Nov 2023 Mod notice:
There may be other, more specific, threads about some aspects of US politics, but this one tends to act as a hub for all sorts of related news and information, so it's usually one of the busiest OTC threads.
If you're new to OTC, it's worth reading the Introduction to On-Topic Conversations
and the On-Topic Conversations debate guidelines
before posting here.
Rumor-based, fear-mongering and/or inflammatory statements that damage the quality of the thread will be thumped. Off-topic posts will also be thumped. Repeat offenders may be suspended.
If time spent moderating this thread remains a distraction from moderation of the wiki itself, the thread will need to be locked. We want to avoid that, so please follow the forum rules
when posting here.
In line with the general forum rules, 'gravedancing' is prohibited here. If you're celebrating someone's death or hoping that they die, your post will get thumped. This rule applies regardless of what the person you're discussing has said or done.
Edited by Mrph1 on Nov 30th 2023 at 11:03:59 AM
Skewed to the right of Europe yes, world as a whole not really, its actually decently left there.
We in Asia are much farther right, as is most of South Amercia, and Africa.
I mean hell in most of the world, homosexuality is still a crime, and in lots of places punishable by death.
Edited by Imca on May 20th 2019 at 2:00:11 AM
Like that early episode of The Man Show where they got people signing a petition to end Womens' Suffrage.
Edited by sgamer82 on May 20th 2019 at 3:00:46 AM
![]()
![]()
Yes, but if you actually read the question, it was worded "should schools teach Arabic numerals as part of the curriculum?", not "Should there be Arabic numerals in school". That is the difference between this question and the reaction of this NPD politician I was talking about. The NPD politician immediately jumped on the notion that people might use Arabic numbers to number their own houses and was absolutely against the notion (the moderate, but still ignorant answer would have been "people only have to make sure that there is also a number in German used, so that people are not confused" (yes, there is actually a rule in Germany about having a number on your house and light in during the night so that people don't get confused). The reaction to "Should the school teach Arabic numerals as part of the curriculum?" can just as well answered with the some line of thought in mind you might have if the question were "Should the school teach Cyrillic/greek letters as part of the curriculum?"´. Meaning: What for? There are really more useful subjects they should learn.
To me this question shows that one third of the asked democratic voters were ignorant about using Arabic numbers, not necessarily that all of them were kind of racist. Unless naturally there were other questions which would provide a clearer picture.
Edited by Swanpride on May 20th 2019 at 2:10:25 AM
Well there was another question worded something like "Should the creation theory proposed by Catholic priest Charles Lemaitre be part of school science curriculum?" The trick being that Father Lemaitre came up with the Big Bang theory. Democrats were overwhelmingly more likely to vote no.
While a small subset of the way people answered may be due to simple ignorance and not caring, the larger trend usually shows signs of bigotry/prejudice.
Edited by danime91 on May 20th 2019 at 2:22:54 AM
![]()
So it was specifically designed to trick people and give "wrong" answers. Other than proving just how badly you can skew the results of a poll by asking the questions in just the right way, I don't see how this poll has much value to any topic at hand.
Edited by Kayeka on May 20th 2019 at 11:24:38 AM
RE the Arabic numerals issue: Fun fact, the actual name for the numeral symbols used by the Arabic language is "Eastern
Arabic numerals
", whereas what is commonly referred to as simply "Arabic numerals
" has the more distinct-looking-and-sounding alternate name of "Western Arabic numerals".
Edited by MarqFJA on May 20th 2019 at 12:28:31 PM
Fiat iustitia, et pereat mundus.![]()
![]()
Because it reveals biases and also strips away the mask of "it's not about racism". Education level for both Democrats and Republicans is more or less equal, according to that poll. Meaning if the answers were solely based on ignorance, then the results should have been about the same. In the case of the Arabic numerals question, Republicans were overwhelmingly more against it than Democrats were. Showing that there's definitely an element of racial bias.
Edited by danime91 on May 20th 2019 at 2:29:43 AM
If anything, the "Should the creation theory proposed by Catholic priest Charles Lemaitre be part of school science curriculum?" question proofs my point. The democrats were most likely more likely to vote "no" because they assumed that the creation theory of a priest would be anti-scientific, while the Republicans didn't care either way. If the democrats were both pretty ignorant about a number of things and answered the question based on "does this sound like it would make sense to have it into a curriculum?" I can see how they wouldn't think that the creation theory by some priest and some foreign looking numbers wouldn't be high on the priority list.
Plus, this shows even more that the whole thing was designed to Gotcha people. If anything, it shows how easily it is to manipulate people. Plus, looking through the twitter feed, the guy who posted it apparently mostly did it to make the "see, democrats are just as bigoted as republicans" point. Or, to put it differently, he is making the "on both sides" argument.
Yes, but it is impossible to tell how much of it was race bias and how much of it was "what a useless subject" bias. Also, education level tells you nothing about the level of ignorance in specific subjects. I am sure that there are college professors out there who don't know that we use arabic numberals or at least wouldn't necessarily remember the fact while doing some questionaire.
If you wanted to test the race bias, you should have asked "is it okay if people decorate their house with arabic numbers".
Edited by Swanpride on May 20th 2019 at 2:44:22 AM
There are like 20 candidates, arguments that Bernie is better then Biden aren't actually very strong.
"Einstein would turn over in his grave. Not only does God play dice, the dice are loaded." -Chairman Sheng-Ji Yang
Maybe I'm overly confident, but I'm anticipating that Bernie and Biden will be the only candidates by the time most tropers here vote. Just due to how much below them the other candidates have been polling, only rising with their 15 minutes of fame.
I think by the time voting starts, we’ll be down to 5-7 serious candidates. I hope to god it’s not just Biden and Bernie though; that’d be awful. And why does everyone keep assuming they’re unbeatable? At this point in prior primaries, front runners have included people like Herman Cain and Joe Lieberman.
Edited by wisewillow on May 20th 2019 at 3:19:31 AM
This is actually a creation of SCIENTISTS and not at all uncommon in academia as "Gotcha!" questions are designed to state that polls and many often decisions are created in ignorance of the subject. The issue of "low information voters" and how they can contribute to the problem. Academics use them to basically try to teach people to work harder on understanding before voting.
If you're surprised by the "Are you against Arabic Numerals in School" and "Are you against Catholic Science?" then you're probably more familiar with the joke pitch that many have made about banning Dihydrogen monoxide from a school district.
It's one of the most common science jokes you can make.
Similarly, you can say, "Are you against outdated Victorian genetics? Are you aware the schools still teach the work of a monk named Gregor in Biology?"
Mind you, polls are often like this:
Edited by CharlesPhipps on May 20th 2019 at 5:13:02 AM
Author of The Rules of Supervillainy, Cthulhu Armageddon, and United States of Monsters.
Its in there 18%
![]()
Ignorance or Mallice doesnt matter when the result is the same, and the result is what is being discussed in that most people are low information voters who dont exactly agree with the more left ideas, but are rather just fine with the status quo...
If you react negatively to the word Arabic because you dont understand at the end of the day thats just ad much a problem as ang other reason.
Edited by Imca on May 20th 2019 at 5:54:09 AM
For simplicity's sake, the numbers on the teaching Arabic numbers question: "56% of respondents said no, 29% said yes and 15% chose no opinion."
When their political affiliations were clarified: 72% of Republicans said no. 57% percent of Independents said no. 34% of Democrats said said no.
On the other question concerning teaching the "creation theory of Catholic priest George Lemaitre as part of their science curriculum" the answers were:
53% said No, 20% said Yes, and 27% said No Opinion.
"Of the respondents who said no, 73% of them identified as Democrats."
Honestly, I'll defend the people who said No on that second question. Even knowing it's a trick question going in, my initial thoughts were to assume the question is talking about Creationism (Young Earth Creationism, to be specific). And frankly, I suspect that the people who said Yes, regardless of political affiliation were also under the impression they were supporting Creationism as well.

You say we're skewed to the left of the USA, I say the USA is skewed far, far right of the free world.
Regardless, it's come up before and I'll say it again, the press is the source of a lot of harm to the American people. I don't see how to fix the problems while TV news has a hold, but hopefully cable/satellite TV is on the way out sooner rather than later.
Edited by ShinyCottonCandy on May 20th 2019 at 5:02:56 AM
My musician page