Nov 2023 Mod notice:
There may be other, more specific, threads about some aspects of US politics, but this one tends to act as a hub for all sorts of related news and information, so it's usually one of the busiest OTC threads.
If you're new to OTC, it's worth reading the Introduction to On-Topic Conversations
and the On-Topic Conversations debate guidelines
before posting here.
Rumor-based, fear-mongering and/or inflammatory statements that damage the quality of the thread will be thumped. Off-topic posts will also be thumped. Repeat offenders may be suspended.
If time spent moderating this thread remains a distraction from moderation of the wiki itself, the thread will need to be locked. We want to avoid that, so please follow the forum rules
when posting here.
In line with the general forum rules, 'gravedancing' is prohibited here. If you're celebrating someone's death or hoping that they die, your post will get thumped. This rule applies regardless of what the person you're discussing has said or done.
Edited by Mrph1 on Nov 30th 2023 at 11:03:59 AM
Given that United States vs Nixon
is a fairly clear precedent, hopefully the Mueller Report will be seen soon.
So now, just like his tax returns, congress isn't likely to see the entire Mueller report. I'm honestly not surprised considering the other things Trump has done. But it's not like Trump will never face any punishments for all of the illegal shit he's done. Now maybe if the country managed to elect another republican as bad as him when he's out of office (Reagan was pardoned by Ford after all), but it's unlikely.
x2 That's uncharted waters, I'm pretty sure. And of all the people who can be held in contempt, I'd argue that the President is (sadly) not one of them. But if Congress wants to try it, I say more power to them to see if I'm wrong and they're right. Still won't get Trump out of Office, though.
x3 It certainly sounds like it should be illegal.
Edited by DingoWalley1 on May 8th 2019 at 11:11:40 AM
Someone please remind me why "impeachment is required before taking the POTUS to court" is even a thing. I vaguely remember that it was explained here a long time ago, but I cannot remember at the moment when or what the explanation was.
Fiat iustitia, et pereat mundus.The idea is basically that being the President is a very difficult and very critical job for the United States, and that it would make it more difficult for the President to do his job effectively if he had to constantly drop what he's doing to answer potentially frivolous lawsuits or face a barrage of potentially-invented criminal allegations from the opposition party.
The same laws protecting Trump from prosecution for his real actual crimes also meant that Mitch McConnell couldn't, say, continuously accuse Obama of punching a member of the Republican Senate, inventing a new accusation every time the previous Obama-Punch Trial concludes.
Until the end of his term, the President is expected to spend 100% of his time being President. So he's given an informal stay of prosecution from any accusations against him.
Edited by TobiasDrake on May 8th 2019 at 10:27:51 AM
My Tumblr. Currently side-by-side liveblogging Digimon Adventure, sub vs dub.Hawley will introduce the bill, “The Protecting Children from Abusive Games Act,” to the U.S. Senate soon. In press materials announcing the bill, Hawley’s team brought up the Activision game Candy Crush as an egregious example of pay-to-win microtransactions thanks to its $150 “Luscious Bundle” that comes with a whole bunch of goodies. This bill will also likely apply to a host of online games that feature loot boxes and other ways in which players can spend money for real benefits.
“When a game is designed for kids, game developers shouldn’t be allowed to monetize addiction,” Hawley said in a press release. “And when kids play games designed for adults, they should be walled off from compulsive microtransactions. Game developers who knowingly exploit children should face legal consequences.”
Last fall, the Federal Trade Commission promised to investigate loot boxes following a letter from Senator Maggie Hassan (D-NH) that she wrote in the wake of 2017's string of games featuring the heavy usage of predatory microtransactions, such as Middle-earth: Shadow of War and Star Wars Battlefront II. Although some companies have pulled back on the practice, popular games like Overwatch, FIFA, and Apex Legends continue to make big money off randomized microtransactions. Many of those games are played by both adults and children.
Hawley, 39, has become known in Washington for criticizing major tech companies Facebook and Google, often accusing them of anti-conservative bias.
UPDATE (12:18pm): The Entertainment Software Association, the video game industry lobbyist group, sent over a statement shortly after this bill was introduced: “Numerous countries, including Ireland, Germany, Sweden, Denmark, Australia, New Zealand, and the United Kingdom, determined that loot boxes do not constitute gambling. We look forward to sharing with the senator the tools and information the industry already provides that keeps the control of in-game spending in parents’ hands. Parents already have the ability to limit or prohibit in-game purchases with easy to use parental controls.”
WalMart will raise the tobacco purchasing age to 21 for all its US stores on July 1st.
A Republican actually proposing a bill I kind of think is a good idea. That doesn't happen very often.
Granted, I'm thinking this might also be a Right for the Wrong Reasons situation, but still.
Edited by M84 on May 9th 2019 at 1:14:27 AM
Disgusted, but not surprisedIf the games are sold hard copy only they could still exist, they’d just be age restricted products the same as lottery tickets.
Or you’d only be able to play them inside a gambling establishment like a casino.
Edited by Silasw on May 8th 2019 at 5:22:06 PM
“And the Bunny nails it!” ~ Gabrael “If the UN can get through a day without everyone strangling everyone else so can we.” ~ CyranEh, I value life purely based on its use to our civilization and I strongly oppose such nonsense.
Biodiversity is greatly beneficial to humanity and the only reason to ignore that is because of self-centered and myopic greed. So I think that's a more relevant reason for his (and other anti-environmentalists) positions.
Edited by Fourthspartan56 on May 8th 2019 at 10:21:33 AM
"Einstein would turn over in his grave. Not only does God play dice, the dice are loaded." -Chairman Sheng-Ji Yang
The "other life" they are talking about also includes other human beings.
It's kind of a given that climate change is going to really fuck over the people who are both least equipped to handle it and are probably the least responsible for it.
Edited by M84 on May 9th 2019 at 1:24:13 AM
Disgusted, but not surprisedIt's kind of a given that climate change is going to fuck over the people who are both least equipped to handle it and are probably the least responsible for it.
No doubt, hence why I think Republicans are driven by selfishness alongside the myopic greed. Because they don't really care what happens to poor people, the fact those poor people are often minorities likely just makes it easier.
"Einstein would turn over in his grave. Not only does God play dice, the dice are loaded." -Chairman Sheng-Ji YangThey should extend this bill to forbid any microtransactions from paid games, because if you pay 60$ for a game and the publisher still hold content from the player, that is just blatant extortion.
Put an age limit over F 2 P play games, they're digitally distributed anyway, and no one had any problems in those days.

Good to hear that this doesn't stop the Contempt train.
And know we just wait to the courts to do their job, hopefully. At least now we know for certain that there is shit in the report that Trump and friends don't want out there.
Politics is the skilled use of blunt objects.