Nov 2023 Mod notice:
There may be other, more specific, threads about some aspects of US politics, but this one tends to act as a hub for all sorts of related news and information, so it's usually one of the busiest OTC threads.
If you're new to OTC, it's worth reading the Introduction to On-Topic Conversations
and the On-Topic Conversations debate guidelines
before posting here.
Rumor-based, fear-mongering and/or inflammatory statements that damage the quality of the thread will be thumped. Off-topic posts will also be thumped. Repeat offenders may be suspended.
If time spent moderating this thread remains a distraction from moderation of the wiki itself, the thread will need to be locked. We want to avoid that, so please follow the forum rules
when posting here.
In line with the general forum rules, 'gravedancing' is prohibited here. If you're celebrating someone's death or hoping that they die, your post will get thumped. This rule applies regardless of what the person you're discussing has said or done.
Edited by Mrph1 on Nov 30th 2023 at 11:03:59 AM
I think that may be a major factor as they seem to have very little interest in the "issues" per se but more the rhetoric. They seem to take "their guy" (once chosen) as someone who will improve things at their word rather than voting on the actual policies to do so.
My mother insists, for example, Trump has made our lives better when he's done exactly the opposite.
There's also a weird thing you'll note among wealthy Kentuckians but a decent chunk feel the desire to vote for who they think will win regardless of whether they support him. I wouldn't bring this up except for the fact that lots and lots of people have said it at the parties.
Many Obama supporters just went with it because they called it like a horse race.
Author of The Rules of Supervillainy, Cthulhu Armageddon, and United States of Monsters.This. This is precisely why I think Democratic candidates trying to make their case on FOX News is a terrible, terrible idea.
FOX News is a blight upon this world. We shouldn't be doing anything that could make people think it is not.
Edited by M84 on Apr 20th 2019 at 11:20:39 PM
Disgusted, but not surprisedMind you, in the circles my parents ran, they actually did a lot of government contracts and picking their "horse" involved donating campaign money and expected favors.
So it wasn't just for funsies.
My dad wasn't wealthy enough to buy anyone but he represented people who were.
Author of The Rules of Supervillainy, Cthulhu Armageddon, and United States of Monsters.People change in four years. There's barely any policy or ideological overlap between Obama and Trump, so the proverbial "Obama-Trump" voter, all that spread really demonstrates is that their personal ideology went off the rails.
Re: Fox News. If this was 2009, I would actually say go for it. They were obnoxious back then, but at least they weren't nakedly propagandist.
Edited by CrimsonZephyr on Apr 20th 2019 at 12:03:19 PM
"For all those whose cares have been our concern, the work goes on, the cause endures, the hope still lives, and the dream shall never die."Rhetoric wise, actually, I strongly disagree.
Obama and Trump both strongly tapped into the statement the Establishment TM was corrupt and they could make dramatic change.
"CHANGE" was literally Obama's slogan.
Author of The Rules of Supervillainy, Cthulhu Armageddon, and United States of Monsters.Voting for Obama first and then Trump doesn't necessarily imply their views radically changed.
A lot of people are not very well-informed and are open to voting for "either candidate" depending on a variety of factors, a big one being personal charisma. I'm fairly certain Obama's likability played a big part in getting people to vote for him. It's not really about his actual policies, so much as how he sounds.
And while Donald is a rancid person, he does have a sleazy "car salesman" type of magnetism that lets him con people.
It is impossible to delegitimize FOX News. Let me repeat, just to be clear: it is IMPOSSIBLE to delegitimize FOX News. Delegitimizing FOX News is impossible. It is a strategy destined to fail. It will not work. It is an impossible task.
FOX News is one of the biggest news organizations in America, trying to "delegitimize" them would be like trying to delegitimize Paramount as a movie studio, or like delegitimizing LEGO as a toy company. It is a doomed tactic, right from the start, and you'd be better off giving up and changing strategies.
You cannot defeat one of the titans of an industry by putting your fingers in your ears and going "La la la, I'm not listening! I can't hear you, you don't exist". The very idea is patently absurd and worthy of ridicule. Stop saying we should "delegitimize FOX News", what you're suggesting is an impossible and childish fantasy.
![]()
![]()
Obama 2008, maybe, but not Obama 2012. The 2012 campaign was about defending an agenda. I can sort of understanding a Obama 2008 and Trump spread being a long term rejection of neoconservatism (even if Trump has been doing neocon Mad Libs lately, but going from a 2012 Obama vote, where he's the establishment and a vote for him is a vote to maintain his achievements, to Trump, whose sole purpose is to tear that down, is a demonstration of significant ideological shift in the individual, though not in the demographic.
Fair enough, but Democratic candidates still shouldn't be going on their programming. That's enemy territory.
Edited by CrimsonZephyr on Apr 20th 2019 at 1:28:42 PM
"For all those whose cares have been our concern, the work goes on, the cause endures, the hope still lives, and the dream shall never die."![]()
Except we're finally seeing some pushback against FOX's blatant political agenda. See the bit about advertisers starting to pull out and what not.
So doing anything to weaken this pushback when it's barely started? Not the best idea.
And nobody is pretending FOX News doesn't exist. The DNC at least just refuses to pretend that FOX News is anything but a propaganda network that favors Trump.
Edited by M84 on Apr 21st 2019 at 1:30:51 AM
Disgusted, but not surprised![]()
Yup. My intentionally intellectually-challenged point stands. Heck, I even deliberately went for "Feux" after an accident, since I found it hilarious that I got a CFS typo right there that was close to something funnier.
They're even worse for fact checking, after all.
Which is why I found it hilarious. Call it what it is: firebrand propaganda.
Edited by Euodiachloris on Apr 21st 2019 at 9:00:21 AM
A whole load of media died out once delegitimised and marginalised. So anyone claiming that "it's too big to die" is making a mistake assuming it can't.
Faux News can be ground out, and it should be ground out. Or at the very least, made absolutely clear that it's a propaganda bulletin like Putin's Russia Today or the CCP's Global Times, and therefore about as trustworthy as a snake-oil salesman.
I hold the secrets of the machine.GOP state legislator offered background checks on political enemies: report
. Apparently there were also suggestions that violence be applied, and not for the first time in this lawmaker's career.
State legislatures and local councils are generally cesspools — small voting bases, a generally narrow policy focus, and limited media coverage means a lot of these people spend years in government without ever being exposed. Also, because of a heavy suburban focus, you'll have a lot of NIMB Yism over regional projects like housing and transportation.
Edited by CrimsonZephyr on Apr 21st 2019 at 10:51:30 AM
"For all those whose cares have been our concern, the work goes on, the cause endures, the hope still lives, and the dream shall never die."

Do you think it was possible that it mostly just personal charisma? It'd explain why they voted for Clinton.