Nov 2023 Mod notice:
There may be other, more specific, threads about some aspects of US politics, but this one tends to act as a hub for all sorts of related news and information, so it's usually one of the busiest OTC threads.
If you're new to OTC, it's worth reading the Introduction to On-Topic Conversations
and the On-Topic Conversations debate guidelines
before posting here.
Rumor-based, fear-mongering and/or inflammatory statements that damage the quality of the thread will be thumped. Off-topic posts will also be thumped. Repeat offenders may be suspended.
If time spent moderating this thread remains a distraction from moderation of the wiki itself, the thread will need to be locked. We want to avoid that, so please follow the forum rules
when posting here.
In line with the general forum rules, 'gravedancing' is prohibited here. If you're celebrating someone's death or hoping that they die, your post will get thumped. This rule applies regardless of what the person you're discussing has said or done.
Edited by Mrph1 on Nov 30th 2023 at 11:03:59 AM
x4 Well, if democracy puts an authoritarian dickhead who says stuff like "democracy only exists when the military allows it" and goes around posting videos of people doing golden showers on his Twitter in power, then something is very wrong with it.
And before you ask, no, I didn't make any of that up.
He also gave the Ministry of Agriculture the power to decide upon the rights of indiginous people and has (against the constitution, mind) restarted efforts to reintegrate them back into society.
Edited by HailMuffins on Mar 9th 2019 at 11:01:30 AM
Drones are fundamentally no different than any other form of delivery system. In practical terms, there is no difference between a drone strike or an airstrike or a missile strike.
If you have a special objection to drones, it’s not because of how easy or hard they make things. It’s probably because they just feel a lot worse than a conventional strike.
They should have sent a poet.Oh yes, he's certainly worse than Donald. Mind you that isn't something that I'm saying lightly, since it's not my intention to downplay or make light of just how awful and inhumane the Trump administration is.
It's just that Bolsonaro really is that bad. What makes it sting even more is that we don't have anything like the electoral college. The majority of the country really did vote for him. (Though that's not to say it was all fair play, given that his campaign was involved in paying for agencies to bombard whatsapp groups with fake news, breaking campaign finance laws).
Part of the problem is that also we have a far worse history with authoritarianism than the US; we were in a military dictatorship (backed by the CIA, I might add) only 3 decades ago, so that's part of why he feels emboldened to do things like that.
Edited by Draghinazzo on Mar 9th 2019 at 9:56:39 AM
And before you ask, no, I didn't make any of that up.
Oh definitely, but that isn't a disgrace of democracy, it is a fundamental flaw of it.
These kinds of people being elected isn't the first time, and sadly it wont be the least.
Oh, is that where this started? The Daily Show's actually doing a segment on Obama's Presidency scandals.
I totally understand how you feel, still, on the bright side Hillary was in a similar position in 2008 and she still lost. Sanders has the advantage of name recognition right now but once the primary begins we'll see how he fares without the #NeverHillary vote
.
I like Sanders, though I dont think I will be voting for him in the election.
The reason why I listed drone strikes as an Obama Admin problem is because the issue was never technological, nor even the CIA going rogue. Drones were given to the CIA specifically because they were less accountable to the public than the military is, in other words, the White House encouraged the CIA to kill more people, but didn't want to have to own up to it. That's a political issue, and Obama was just as responsible for it during his tenure as Bush was during his.
Edited by DeMarquis on Mar 9th 2019 at 9:27:21 AM
I'm done trying to sound smart. "Clear" is the new smart.Not to bring this subject back to Brazil again for too long since it's not strictly on-topic but what I find frustrating is that this narrative of Sanders being the most left-wing and best candidate has been seeping down to left-leaning circles down here too. There were even people gassing Ojeda back before he decided he wasn't going to be in the race.
~Charles Phipps ([1]
):
Edited by MarqFJA on Mar 9th 2019 at 6:06:33 PM
Fiat iustitia, et pereat mundus.As much as I want a milestone as well, I think the primary concern here will be who is the best person to undo all of Trump's damage to the United States first as well as the policies that will put America on a restorative track.
I think Bernie can do that even if he's my second choice after Warren at this juncture.
I also prefer him to Biden, who I was afraid would win the primary lead.
Edited by CharlesPhipps on Mar 9th 2019 at 7:12:21 AM
Author of The Rules of Supervillainy, Cthulhu Armageddon, and United States of Monsters.I think Bernie can do that even if he's my second choice after Warren at this juncture.
I also prefer him to Biden, who I was afraid would win the primary lead.
My problem with electability arguments is that they're pretty much universally used against minorities and women, now I want to emphasize that I'm not accusing you of such intentions but it's common enough that I'm going to assume until proven otherwise that anyone able to beat the primary is plausibly able to beat Trump.
Obviously, if some disqualifier comes up then I'll consider electability but right now I don't see any reason to believe that Harris, Gillibrand, Warren, or Booker are unable to hypothetically beat Trump.
"Einstein would turn over in his grave. Not only does God play dice, the dice are loaded." -Chairman Sheng-Ji Yang

My basic argument against drones is they make it far too easy to target and murder people while the government shrugs off their use for that purpose, even though they're not nearly as effective or precise as people claim they are.
The real issue is their indiscriminate use by the CIA and other parties but regulating drones would be great.
I also would love a lot more regulation on surveillance.
Author of The Rules of Supervillainy, Cthulhu Armageddon, and United States of Monsters.