Nov 2023 Mod notice:
There may be other, more specific, threads about some aspects of US politics, but this one tends to act as a hub for all sorts of related news and information, so it's usually one of the busiest OTC threads.
If you're new to OTC, it's worth reading the Introduction to On-Topic Conversations
and the On-Topic Conversations debate guidelines
before posting here.
Rumor-based, fear-mongering and/or inflammatory statements that damage the quality of the thread will be thumped. Off-topic posts will also be thumped. Repeat offenders may be suspended.
If time spent moderating this thread remains a distraction from moderation of the wiki itself, the thread will need to be locked. We want to avoid that, so please follow the forum rules
when posting here.
In line with the general forum rules, 'gravedancing' is prohibited here. If you're celebrating someone's death or hoping that they die, your post will get thumped. This rule applies regardless of what the person you're discussing has said or done.
Edited by Mrph1 on Nov 30th 2023 at 11:03:59 AM
Which is one reason I don't usually link op-eds here. And even though non-biased sources don't really exist for the most part...Current Affairs is very biased.
I do occasionally link op-eds. Usually progressive ones that go easy on the emotionally charged language such as Paul Krugman's editorials.
Edited by M84 on Mar 14th 2019 at 6:08:54 PM
Disgusted, but not surprisedTY Ts and odd one. When criticizing republicans they’re dead on and pointing out that a lot of centrists are willing to compromise they’re accurate. But then they have idiots like jimmy dore.
Yes the give trump the wall for dreamers was asinine. But in practice Dems have been bending over for decades. Glass Steagel repeal? Those awful crime bills? Don’t ask don’t tell? Wall Street deregulation? All done with support from the dems
Edited by LordYAM on Mar 14th 2019 at 3:09:18 AM
![]()
What do you mean by that? That they consistently put out articles of the same political leaning, or that that political leaning is consistently one you disagree with? Or both?
I tend towards Sam Seder rather than TYT for that reason. Dore has no idea what he's yapping about.
Edited by GoldenKaos on Mar 14th 2019 at 10:11:04 AM
"...in the end the Shadow was only a small and passing thing: there was light and high beauty for ever beyond its reach."You seem to consistently advocate neoliberal and centrist positions, and that if something is said in a mean way it should be ignored.
Hell here’s an article on joe Biden. Whatever ones opinion the points it raises about his record are worth considering.
https://harpers.org/archive/2019/03/joe-biden-record/
Same with Kamela
![]()
And when did I say I was a supporter of either?
I have no love for Biden. And the more I learn about Kamala Harris the less convinced I am of voting for her in the primaries.
If the source acts more like that one angry old man who would rant on a soapbox at the college campus' quad during my college days, I'm going to take the source as seriously as I did that old man's rants. Which is to say not at all.
Edited by M84 on Mar 14th 2019 at 6:19:44 PM
Disgusted, but not surprised
Okay, now you're getting into personal attacks here. I've refrained from actually making personal insults towards you so far. The least you could do is do the same.
All I've done so far is call the sources you linked biased and not the most reliable. I haven't said anything about you personally.
Edited by M84 on Mar 14th 2019 at 6:32:57 PM
Disgusted, but not surprisedI was pointing out a bit of hypocrisy on your part. I linked an article showing Kamela’s shitty record almost a year ago but you dismissed it because it was from the jacobin. You also pulled the “it was Jerry brown’s fault” when in fact she did have the chance to do the right thing in the Cooper case and sat on it until she got called out on it. If Cooper is cleared I will totally bring it up every time someone stumps for her.
It’s sort of vindicating in a way
And in cases like Israel it’s right to show anger.
Edited by LordYAM on Mar 14th 2019 at 3:36:52 AM
That's an awfully long time to hold a grudge over someone not approving of an article you linked. And the Jacobin is a biased and unreliable source. Keep in mind that we generally don't even take Huffington Post or Daily Kos material here very seriously, and those are way less biased.
Edited by M84 on Mar 14th 2019 at 6:40:10 PM
Disgusted, but not surprised
I changed my opinion once more evidence became more publicly known. That's all. And even back then I wasn't a particularly huge fan of Kamala Harris in the first place. Which is what made it easier for me to change my opinion. I went from "ambivalent but supportive" to "ambivalent but not my first choice".
It's hardly hypocrisy. I was simply willing to change my mind.
Edited by M84 on Mar 14th 2019 at 6:47:23 PM
Disgusted, but not surprisedFair enough but I’m not happy about being dismissed as a sexist Bernie bro back when I pointed this shit out (and it was available back then. I cited how a lot of people were turned off by her lack of action in the Cooper case and You pulled the “it was Jerry brown’s fault” on me.)
I don’t like being accused of slander and when Ambar did that you didn’t exactly offer help.
Edited by LordYAM on Mar 14th 2019 at 3:49:25 AM
I'd suggest not bringing up a poster who no longer regularly posts here as part of your argument, given that they are not able to respond. For all you know, maybe Ambar has also changed their mind on this issue.
But I digress. We're not supposed to discuss other posters in these threads.
Moving on...
Donald Trump follows lead of other nations and grounds Boeing 737 Max planes
I gotta admit...this isn't an entirely bad move on Trump's part. There's definitely something wrong with these planes. Two crashes within four or five months? That's not normal.
And even this move was only due to Trump caving in to growing pressure.
I suppose it shows that even lobbying power has its limits.
Edited by M84 on Mar 14th 2019 at 7:08:41 PM
Disgusted, but not surprisedI'll be honest, I see nothing wrong with this. Fringe leftist publications and figures can say anything they want, up to and including defending dictators and authoritarian governments while viciously bashing Western governments in general and anyone they perceive as even slightly to the right of their positions, which frequently means "not being Bernie".
So when it comes to topics like what to believe regarding potential 2020 Democratic nominees, taking Kamala Harris's unfortunate prosecution record as an example, I sure as hell would trust a more mainstream publication reporting the same thing than Jacobin or whatever, since as far as I'm concerned their track record has made me write them off, much like a Crying Wolf situation.
Mainstream media has problems, but holy crap am I glad for the "filter" they apply at times.
Don't Shoot the Message is a trope for a reason: communication isn't just about what you say, how you say it is just as important.
Yes, a lot of Kamala's support early on was due to her great media presence. But that's the purpose of the primaries to be able to look at the records of candidates and see what the truth is versus the rhetoric.
Even so, I'd probably vote for her over Biden.
Author of The Rules of Supervillainy, Cthulhu Armageddon, and United States of Monsters.Trump and co are bracing for as many as 14 GOP Senators to break ranks and vote against his Fake Emergency.
https://www.cnn.com/politics/live-news/senate-vote-trump-national-emergency/index.html
Senate votes to end US support for Saudi-led Yemen conflict
.
Sorry if this has been posted here before.

Yes, and so is Current Affairs magazine.
Disgusted, but not surprised