Nov 2023 Mod notice:
There may be other, more specific, threads about some aspects of US politics, but this one tends to act as a hub for all sorts of related news and information, so it's usually one of the busiest OTC threads.
If you're new to OTC, it's worth reading the Introduction to On-Topic Conversations
and the On-Topic Conversations debate guidelines
before posting here.
Rumor-based, fear-mongering and/or inflammatory statements that damage the quality of the thread will be thumped. Off-topic posts will also be thumped. Repeat offenders may be suspended.
If time spent moderating this thread remains a distraction from moderation of the wiki itself, the thread will need to be locked. We want to avoid that, so please follow the forum rules
when posting here.
In line with the general forum rules, 'gravedancing' is prohibited here. If you're celebrating someone's death or hoping that they die, your post will get thumped. This rule applies regardless of what the person you're discussing has said or done.
Edited by Mrph1 on Nov 30th 2023 at 11:03:59 AM
Or Handsome Jack. Remember, that guy has a sense of humor and a diamond pony!
ASAB: All Sponsors Are Bad.Warren is winning over liberal democrats, but that alone is not enough.
I can't wait for the young, progressive base of the party to finally take over, because right now, the moderates would rather have someone who seems confused and not too inspiring for electability.
Edited by Grafite on Sep 3rd 2019 at 9:04:55 AM
Life is unfair..."For the sake of ELECTABILITY, we need a candidate who will utterly fail to excite the base and inspire voter turnout." ~Biden supporters.
Edited by TobiasDrake on Sep 3rd 2019 at 2:03:01 AM
My Tumblr. Currently side-by-side liveblogging Digimon Adventure, sub vs dub.For the sake of electability, we need a candidate that does not scare the other side into re-voting Trump.
People need to stop acting as if turnout on your side is the only thing that matter. It just does not.
"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard Feynman@Septimus: Clinton thought that was a good strategy too, but it failed miserably. The #neverTrump suburbanites in blue states can be lost, they mostly used to vote Republican anyway. Base turnout needs to be the focus, which is how Democrats lost the Rust Belt.
Life is unfair...Because if Warren was electrifying the base...she'd be winning.
Hillary won the primary, that is not evidence of being very effective in the general.
People need to stop acting as if turnout on your side is the only thing that matter. It just does not.
The other side is going to be whipped into a frenzy about whatever Democrat we choose, deciding against a candidate out of fear of offending Republicans is never going to be a rational strategy.
The turnout so far for Warren has been abyssal.
I suggest you pay better attention, Warren started very low and has been steadily gaining steam.
It's absolute nonsense to say that the turnout for Warren has been abysmal.
Edited by Fourthspartan56 on Sep 3rd 2019 at 1:20:20 AM
"Einstein would turn over in his grave. Not only does God play dice, the dice are loaded." -Chairman Sheng-Ji YangHillary did fine in the general election and as a Bernie Sanders voter, I don't pretend to think he would have done better against Trump. She was a very popular candidate despite all the shade thrown on her. Her losses were due to a very effective campaign run by Trump.
Simple on brand messaging, fame from the fact Trump is a television star, and good old fashioned racism [vomits].
And let's face it, a few hundred votes in the right place would have saved us from our long national nightmare.
Author of The Rules of Supervillainy, Cthulhu Armageddon, and United States of Monsters.The other side is going to be whipped into a frenzy about whatever Democrat we choose, deciding against a candidate out of fear of offending Republicans is never going to be a rational strategy.
I don't think that this is correct. Pushing extreme candidates often stimulates turnout on the other side and a lot of people are motivated more by a dislike of the other side than by their liking of their own. These people are not dependable for their own side, though.
"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard FeynmanSimple on brand messaging, fame from the fact Trump is a television star, and good old fashioned racism [vomits].
And let's face it, a few hundred votes in the right place would have saved us from our long national nightmare.
I'm not saying that she was incompetent, just that she won the general but still had weaknesses (such as decades of Republican smears) that led her to being defeated in the General.
Winning a primary is evidence for being electable enough to win a primary, and not necessarily anything else.
Maybe, but what exactly would be an "extreme candidate"?
Should we accept Biden's milquetoast mediocrity just because we're too afraid of offending Republicans?
I'd rather a candidate who actually stands for bringing sweeping change instead of one who seems to be the poster child for why septuagenarian candidates often are a terrible idea.
Edited by Fourthspartan56 on Sep 3rd 2019 at 1:55:46 AM
"Einstein would turn over in his grave. Not only does God play dice, the dice are loaded." -Chairman Sheng-Ji YangI think now would be a good time to remind the thread that during the first Dem debates the Trump campaign was running an attack ad against Biden. This magical candidate that's supposed to not motivate Republicans to come out in drives to vote Trump to keep a Democrat out of office doesn't exist.
i'm tired, my friendIndeed, this is another reason why we should focus on bold candidates who will actually do something like that.
Excellent example

Believe me, if I have a choice between voting for Mitch Mc Connell and the Emperor, then I'm probably voting Sith Lord.
Author of The Rules of Supervillainy, Cthulhu Armageddon, and United States of Monsters.