Nov 2023 Mod notice:
There may be other, more specific, threads about some aspects of US politics, but this one tends to act as a hub for all sorts of related news and information, so it's usually one of the busiest OTC threads.
If you're new to OTC, it's worth reading the Introduction to On-Topic Conversations
and the On-Topic Conversations debate guidelines
before posting here.
Rumor-based, fear-mongering and/or inflammatory statements that damage the quality of the thread will be thumped. Off-topic posts will also be thumped. Repeat offenders may be suspended.
If time spent moderating this thread remains a distraction from moderation of the wiki itself, the thread will need to be locked. We want to avoid that, so please follow the forum rules
when posting here.
In line with the general forum rules, 'gravedancing' is prohibited here. If you're celebrating someone's death or hoping that they die, your post will get thumped. This rule applies regardless of what the person you're discussing has said or done.
Edited by Mrph1 on Nov 30th 2023 at 11:03:59 AM
Yeah - when they can't say racist shit, its free speech violations.
When they want to shut down free speech, its just their right to freedom of association.
The right wing has never been consistent in application of standards. They have one standard for the "undesirables" and one standard for the All American (c).
The right always designates undesirables, because that's in their nature. They need a scapegoat for why Trad never lasts.
Edited by NickTheSwing on Jul 8th 2019 at 10:45:35 AM
I do wonder if from a raw logistical perspective you’d be better doing recreations for Jim-Crow, the effect would be much the same (massive investment into the African American community, particularly in the south) but it would probably be easier to administer (the only record you need is if a person was resident in an area when it had Jim-Crow) and much harder for anyone to argue against (you’re compensating the people who were directly impacted, or possibly their children or grandchildren if you want to backdate it a fair bit).
It just feels like a good response to do “find me a former slave and I’ll give them reparations” to go “I’ve got plenty of living folks who suffered under Jim-Crow, let’s him them reparations”.
Edited by Silasw on Jul 8th 2019 at 5:56:26 PM
“And the Bunny nails it!” ~ Gabrael “If the UN can get through a day without everyone strangling everyone else so can we.” ~ CyranYes, I used to think freedom of speech should be protected absolutely.
Then I realized that the people who claimed it most ardently did not care about it from people that opposed them.
You defended a monster's right to free speech...and then he tried to take away that of other's.
So it was a pointless gesture that only helped monsters.
Author of The Rules of Supervillainy, Cthulhu Armageddon, and United States of Monsters.Sick
Certified: 48.0% West Asian, 6.5% South Asian, 15.8% North/West European, 15.7% English, 7.4% Balkan, 6.6% ScandinavianHonestly, no-one is consistent in application of standards. States' rights? Well, only when your state wants to do something the federal government doesn't want! Equal time for the other side? Only when you're the "other side" and in the minority.
Just about all of our alleged core ideals: freedom of speech, freedom of association, everything - is treated as little more than tactics to win a fight, and ready to be thrown away when not useful.
I found it strange how so many self-described libertarians stopped being libertarians when Donald Trump showed up. But not anymore. To many of them, libertarianism would create a dog-eat-dog world where their own people would end up on top, but if the government would help them be on top anyway, then who needs libertarianism and smaller government? So they abandon what they pretended were core principles in exchange for what they really want.
Edited by BonsaiForest on Jul 9th 2019 at 8:11:13 AM
Amy McGrath, Democrat Fighter Pilot, is challenging Mitch McConnell in the next Senate election.
https://twitter.com/bpolitics/status/1148563418393272325
Good for her.
The issue I don't think is whether she'll be more popular than Mitch, because again Mitch has historic levels of unpopularity, it's the fact that Mitch and his army of orcs cheat.
Edited by CharlesPhipps on Jul 9th 2019 at 5:09:43 AM
Author of The Rules of Supervillainy, Cthulhu Armageddon, and United States of Monsters.FYI - Barr has recused himself from the Epstein case.
I fully expect Trump to be furious about this.
Best news I've heard all day.
Author of The Rules of Supervillainy, Cthulhu Armageddon, and United States of Monsters.The challenge to the Evil Turtle is even better. I wish the challenger good luck.
Regarding the Epstein case, is it just me or do the events/relationships around that man look ironically similar to QAnon? Except for the latter being fictitious, of course.
"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard FeynmanThe Evil Turtle was challenged by perfectly valid candidates in the past including the well-liked and radical (for Kentucky) Alison Grimes.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alison_Lundergan_Grimes
He's not been running unchallenged, he just does his best to deny them airtime and votes.
Author of The Rules of Supervillainy, Cthulhu Armageddon, and United States of Monsters.I mean, Trump hasn't been "right" for that long. The Clintons attended his last wedding. He contributed to the Clinton foundation. When Trump was most directly involved with Epstein (included saying Epstein likes women younger than he does), Trump was a registered Democrat.
As weird as it is (considering he really is the embodiment of the GOP's id), he never really was "right" or "left." He just was a mercenary, courting whomever he pleased. And he's learned that courting the worst of the GOP is the easiest.
Given Epstein's ties and his background, I'd wager he skews Democratic.
Edited by Larkmarn on Jul 9th 2019 at 10:09:13 AM
Found a Youtube Channel with political stances you want to share? Hop on over to this page and add them.Re: Mitch's challenger. Very interesting, will be reading up on her positions and submitting a donation to her campaign.
Though, I question if she can beat him. KY has a Republican partisan lean of +23, and while Mitch has a net approval of -13 (both figures according to Five Thirty Eight), there may not be enough potential Democratic voters to put her over the top. Especially since a Republican is often preferred over conservative Democrats.
It's simply not fertile ground for blue victories.
"For all those whose cares have been our concern, the work goes on, the cause endures, the hope still lives, and the dream shall never die."If it was a fair election she'd certainly win but Kentucky does not have fair elections.
https://rantt.com/the-top-10-most-gerrymandered-states-in-america/
We're No. 5
Like much of the South, Kentucky continues to suffer unequal representation as a result of gerrymandering. Nearly 35% of the vote statewide goes to Democrats, but only five out of six representatives are Republican. A strategy of continuing to cram growing urban populations into existing district boundaries has resulted in much of the lopsided representation. The following districts have large urban populations that have been cut out of other districts and attached to sprawling rural areas.
Edited by CharlesPhipps on Jul 9th 2019 at 7:29:18 AM
Author of The Rules of Supervillainy, Cthulhu Armageddon, and United States of Monsters.Even if it is an uphill battle, the stronger his opponent, the more the Republicans have to divert resources from other critical places to keep Mc Connell safe.
On a more amusing note: a judge has ruled that Trump can't block his critics on Twitter.
Edited by Parable on Jul 9th 2019 at 7:48:15 AM

And that's when the bully isn't claiming they're the victim (another favorite tactic of the right).
i'm tired, my friend