Nov 2023 Mod notice:
There may be other, more specific, threads about some aspects of US politics, but this one tends to act as a hub for all sorts of related news and information, so it's usually one of the busiest OTC threads.
If you're new to OTC, it's worth reading the Introduction to On-Topic Conversations
and the On-Topic Conversations debate guidelines
before posting here.
Rumor-based, fear-mongering and/or inflammatory statements that damage the quality of the thread will be thumped. Off-topic posts will also be thumped. Repeat offenders may be suspended.
If time spent moderating this thread remains a distraction from moderation of the wiki itself, the thread will need to be locked. We want to avoid that, so please follow the forum rules
when posting here.
In line with the general forum rules, 'gravedancing' is prohibited here. If you're celebrating someone's death or hoping that they die, your post will get thumped. This rule applies regardless of what the person you're discussing has said or done.
Edited by Mrph1 on Nov 30th 2023 at 11:03:59 AM
Someone mentioned Ken Starr earlier in this thread. Well, he's at it again: Ken Starr complains that the Mueller report has too many footnotes, saying "this is not a term paper."
Yes, you heard right: He's complaining that Mueller's report was too thorough. 'Cause, you know, it's not like they were investigating something important or anything, and wouldn't need to be specific about what they uncovered, and wouldn't need to be airtight in case of lawsuits.
I'm sure Ken would've loved a two page report that would've said in giant letters "NO COLLUSION" on one page and "NO OBSTRUCTION" on the other. Sheesh.
Edited by speedyboris on May 9th 2019 at 12:21:13 PM
![]()
![]()
![]()
Yes, it may be modeled after the Ryan White CARE Act, but that involved dealing with a virus. That's a somewhat different problem than confronting an addictive drug that is being peddled by a powerful industry.
HIV at least didn't have lawyers.
Edited by M84 on May 10th 2019 at 1:32:35 AM
Disgusted, but not surprisedAnd holy fuck, Trump just got more blatant with the obstruction - he's now saying that William Barr will decide whether or not Mueller can testify before the House committee next week
. No points for guessing what Barr's decision will be, because fuck me Trump just doesn't give two shits about checks & balances, nor do the people he hires.
Trump has also stated that he wants John Kerry arrested.
https://twitter.com/TwitterMoments/status/1126547140241608704
Now he's trying to distract and threaten people into compliance.
Author of The Rules of Supervillainy, Cthulhu Armageddon, and United States of Monsters.And in more Rage Breaking Point news, the Alabama Senate caused an uproar by taking the proposed abortion ban legislation
and making it worse by stripping out the exceptions for incest and rape victims. They didn't even allow a roll call to vote on this happening, either. And this with a supermajority in the Senate, meaning they didn't even have to resort to that chicanery - the Democratic minority just wanted everyone on-record for their position. As a silver lining, the uproar has prompted that particular motion to be tabled for debate next week, so at least they'll get that voice vote like they wanted.
Oh, and unlike the fetal heartbeat bill, this one is a full ban on abortions, where doctors would be jailed but mothers, surprisingly, would face no consequences. Guess they got sick of being called the party that hates women.
Edited by ironballs16 on May 9th 2019 at 3:41:21 PM
"Why would I inflict myself on somebody else?"Once again, I'm definitely not an expert on this, but with William Barr committing contempt of congress, doesn't that mean that
A) He can officially be arrested for refusing to release the Mueller report?
and
B) Since he's in contempt of congress and can technically be arrested, any decisions he makes are null and void?
The House hasn't voted to hold him in contempt yet, just the Judiciary Committee. That's next on the to do list though.
And Trump is claiming executive privilege on the Report. So Barr is just claiming he's following the law and can't be held in contempt for that.
Which means we still have to go to court to get that sorted out.
So 538 just released a new metric, the Popularity Above Replacement Senator ranking,[1]
basically it takes the senator’s net approval rating and compares it to the state’s partisan lean, the difference between the two is the score and it basically shows how they compare to a generic senatorial candidate for their party in that state.
So Doug Jones does very well, having an approve rating on +6 in a state that is +27 Republican, Susan Collins also does well, having an approval rating of +13 in a state that is +5 Democrat.
What we can draw from this basically is that Collins and Jones will both do better in their states than their party’s presidential candidate will. If we split the difference between their approval rating and state’s partisan lean Jones comes out at -10.5 and Collins comes out at +4. That’s for a neutral environment, at their current approval ratings and with the post-2016 partisan lean of states.
I’ve done some number crunching and basically split the difference for all the 2020 senate races, then I’ve categorised them based on a Neutral Environment Score. I’ve listed every seat up in 2020 by this score, so it’s the rough outcome of the senate race if the popular vote goes exactly 50-50. The party of the seat’s incumbent is in brackets.
- Safe Democrat: Above +15 D
- Solid Democrat: Above +10 D
- Lean Democrat: Above +5 D
- Tilt Democrat: Above +0.1 D
- Tilt Republican: Above +0.1 R
- Lean Republican: Above +5 R
- Solid Republican: Above +10 R
- Safe Republican: Above +15 R
So in a neutral environment the senate stays the same (with Democrats gaining Colorado but loosing Alabama), if Democrats with the popular vote by 5 points they’d pick up a net 3.5 seats (counting Kentucky for half), if Republicans win the popular vote by 5 points they’d pick up a single seat, if Dems win by the same margin as the mid terms (8.6) they’d get a net 6 seats and thus a senate majority of 53-47.
“And the Bunny nails it!” ~ Gabrael “If the UN can get through a day without everyone strangling everyone else so can we.” ~ CyranThat's about the best thing I've heard since I started following this thread.
Given that the worst case scenario is only slightly worse than where we are now, and there'd be no effective difference than our current situation, come 2022, we may be able to actually see some things get improved.
Edited by ShinyCottonCandy on May 9th 2019 at 4:31:06 AM
My musician pageOther potentially good news:
Americans' support for impeaching Trump rises: Reuters/Ipsos poll
The opinion poll, conducted on Monday, did not make clear whether investigation-fatigued Americans wanted House of Representatives Democrats to pull back on their probes or press forward aggressively and just get impeachment over with.
The question is an urgent one for senior Democratic leaders in the House of Representatives, who are wrestling with whether to launch impeachment proceedings, despite likely insurmountable opposition to it in the Republican-controlled Senate.
On Thursday, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi re-emphasized that the leaders of the investigative committees in the Democratic-controlled House were taking a step-by-step approach.
“This is very methodical, it’s very Constitution-based,” Pelosi said. “We won’t go any faster than the facts take us, or any slower than the facts take us.”
In addition to the 45 percent pro-impeachment figure, the Monday poll found that 42 percent of Americans said Trump should not be impeached. The rest said they had no opinion.
In comparison, an April 18-19 survey found that 40 percent of all Americans wanted to impeach Trump.
The latest poll showed stronger support for impeachment among Democrats and independents.
It also showed that 57 percent of adults agreed that continued investigations into Trump would interfere with important government business. That included about half of all Democrats and three-quarters of all Republicans.
Any chance there was some survey done about impeaching Obama to help cast that in a starker contrast? I've got one forum I post in where there are die-hards on the Conservative side (read: "Trump won - GET OVER IT!"), and it'd be nice to shut them up preemptively.
"Why would I inflict myself on somebody else?"

Not sure if this was posted already, but Warren just rolled out a bill to fight the opioid epidemic.
Highlights:
Under the CARE Act, states and communities will receive $100 billion in federal funding over the next ten years — because that’s what’s needed to make sure every single person gets the treatment they need. Here’s how that breaks down each year:
$4 billion for states, territories, and tribal governments;
$2.7 billion for the hardest hit counties and cities, including $1.4 billion to counties and cities with the highest levels of overdoses;
$1.7 billion for public health surveillance, research, and improved training for health professionals;
$1.1 billion for public and nonprofit entities on the front lines, including those working with underserved populations and workers at high risk for addiction, and to support expanded and innovative service delivery of treatment, recovery, and harm reduction services;
$500 million to expand access to naloxone and provide this life-saving overdose reversal drug to first responders, public health departments, and the public.
Resources would be used to support the whole continuum of care, from early intervention for those at risk for addiction, to harm reduction for those struggling with addiction, to long-term support services for those in recovery. Along with addiction treatment, the CARE Act would ensure access to mental health services and help provide critical wraparound services like housing support and medical transportation for those who need them.
But the CARE Act doesn’t just provide resources to communities, it also works to strengthen our addiction treatment infrastructure — demanding states use Medicaid to its fullest to tackle the crisis, expanding access to medication-assisted treatment, and ensuring treatment programs and recovery residences meet high standards.