Nov 2023 Mod notice:
There may be other, more specific, threads about some aspects of US politics, but this one tends to act as a hub for all sorts of related news and information, so it's usually one of the busiest OTC threads.
If you're new to OTC, it's worth reading the Introduction to On-Topic Conversations
and the On-Topic Conversations debate guidelines
before posting here.
Rumor-based, fear-mongering and/or inflammatory statements that damage the quality of the thread will be thumped. Off-topic posts will also be thumped. Repeat offenders may be suspended.
If time spent moderating this thread remains a distraction from moderation of the wiki itself, the thread will need to be locked. We want to avoid that, so please follow the forum rules
when posting here.
In line with the general forum rules, 'gravedancing' is prohibited here. If you're celebrating someone's death or hoping that they die, your post will get thumped. This rule applies regardless of what the person you're discussing has said or done.
Edited by Mrph1 on Nov 30th 2023 at 11:03:59 AM
Axios: Most Democrats see Republicans as racist, sexist
Why it matters: If Americans are this convinced that the other side isn't just wrong, but dumb and evil, they'll never be able to find enough common ground to solve real problems. And they're more likely to elect leaders who can't do it, either.
...
21% of Democrats think Republicans are evil, and about the same share of Republicans (23%) think Democrats are evil.
...
The bottom line: Both parties are being redefined around the extreme emotions shaping extremely ugly views of each other. That means that, as the midterm elections proved, there's less room for moderates or centrists in the current political environment — a dynamic that's likely to get worse before it gets better.
![]()
Definitely falls under You Keep Using That Word - moreso than usual!
And reposting the page-bottomer since I'd like to see the views on this. It may be Israeli politics, but it plays a factor in Ilhan Omar's recent controversy. Israel's Central Election Committee has given the go-ahead to far-right Jewish candidates to run while disqualifying the entry of an Arab party
that Netanyahu accused of supporting terrorism. Emphasis added.
Facing a corruption case and a merger of centrist parties that could defeat him, the conservative Netanyahu has allied with an ultra-nationalist list that includes the Jewish Power party to boost his chances.
The elections committee, made up of members of the outgoing parliament, struck down motions that had sought to bar as racist Jewish Power’s Michael Ben-Ari and Itamar Ben-Gvir, who are adherents of late anti-Arab rabbi Meir Kahane.
Left-wing party Meretz said it would appeal, along with center-left Labour, to the Supreme Court against the decision to let the Jewish Power candidates stand.
The committee also voted 17-10 to bar the joint Arab party Raam-Balad from the election in accordance with a motion filed by Netanyahu’s ruling Likud party. Likud says the Balad faction wants to eliminate Israel as a Jewish state and backs Palestinian and Lebanese militants.
Raam-Balad, a mix of Islamist and Arab nationalists, describes itself as a democratic movement opposed to Israel’s occupation of Palestinian territory.
“We have a fierce argument with Zionism,” Mansour Abbas, who heads the Raam faction, told Reuters.
Raam-Balad now holds eight of parliament’s 120 seats. Candidates of other parties representing Israel’s 20 percent Arab minority remain eligible to run.
Edited by ironballs16 on Mar 7th 2019 at 2:21:35 PM
"Why would I inflict myself on somebody else?"Soban, are you just here to prove a point that Democrats are equivalent to Republicans? Both-siderism is part of the problem with our system, and emphasizing it isn't helping.
Calling a pig a pig isn't racist. Calling a Republican who votes for racist policies a racist isn't an ad hominem attack; it's a demonstrable fact.
"It's Occam's Shuriken! If the answer is elusive, never rule out ninjas!"I repeat my prior point: these articles implying that common ground needs to be found imply that "both sides" are equally valid or should at least have their ideas considered. It doesn't account for situations where one "side" has been super radicalized to the point they have begun supporting immoral, self-destructive, and inefficient policies and attitudes. There is no "common ground" that should be found with them.
When the right stops validating white supremacy, racism, homophobia, etc then compromise can be had. Otherwise, there is no "meeting halfway".
It also doesn't help that you keep dropping these articles here without bothering to actually reply to what people are saying about them.
Edited by Draghinazzo on Mar 7th 2019 at 3:27:49 PM
Also, when the right attempts to deflect criticism with a tu quoque
attack, legitimizing that attack only worsens the problem.
Edited by Fighteer on Mar 7th 2019 at 2:28:20 PM
"It's Occam's Shuriken! If the answer is elusive, never rule out ninjas!"Related to the page topper:
Mc Connell won't allow vote on election reform bill
https://www.politico.com/story/2019/03/06/mcconnell-election-reform-bill-1207702
Republicans ripped into the House Democrats’ electoral reform bill at a news conference Wednesday, arguing that the legislation is merely a tactic to tilt elections in favor of Democrats. Mc Connell, who has dubbed the bill the “Democrat Politician Protection Act,” said that the bill is “offensive to average voters” and will not get any floor time in the Senate.
When asked at a news conference why he wasn’t bringing the House electoral reform bill to the Senate floor, Mc Connell said, with a grin, "Because I get to decide what we vote on.”
“What is the problem we’re trying to solve here?” Mc Connell asked. “People are flooding to the polls.”
Mc Connell in February, however, said he’ll bring a vote on the Green New Deal, the resolution led by freshman Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.), to challenge Democrats on the measure that Republicans say is far to the left of most Americans.
“Most Democrats see Republicans as racist and sexist” could just be read as “most Democrats understand the Republican policy platform”.
Sure, not every Republican voter is personally a massive bigot. But by supporting the Republican Party and voting their politicians into office they’re helping to enact bigoted agendas, so it’s really a distinction without a difference. “I’m not a bigot, I just like bigoted politics” doesn’t really fly.
Edited by archonspeaks on Mar 7th 2019 at 11:30:15 AM
They should have sent a poet."I'm not a bigot; I just think that using taxes to help minorities is a bad idea."
"I'm not a bigot; I just think that Mexican migrants are flooding the borders and taking our jobs."
"I'm not a bigot; I just think that women shouldn't star in superhero movies."
Yes, yes you are.
"It's Occam's Shuriken! If the answer is elusive, never rule out ninjas!"Fighteer, you are getting a mite overly personal there IMO...
Anyway. I can definitively see why someone would regard Republicans as evil when one of their leaders wanted to strip 22 million people of their health insurance just to cut taxes for wealthy people
and before that was trying to help the tobacco industry overturn health regulations abroad
.
I dunno what arguments might be cited by Republicans to call Democrats evil but I can imagine them...
"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard FeynmanSadly, the word “socialist†is still a very effective boogeyman for a lot of independents and moderates, especially older ones, so Republicans and people who do very well under the status quo will continue to hit that button as hard and often as they can with any policy they dislike, regardless of whether it has anything to do with socialism or not.
Another 10-15 years and maybe it won’t work anymore, whether because of right wingers crying wolf so much or because of changes in society, (for example back in 2004 Republicans whipped voters into a frenzy by adding gay marriage bans to a bunch of state constitutions, a strategy that got partial credit for getting Bush re-elected. By 2014 it wouldn’t have worked nearly as well) but for now it works and they’re going to milk it to the last drop.
For reference:
But there’s one exception: when the conversation turns to socialism — with just nine percent of independents and 13 percent of moderates viewing the term favorably in the poll. That’s compared with a plurality of indies (by 40 percent to 23 percent) and a majority of moderates (51 percent to 19 percent) viewing “capitalism” positively.
What’s more, the MOST UNPOPULAR candidate quality in the NBC/WSJ poll — more unpopular than being a Muslim or being over the age of 75 — is being a socialist, with 74 percent of independents and 74 percent of moderates either very uncomfortable or having reservations with that quality.
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/meet-the-press/how-socialism-plays-poorly-middle-electorate-n978861
Sanders makes me worry about nominating Sanders.
My Tumblr. Currently side-by-side liveblogging Digimon Adventure, sub vs dub.Agreed, although it's weird how people can be super enthusiastic about him but still regard "socialism" as a bad word. Cognitive dissonance?
"It's Occam's Shuriken! If the answer is elusive, never rule out ninjas!"Note that (at least according to discussion of this poll that I heard on the news earlier today) it’s all about branding, not actual policy. Large majorities of the country want the government to do more to help people, but if you call it socialist then brains freeze up and go straight into knee jerk panic.
Btw, I haven’t had a chance to dig into the quality of the poll due to being at work, if anyone wants to do a dive into it and give us all an idea of poll quality, I’m sure that we’d all be grateful. I certainly would be.
| Wandering, but not lost. | If people bring so much courage to this world...◊ |Yeah, I listened to another interview about that poll and they noted a lot of people turned off by "socialism" also said they liked Sanders when asked.
Then there was this one dude in Pennsylvania who voted for Trump, then voted for Democrat Conner Lamb for Congress and now says his vote is up for grabs but if he had to chose right then: "Probably Kamala."
Not sure what to make of that.
![]()
![]()
Okay, the article YOU posted shows that, while Democrats overwhelmingly think that Republicans are bigoted, Democrats also have a slightly lower rate of thinking that Republicans are evil compared to the other way around.
What the fuck does that information tell you? When about 40% of Democrats think Republicans are bigoted but not evil? What conclusion can you extrapolate from that, that happens to run exactly counter to your message? Could it be that you're wrong?
Edited by PushoverMediaCritic on Mar 7th 2019 at 1:27:58 PM
Observing one side consistently back reprehensible policies for years, and pointing that out, isn't the strawman you just constructed.
"...in the end the Shadow was only a small and passing thing: there was light and high beauty for ever beyond its reach."

McConnell suggests voting-rights proposal is ‘socialist’
Apparently automatic voter registration, and so ensuring that everyone eligible to vote is able to vote, is socialism now.
-eyeroll-
"Yup. That tasted purple."