Nov 2023 Mod notice:
There may be other, more specific, threads about some aspects of US politics, but this one tends to act as a hub for all sorts of related news and information, so it's usually one of the busiest OTC threads.
If you're new to OTC, it's worth reading the Introduction to On-Topic Conversations
and the On-Topic Conversations debate guidelines
before posting here.
Rumor-based, fear-mongering and/or inflammatory statements that damage the quality of the thread will be thumped. Off-topic posts will also be thumped. Repeat offenders may be suspended.
If time spent moderating this thread remains a distraction from moderation of the wiki itself, the thread will need to be locked. We want to avoid that, so please follow the forum rules
when posting here.
In line with the general forum rules, 'gravedancing' is prohibited here. If you're celebrating someone's death or hoping that they die, your post will get thumped. This rule applies regardless of what the person you're discussing has said or done.
Edited by Mrph1 on Nov 30th 2023 at 11:03:59 AM
I think it might be too early to tell, but at the moment my money is on Trump. None of the Democrats excite me and make me want to vote democrat. There is potential, but only if the Democrats present a united front. I think the biggest thing that they have going against them is their broad labeling of everyone who voted for or likes Trump as being irredeemably evil. It's cutting of their nose to spite your face and it's going to cost them.
Here
is the link to RealClearPolitics' general election poll data. Haven't looked at it myself but it'd be good to put numbers to the ideas.
Edited by Aleistar on Jul 22nd 2019 at 12:43:58 PM
Most likely gonna vote Democrat, as long as the person they send is reasonably moderate.
Leviticus 19:34
I repeat my question ![]()
![]()
.
Granted, in your case, if I'm remembering correctly, you're a Republican (?), but does it actually matter how moderate or not the Democratic candidate is, given the alternative is a proven buffoon who regularly demonstrates he's unfit for the job? note
I hate "Their side bad!" politics, and have said so repeatedly, but that's where we are right now, whether I like it or not. I can not fathom anything that would justify not actively voting against Trump.
I repeat my last sentence before this one.
Edited by sgamer82 on Jul 22nd 2019 at 10:50:20 AM
I left the republican Party because of Trump. When I said I studied Trump, it also meant that I was against him from pretty much day one. I am a libertarian. I'm planning to vote Libertarian currently. People say that I both sides things, it's because I really do think that both sides suck. I've already resigned myself to never winning an election again. There are some pretty hard nos on the Democrat side of things, some of the more important of which can't be discussed here.
>I hate "Their side bad!" politics, and have said so repeatedly, but that's where we are right now, whether I like it or not. I can not fathom anything that would justify not actively voting against Trump.
To a degree, I agree with you. Part of the reason I'm planning to vote the way I am is because I'm voting for something rather then against something. Also, I am voting against Trump. I'm just not also voting for something I really don't agree with.
Edited by Soban on Jul 22nd 2019 at 12:54:52 PM
The biggest problem with that sort of thinking is that you end up causing what you didn't want to happen happen because you didn't just hold your nose and vote for the person who had the greatest chance of beating Trump. Your sort of thinking is one of the many reasons Trump won 2016.
Weren't there enough non-Clinton, non-Trump voters who voted for a third-party (either joke or otherwise) who could have turned multiple states?
"We're all paper, we're all scissors, we're all fightin' with our mirrors, scared we'll never find somebody to love."@sgamer82 I'm a Conservative and technically am a Republican. I should note "reasonably moderate" primarily means things like "thinks vaccines are good" and "isn't a single issue wonk socialist who ignores all other issues such as racism or sexism".
Leviticus 19:34Most of the polls have Sanders and Biden winning vs Trump by the most comfortable margins.
Also, while I would never count chickens before they hatch, unless the voter suppression/russian interference is ridiculously effective (or some other unforeseen thing happens), I think Donald's chances are not that great.
Before the election, Donald at least had the "benefit of the doubt" (well, he didn't, but a lot of people thought he did) because he had no record as a politician for people to compare to. But now he does, and his only benefit is that the economy hasn't tanked under his watch yet, something that has been speculated might happen yet before 2020. Otherwise he isn't exactly very popular.
Your argument seems to be that I should vote against my least preferred option. However, 'their side bad' politics isn't what we want to be doing. So what should we do instead? Obviously, it's 'our side good politics. Looking at it through that lens, the Libertarians are the one that I like the most.
![]()
![]()
![]()
Let's say for a moment that it's Bernie v Trump. Are you honestly saying that having someone that "ignores all other issues such as racism or sexism" would be no better than someone that is both actually racist and sexist?
Even if you dislike Bernie, you can't say that those scales balance.
Edited by TheRoguePenguin on Jul 22nd 2019 at 10:18:17 AM
On the polling data, I think it's important to remember that Trump consistently polls lower than he should. People are embarrassed to admit they support him, but will vote for him when it's private
And comparison to 2016 is pointless since being the incumbent is a massive advantage
Do not get complacent
There are no shy Trump voters, says pollster
The "shy Trump voter" thing was just one of the things people came up with to try to make sense of how Trump won even though polls supposedly confirmed he had no chance.
When in truth it was just a matter of margins of error and most people being kind of shit at actually understanding what polls are telling us.
Edited by M84 on Jul 23rd 2019 at 1:46:17 AM
Disgusted, but not surprisedThat and voters who had a negative opinion of both Hillary and Trump ended up going pretty overwhelmingly for Trump at the last second due to Comey.
Clinton won nationally by pretty much exactly what the polls said she’d win by, but she lost in certain states due to a big segment of “they both suck” voters deciding to vote for Trump.
As for the third party argument, I can see the logic of voting third party if one honestly believes that they are the better option, in the end change has to be built up from somewhere. I just don’t see how the US Greens or the Libertarian Party are the better option compared to the democrats, what positives do they have to offer that Dems don’t? Because reflexive third party voting is just a version of “their side bad” with a plural stuck on the end.
Edited by Silasw on Jul 22nd 2019 at 6:03:44 PM
“And the Bunny nails it!” ~ Gabrael “If the UN can get through a day without everyone strangling everyone else so can we.” ~ Cyran"John," Trump asked, "Is Ireland one of those countries you want to invade?"

I feel like they don't have that kind of self-awareness. For the most part, anyway.
Edited by LSBK on Jul 22nd 2019 at 10:06:51 AM