Nov 2023 Mod notice:
There may be other, more specific, threads about some aspects of US politics, but this one tends to act as a hub for all sorts of related news and information, so it's usually one of the busiest OTC threads.
If you're new to OTC, it's worth reading the Introduction to On-Topic Conversations
and the On-Topic Conversations debate guidelines
before posting here.
Rumor-based, fear-mongering and/or inflammatory statements that damage the quality of the thread will be thumped. Off-topic posts will also be thumped. Repeat offenders may be suspended.
If time spent moderating this thread remains a distraction from moderation of the wiki itself, the thread will need to be locked. We want to avoid that, so please follow the forum rules
when posting here.
In line with the general forum rules, 'gravedancing' is prohibited here. If you're celebrating someone's death or hoping that they die, your post will get thumped. This rule applies regardless of what the person you're discussing has said or done.
Edited by Mrph1 on Nov 30th 2023 at 11:03:59 AM
I'd argue they've been doing that for a whole lot longer. Trump isn't an anomaly that hijacked their system, he is a deliberate hateful product of them.
Wasn't it Barry Goldwater who warned this would happen after the republicans allied themselves to the evangelicals?
It has always been the prerogative of children and half-wits to point out that the emperor has no clothesYeah the sad reality is that if you’re a democrat in Oklahoma or a Republican in California the most effective thing you can do to help your party at the presidential election isn’t vote, it’s to have not been counted in the most recent census.
We can see this is history, if slaves had been counted as whole people instead of 3/5th of a person, then slavery might have lasted longer, as slave states would have had more electoral college votes with which to get pro-slavery presidential candidates election.
Edited by Silasw on Sep 28th 2020 at 9:07:37 AM
“And the Bunny nails it!” ~ Gabrael “If the UN can get through a day without everyone strangling everyone else so can we.” ~ CyranGoldwater was still a far-right wacko but when compared to the modern GOP he actually comes off as quite a bit more reasonable in a few areas. He despised the religious right, was pro-choice and I recall he supported gay people to an extent but I'm not familiar with the specifics.
Edited by Draghinazzo on Sep 28th 2020 at 6:12:31 AM
Edited by Balmung on Sep 28th 2020 at 4:14:09 AM
Reagan became the gold standard though.
The fact he was all fluff and no substance while being the puppet of profit and venture in the background is what the republicans began to build from then on because it landed them votes.
He was far more influential than that. And incompetent, too.
It has always been the prerogative of children and half-wits to point out that the emperor has no clothesGoldwater helped pave for the way of corrupting the Christian Church in America. He is nothing but an enormous pile of racist shit who helped start the culture wars. Ironic, he was wrong about what he predicted because the sewage flowed from the Right into the faithful.
And I know they had flaws but the GOP made the modern political-corruption monster machine.
Author of The Rules of Supervillainy, Cthulhu Armageddon, and United States of Monsters.Again, I don't think Schlafly's role can be overstated. She was the absolute queen of all culture warriors. And the big inciting incident was the IRS taking away Bob Jones University's tax exempt status due to its policy of segregation. She set about uniting the evangelicals into a powerful unified conservative coalition to try to undo this and did so by making everything remotely controversial a wedge issue to push these people to reliably turn out to vote for the conservative, no matter who, and to see anyone progressive not just as someone with a differing opinion, but as an enemy of both themselves and of God Himself.
I mean. The issue I see is that I would not, right now, descirbe the Republican party as having a principle or an ideology whatsoever, so espousing that Goldwater's ideals prevailed is a bit odd to me.
The Republican party runs on the principle of "I want to win to stay in power" and the cost of "literally everything but me". It's why even the more "principled" ones like Mitt Romney can do a 180 on stuff like the Supreme Court choice.
Anything they say doesn't matter. It bears no relevance. They will mold anything they want to say according to the needs of whoever gives them money. They would pretend Lincoln was secretly a racist if the Koch brothers paid them to do it.
If there was anything remotely similar to a conscience in them it died long ago though it sputtered its death throes on occasion from maybe, like, what. Mc Cain?
It has always been the prerogative of children and half-wits to point out that the emperor has no clothesI would say they do have ideals, they are just pretty terrible ones like plutocracy and xenophobia. In addition to them being bad they are also so convinced they are right that they think anything is justifiable to remain in power, even if it is antidemocratic and disenfranchising to the vast majority of people.
Edited by Draghinazzo on Sep 28th 2020 at 6:45:02 AM
The GOP absolutely does have principles. They're just abhorrent.
The GOP wants to dismantle all environmental regulations, workers protections, and healthcare regulations, and they want to viciously enforce cis straight white male supremacy though harsh border enforcement, heavy-handed policing, reversing Obergefell v Hodges, Brown v Board of Education, Roe v Wade, repealing the Voting Rights Act, every Civil Rights Act, Affirmative Action, and more. Basically, they want to roll back to around 1880, when rich businessmen were virtually unchecked and they could freely oppress minorities however they wished.
Yeah, if they had no principles and just wanted power you'd see much more significant diversity of proposed policy. But no, Republicans are lockstep in the issues they support and the policies they want.
To the surprise of nobody, the Trump campaign has been listing voters that it doesn't want to vote and seeking to deter them.
Well, it did in 2016; it's probably doing so this time around too.
Edited by RainehDaze on Sep 28th 2020 at 11:01:21 AM
Also, here's an in-depth look at the debts Trump owes.
Remember, it's only 421mil coming due soon. He actually has over a billion dollars in debt. Further on it goes into calculating Trump's total net worth etc.
Cash Trump has available: probably ~$160 mil. Adverse tax rulings could cost ~$100 mil of that. Net worth is probably 2 and a bit billion? Before the debt. So... about half his worth is outweighed by his existing debts, and all of it is buried in heavily mortgaged properties that nobody will want to buy at their stated value.
Edited by RainehDaze on Sep 28th 2020 at 11:34:09 AM
What's amazing is that Russia, Saudi Arabia, and other people donated hundreds of millions of dollars to get Trump out of debt.
Trump blew through all of that.
He robbed his own campaign of something like 600 million dollars to get rid of his debt....already gone.
Edited by CharlesPhipps on Sep 28th 2020 at 3:39:52 AM
Author of The Rules of Supervillainy, Cthulhu Armageddon, and United States of Monsters.He is without a doubt the worst businessman ever. He got plenty of starting cash from his father, and invested into real estate and casinos. Two things that should not fail. Somehow, this collapsed and he wound up massively in debt. Got a lucrative television deal... blew through all that investing in the same easily-profitable industries. And he's massively in debt again.
How do you get a billion dollars in debt owning property?
So did anyone else hear about this?
REVEALED: Trump’s election campaign wanted to deter millions of Black Americans from voting in 2016.
The ‘Deterrence’ project can be revealed after Channel 4 News obtained the database used by Trump's digital campaign team.
Millions of Americans in key battleground states were separated into eight categories, so they could be targeted with tailored ads online.
One of the categories was named ‘Deterrence’, which was later described publicly by Trump’s chief data scientist as containing people the campaign “hope don’t show up to vote”.
Analysis by Channel 4 News shows Black Americans - historically a community targeted with voter suppression tactics - were disproportionately marked ‘Deterrence’ by the 2016 campaign.
In total, 3.5 million Black Americans were marked ‘Deterrence’.
Overall, people of colour labelled as Black, Hispanic, Asian and ‘Other’ groups made up 54% of the ‘Deterrence’ category.
Meanwhile, categories of voters the campaign wished to attract were overwhelmingly white.
The investigation reveals the Trump campaign targeted Black Americans with negative ads on Facebook and social media - despite the campaign's denials.
Edited by megaeliz on Sep 28th 2020 at 6:48:27 AM

And as for formulating your political positions, I've got a few suggestions you might find handy.
1) Don't listen to just outlets that you already agree with. When I was in my early 20s, I actually listened to Rush Limbaugh while driving, and every now and then, I'd actually agree with a position of his... but he'd nigh-inevitably say something that made me vehemently disagree with him, even if he didn't intend that reaction.
2) For the most part, go with print sources if you want actual news. Televised news is very much about If It Bleeds, It Leads, while print sources will enable you to get into the nitty-gritty of the particular situation.
3) Use primary sources. If an article you're reading cites a different one, read that article too - sometimes a citation lacks critical context, sometimes accidentally, and sometimes very purposefully.
4) Read Starship Troopers - it's genuinely helpful in figuring out where you might fall on the political spectrum, since it's not necessarily that you disagree with a stated stance within the book (not the movie - that is a very important distinction), but why you disagree with it.
"Why would I inflict myself on somebody else?"