News:
Commerce Secretary [Wilbur] Ross says 2020 census will end Oct. 5 despite court order
U.S. Secretary of Commerce Wilbur Ross says the 2020 census will end Oct. 5, despite a federal judge's ruling last week allowing the head count of every U.S. resident to continue through the end of October, according to a tweet posted by the Census Bureau on Monday.
The tweet said the ability for people to self-respond to the census questionnaire and the door-knocking phase when census takers go to homes that haven’t yet responded are targeted to end Oct. 5.
The announcement came as a virtual hearing was being held in San Jose, California, as a follow-up to U.S. District Judge Lucy Koh's preliminary injunction. The injunction issued last week suspended the Census Bureau’s deadline for ending the head count on Sept. 30, which automatically reverted back to an older Census Bureau plan in which the timeline for ending field operations was Oct. 31.
Edited by nova92 on Sep 29th 2020 at 3:05:43 AM
If you are going to allow people under 18 to vote, you either need to lower the voting age, or not do it at all. You can't pick and choose who gets to vote, especially not based on intellect or political interest.
Also, the NOS does long form documentaries on subjects too, as well as longer interviews. I'm watching an extensive briefing on Corona on our 24 hour news channel right now, for example. And of course there are serious talk shows that go more in depth as well.
Edited by Redmess on Sep 29th 2020 at 1:41:48 PM
Hope shines brightest in the darkest timesAny 'test' used to determine who does and does not get to vote will be abused by racist assholes to try and stop Po C from voting at ALL full stop. Its been done before and will be done again.
Age is not biased, you are either of age or not of age. Harder to fudge harder to say "No you can't vote because of X" Not impossible but much harder to pull off.
Use this thread
for age of whatever discussions, please.
Oh, I'm not even talking about that sort of abuse. If we start selecting voters based on their political engagement, that would be bad in and of itself. There is a reason we call voting rights universal. We really don't want to go back to when only the political elite was allowed to vote.
Hope shines brightest in the darkest timesOnce again, a judge tells the president "No, you cannot do that."
Edited by Redmess on Sep 29th 2020 at 3:50:40 PM
Hope shines brightest in the darkest times

I'm not sure I agree that television news is inherently inferior to print. There are plenty of decent television news sources around, I'm sure. Our national public television news program (NOS) is very reputable and factual, for instance.
I think this attitude stems from cable news, which generally seems more sensationalist than news programs I'm familiar with.
Hope shines brightest in the darkest times