Nov 2023 Mod notice:
There may be other, more specific, threads about some aspects of US politics, but this one tends to act as a hub for all sorts of related news and information, so it's usually one of the busiest OTC threads.
If you're new to OTC, it's worth reading the Introduction to On-Topic Conversations
and the On-Topic Conversations debate guidelines
before posting here.
Rumor-based, fear-mongering and/or inflammatory statements that damage the quality of the thread will be thumped. Off-topic posts will also be thumped. Repeat offenders may be suspended.
If time spent moderating this thread remains a distraction from moderation of the wiki itself, the thread will need to be locked. We want to avoid that, so please follow the forum rules
when posting here.
In line with the general forum rules, 'gravedancing' is prohibited here. If you're celebrating someone's death or hoping that they die, your post will get thumped. This rule applies regardless of what the person you're discussing has said or done.
Edited by Mrph1 on Nov 30th 2023 at 11:03:59 AM
![]()
You can’t “purge political bias”. Surely you can hear how bad that sounds. Government employees are legally permitted whatever bias they’d like, so long as they do their jobs. There are already systems in place to punish them when they don’t.
Purges based on political alignment are doomed from the very start. Purges in general are an almost complete waste of your time. And I think we both know what the implication as to who this “purge” should target is.
And those suggestions for the presidency are just silly. High crimes and misdemeanors is already defined, and the issue isn’t the president having unilateral control of the Executive branch. Those suggestions seem based on a misunderstanding of divisions of power and the role of the Executive.
Edited by archonspeaks on Oct 5th 2019 at 10:35:00 AM
They should have sent a poet.There are some quirks that could benefit from being ironed out, the fact that the president can veto the congressional veto of an emergency declaration is just silly.
Those systems aren’t up to scratch, Comey is living proof of that.
Edited by Silasw on Oct 5th 2019 at 5:36:05 PM
“And the Bunny nails it!” ~ Gabrael “If the UN can get through a day without everyone strangling everyone else so can we.” ~ CyranUm... maybe google "functions of government" before deciding what is and isn't pertinent to monarchs vs presidents, yes?
Take the UK — we functionally have two leaders: the monarch and the Prime Minister. Between them, they split the exact same powers your government splits between the president, the supreme court and congress (even down to how we compartmentalize departments of government, often enough — different labels; same jobs).
Our head of state is the queen. The head of government is functionally the PM, who runs it (and the treasury) on behalf of the queen, but is not selected by the queen (it used to be a different story).
And, no: not a figurehead. She appoints ambassadors, judges and technically everybody who ranks up enough in the forces into appointable positions.
What she doesn't do is run government, set governmental agendas, dictate policy or appoint parliamentary or treasury positions (minus the House of Lords — that's a bit different).
Edited by Euodiachloris on Oct 5th 2019 at 6:51:24 PM
![]()
![]()
I mean, I’d argue that the situation with Comey was highly unusual and its outcome doesn’t really mean there’s an issue with “the system”, but I can see why people would want him punished.
I’d also point out that if there is an issue with that system, it doesn’t have anything to do with the Constitution, or require anything as absurd as a purge.
Edited by archonspeaks on Oct 5th 2019 at 10:45:12 AM
They should have sent a poet.
X4 Recent gerrymandering stuff has meant that we do genuinely need a constitutional amendment to mandate free and fair elections (the Supreme Court has ruled construction does not require that election be free and fair), now that’s not a direct result of Trump, but it ties into him and how he’s been trying to rig 2020.
Likewise making financial disclosure mandatory might well require an amendment.
“And the Bunny nails it!” ~ Gabrael “If the UN can get through a day without everyone strangling everyone else so can we.” ~ Cyran
Actually, the Court ruled that Congress does have the power to determine election laws, including laws on Gerrymandering; same with State Governments. So while the Constitution doesn't give the Supreme Court the right to rule on matters of Elections, it does give Congress and the States the power to make sure Elections are free and fair (as well as not free and unfair).
Let's make one thing clear, the Supreme Court decided that the Supreme Court does not have the power to make sure that elections are free and fair. That is not the same thing as the Constitution deciding it.
But yes, you're correct that state governments and the legislature can fight it. Theoretically at least.
"Einstein would turn over in his grave. Not only does God play dice, the dice are loaded." -Chairman Sheng-Ji YangHow come conspiracy theories are saying that George Bush Sr was involved with LBJ in the Kennedy assassination. I get LBJ, but adding Bush because he later got into the CIA(but not for some time) and was Texan, but that all seems a stretch to demonize the Bushes. It's "Ted Cruz's dad was involved in the Kennedy assassination" levels of dumb, but not "Ted Cruz is the Zodiac Killer" levels of dumb(for start, the Zodiac Killer was active before Cruz was born)
Probably not Dubya Senior or Junior (because both are terrible shots), but I'm willing to bet good money it was the Mafia.
Then again, that's just me.
Edited by TechPriest90 on Oct 5th 2019 at 2:44:48 PM
I hold the secrets of the machine.Pretty much every JFK conspiracy theory is stupid as hell. They are partly rooted in people not really wanting to believe it was simply a matter of a lone bitter angry man with a gun. They need to believe that the death of someone as important as a POTUS has to have more meaning behind it.
Edited by M84 on Oct 6th 2019 at 2:57:16 AM
Disgusted, but not surprisedNo, no, we all know that JFK was assassinated by Moon Nazis.
The real purpose of the Apollo landings were to destroy the Nazi moon bases, with faked footage to make it look like a flag-and-footsteps mission. The program ended early when the Astronauts destroyed every last Nazi Moon base quicker than expected, especially when Ronald Evans stabbed a spider tank (controlled by Hitler's brain in a jar) with an American flag.
Leviticus 19:34The point is, Conspiracy-theories are just plain stupid, due to being born from the desire of insignificant people who have never accomplished anything in life, trying to accomplish something by being "the first" with anything, even creating nonsense about something else, just for the right and self-serving satisfaction of "being smarter than anyone else" doing so.
However, when people with power, people who can do serious harm with it, starts believing them, then things starts to get dangerous and serious, as the current president demonstrates just fine with some fuel to the fire from his ghoul lawyer Rudy and daily overdose of Fox News.
It's all just distraction from reality, nothing else.
—-
That said, if Trump got re-elected for a second term, what would be the full-scale damage be to the country and the world at large if he were to be allowed to carry on as he has for the last three years?
Would the US survive that or not?

The only thing the President has any real direct control over is foreign policy.
Otherwise they need an executive order to enact any policy changes and those can be overridden by Congress.
There no "monarchy aspects", the President as a position is quite powerless in terms of direct legislative impact.
Edited by LeGarcon on Oct 5th 2019 at 1:31:38 PM
Oh really when?