Nov 2023 Mod notice:
There may be other, more specific, threads about some aspects of US politics, but this one tends to act as a hub for all sorts of related news and information, so it's usually one of the busiest OTC threads.
If you're new to OTC, it's worth reading the Introduction to On-Topic Conversations
and the On-Topic Conversations debate guidelines
before posting here.
Rumor-based, fear-mongering and/or inflammatory statements that damage the quality of the thread will be thumped. Off-topic posts will also be thumped. Repeat offenders may be suspended.
If time spent moderating this thread remains a distraction from moderation of the wiki itself, the thread will need to be locked. We want to avoid that, so please follow the forum rules
when posting here.
In line with the general forum rules, 'gravedancing' is prohibited here. If you're celebrating someone's death or hoping that they die, your post will get thumped. This rule applies regardless of what the person you're discussing has said or done.
Edited by Mrph1 on Nov 30th 2023 at 11:03:59 AM
Not Trump and not Biden has a lot to say for it.
Beto's biggest appeal is the relative lack of horrible past votes and policies so many other candidates are saddled with.
Edited by CharlesPhipps on Mar 15th 2019 at 11:15:19 AM
Author of The Rules of Supervillainy, Cthulhu Armageddon, and United States of Monsters.
Which also means that he's got no established platform, which is a bit discouraging.
And in international news, the manifesto that (allegedly) was written by the shooter contains this little tidbit
: "Were/are you a supporter of Donald Trump?" the author of the manifesto wrote. "As a symbol of renewed white identity and common purpose? Sure. As a policy maker and leader? Dear god no."
Even Beggars Won't Choose It in action? And apologies if it was too soon to make that kind of joke, but the nigh-constant shootings in the US have made me develop a bleak sense of humor with shit like this.
Edited by ironballs16 on Mar 15th 2019 at 2:25:19 PM
"Why would I inflict myself on somebody else?"What votes? He's not a house representative anymore. By the way, fully agree with Fourthspartan, he doesn't have the policies, also being deliberately vague on details when announcing his run, nor the experience I'd be comfortable with.
Life is unfair...![]()
That's what I find is a genuine problem, because even I don't think he actually has zero policy positions.
But it's not just that I don't hear people talking about his policies, but I don't hear people talking about people talking about his policies.
All the coverage I've seen has been about his star-power, charisma, appeal, etc. All those personal attributes that make him so eminently runnable. Plus the teasing, gossip, ''will he/won't he?" speculation and all that nonsense. It's all branding and no substance, which has been completely absent from the discussion.
I'm sure he's a decent human being - which is indeed more than you can say about the country's current leadership - but I just don't think that's enough. More concerning, much like Booker, is if his particular "appeal" and "reach across the aisle" attitude is used to enable non-progressive policies.
In a sense Beto is a lot like candidate Obama, hence I suppose why a lot of the Obama people are backing him.
He's not as scandal free as Obama however, given he had a DWI arrest, which is something Trump could actually hold against him without being a hypocrite, not that it would stop him.
Edited by CaptainCapsase on Mar 15th 2019 at 2:30:22 PM
I'll give Beto the benefit of the doubt for now and hope he does come out with some concrete policies soon.
My family is originally from El Paso, and seeing him come out so strongly against the wall and defend the value of immigrants was really heartening. Now, that's something every candidate has done, but him being right there on the scene, living and talking with people in the city struck a cord with a lot of Hispanics.
Firstly, not Trump is such a low standard to have that I'm not going to even dignify that with a serious rebuttal.
Secondly, he has no bad things in his record because he has no record. He's a vacuous empty suit who stands for nothing and believes thing.
He's not as scandal free as Obama however, given he had a DWI arrest, which is something Trump could actually hold against him without being a hypocrite, not that it would stop him.
He's like Obama in the most superficial manner possible, he has Obama's confidence and quite literally nothing else. Intellectually and policy wise O'Rourke is nothing like Obama, if anything his vacuous slogans and constant flip flopping is almost Trumpian.
Edited by Fourthspartan56 on Mar 15th 2019 at 11:49:31 AM
"Einstein would turn over in his grave. Not only does God play dice, the dice are loaded." -Chairman Sheng-Ji YangWhich is why I said candidate Obama, who out of necessity didn't emphasize the wonkish stuff, and was still a relative unknown.
Trump actually has a history of really hating people who drive under the influence (or at least, seeming to for cameras, he fired a Kardashian or something for it on Celebrity Apprentice). Kind of weird he'd choose to instead nitpick hand gestures, but then nothing the Orange ever does makes much sense.
Oissu!"He's better then Trump" is an argument tailor made for General Elections, the fact anyone is seriously making it before the actual primary has begun is utterly baffling.
I was exaggerating slightly, there are no serious flaws or controversies because he has never stood for anything.
Edited by Fourthspartan56 on Mar 15th 2019 at 11:51:58 AM
"Einstein would turn over in his grave. Not only does God play dice, the dice are loaded." -Chairman Sheng-Ji YangTrump's dislike of alcoholism is one of his few redeeming qualities.
Mind you, he's well known to regularly use cocaine.
And almost certainly still does.
Edited by CharlesPhipps on Mar 15th 2019 at 11:53:22 AM
Author of The Rules of Supervillainy, Cthulhu Armageddon, and United States of Monsters.Huh, Trump has a redeeming quality? I have slightly more respect for him now. I mean, it doesn't change my overall low opinion of him, but it's something.
Leviticus 19:34This is just baffling.
It's impossible to be non-ideological, anyone who has an opinion about policies or holds any social or economic position are by definition ideological. If one thinks they aren't then they're just embracing the status-quo's ideology, whatever it may be.
Furthermore considering that we're a democracy and thus the desires of the electorate determine leadership I cannot imagine why anyone would think a "boring functionary" would be a good choice. I love politics and policies so much that I've chosen Political Science as my degree, but even I think the idea that some boring wonk is a good choice is ridiculous. We should want a person who can win (i.e. non boring) who also has good strong policy.
Edited by Fourthspartan56 on Mar 15th 2019 at 12:01:53 PM
"Einstein would turn over in his grave. Not only does God play dice, the dice are loaded." -Chairman Sheng-Ji Yang

I'd ask you what position or policy of his you like but that would be cruel, they obviously don't exist.
"Einstein would turn over in his grave. Not only does God play dice, the dice are loaded." -Chairman Sheng-Ji Yang