Nov 2023 Mod notice:
There may be other, more specific, threads about some aspects of US politics, but this one tends to act as a hub for all sorts of related news and information, so it's usually one of the busiest OTC threads.
If you're new to OTC, it's worth reading the Introduction to On-Topic Conversations
and the On-Topic Conversations debate guidelines
before posting here.
Rumor-based, fear-mongering and/or inflammatory statements that damage the quality of the thread will be thumped. Off-topic posts will also be thumped. Repeat offenders may be suspended.
If time spent moderating this thread remains a distraction from moderation of the wiki itself, the thread will need to be locked. We want to avoid that, so please follow the forum rules
when posting here.
In line with the general forum rules, 'gravedancing' is prohibited here. If you're celebrating someone's death or hoping that they die, your post will get thumped. This rule applies regardless of what the person you're discussing has said or done.
Edited by Mrph1 on Nov 30th 2023 at 11:03:59 AM
I haven't written them off, with the exception of Biden I guess. Because we really don't need another President with a bad history when it comes to sexual harassment.
I just won't be ecstatic and popping champagne if any of them do become the candidate.
I'm still perfectly willing to vote for any of them come Election Day. Because any of them would be better than Trump.
Edited by M84 on Apr 17th 2019 at 12:02:35 AM
Disgusted, but not surprisedI was raised conservative, as in my dad listened to Rush Limbaugh, I read an Ann Coulter book in high school on purpose, I’m pretty sure I voted for Mc Cain when I was 18, and I didn’t slowly shift until college.
I didn’t start hating Wall Street until, hmm... 3-5 years ago? For reference, I’m 29.
Edited by wisewillow on Apr 16th 2019 at 9:04:25 AM
Uh, are we doing preferred candidates? Warren tops my list, not because I think she's perfect or even great but because she clears most of the low hanging bars I have for what I'd like candidates to do (i.e. she can apologize and seems to at least acknowledge social justice issues, something that should be standard but apparently isn't). It gets murkier past that. Issue is, candidates like Andrew Gillium or Stacy Abrams aren't running so I can't nominate them, otherwise they'd probably be next.
Buttgieg, Biden, and finally Gabbard are my bottom three candidates right now.
x3 Essentially that.
Edited by AzurePaladin on Apr 16th 2019 at 12:03:55 PM
The awful things he says and does are burned into our cultural consciousness like a CRT display left on the same picture too long. -FighteerI feel similarly on Warren - she’s not perfect, but I think she’s the best we’ve got.
Oh God! Natural light!![]()
As you’ve made clear, and I still think you need to let that go.
Edited by KarkatTheDalek on Apr 16th 2019 at 12:05:22 PM
Oh God! Natural light!
x4 I could have sworn that I've said this, but it really doesn't matter anymore to most people I've seen. Not to mention that she walked it back very quickly, so she recognized a mistake early on without digging herself deeper.
Edited by AzurePaladin on Apr 16th 2019 at 12:05:48 PM
The awful things he says and does are burned into our cultural consciousness like a CRT display left on the same picture too long. -FighteerBeing honest, my only real criteria at this point are "competent and capable of unseating Trump".
Having the most progressive candidate in the world doesn't mean jack if they can't get elected in the first place, and a moderate candidate who can do the job is still going to be an improvement, even if not as much as a more progressive candidate might be. This isn't a special election where coming close to winning is good enough. 2020 is what all that momentum has been for.
Edited by sgamer82 on Apr 16th 2019 at 10:07:30 AM
![]()
What bothers me is that people here have tried to pretend it didn't happen at all. We had someone here try to claim it didn't happen, and I had to post a vid of her saying it to prove otherwise.
Saying it's not a big deal is one thing. Trying to pretend it didn't happen? That's another thing entirely.
In that case the question is more "Who is the most electable candidate?" rather than who is the "best" candidate.
In that case, I'd probably have to go with Sanders or Biden. I don't like either of them, but it's probably going to be one of them who wins the primaries.
Edited by M84 on Apr 17th 2019 at 12:09:42 AM
Disgusted, but not surprisedFor me, I've always kind of taken as a given that people in position to be elected President are more likely than not to have some black marks against them.
Not to say it isn't better that they don't, or it's wrong to have personal lines, but I imagine that's why most of the things people reasonably take issues with all of the candidates haven't actually affected me that much.
I guess if I were making preferences right now it would be Warren, and then either Harris or Gillibrand.
x3 Cool. I recognize that it happened. On the list of things to worry about in a candidate though, with sexual harassment, mistreatment of staffers, legit dictator apologia, and egos the size of Manhattan clashing, and even her own...issues (to put it somewhat mildly) with Native American issues, if someone briefly lashed out against a system thought fairly widely at the time to be unfair it is nowhere near the top of my list of priorities, nor even really a factor at all. Materially, it does not affect her as a candidate.
Edited by AzurePaladin on Apr 16th 2019 at 12:11:59 PM
The awful things he says and does are burned into our cultural consciousness like a CRT display left on the same picture too long. -FighteerI don't imagine it mattering that much, I guess, which is good if Warren becomes the candidate since Donald is just going to keep bringing it up ad nauseaum. If that's the worst he can do, all the better. At least she's someone the democratic base will probably rally around and be excited for, which is desperately something that's needed right now.
I will say that I’m warming up on Sanders somewhat. He wouldn’t be my first choice, and it’s not like I don’t have issues with him, but I don’t think I’d mind voting for him if it came to it.
Oh God! Natural light!I don't fully understand what "Wall Street" as a political force means, to be honest. Like, I know it's a physical location where the stock market lives. But when people say "Cozying up to Wall Street" or "Trying to take on Wall Street", I get a bit lost.
Like. If we're "taking on Wall Street", are we talking about fighting corporations generically?
Fighting shareholders and the publicly-traded economic philosophy?
Dismantling the stock market itself?
My Tumblr. Currently side-by-side liveblogging Digimon Adventure, sub vs dub.![]()
At best it's acknowledging the need for regulation (and better enforcement of said regulation) of the financial industry. To prevent the systemic problems that culminated in things like the 2008 banking crisis.
At worst it's anti-elite populist rhetoric.
Warren leans more towards the former, though she has at times edged a bit too close to the latter for my comfort. Which is in part why her "DNC rigged primaries" crap bothered me — it also reeked of anti-elite populism.
Same here. Sanders at least doesn't have a known track record of groping women.
Edited by M84 on Apr 17th 2019 at 12:26:52 AM
Disgusted, but not surprised

I think you just kinda wrote off all the front runners, M84. The only candidates that come to mind left are Booker, Klobacher, Hickenlooper, and Inslee.
The former two have been constantly criticized in this thread while the latter two haven't risen up enough for anyone here to want to tear down.