Nov 2023 Mod notice:
There may be other, more specific, threads about some aspects of US politics, but this one tends to act as a hub for all sorts of related news and information, so it's usually one of the busiest OTC threads.
If you're new to OTC, it's worth reading the Introduction to On-Topic Conversations
and the On-Topic Conversations debate guidelines
before posting here.
Rumor-based, fear-mongering and/or inflammatory statements that damage the quality of the thread will be thumped. Off-topic posts will also be thumped. Repeat offenders may be suspended.
If time spent moderating this thread remains a distraction from moderation of the wiki itself, the thread will need to be locked. We want to avoid that, so please follow the forum rules
when posting here.
In line with the general forum rules, 'gravedancing' is prohibited here. If you're celebrating someone's death or hoping that they die, your post will get thumped. This rule applies regardless of what the person you're discussing has said or done.
Edited by Mrph1 on Nov 30th 2023 at 11:03:59 AM
Ah, okay.
Some context probably would have been appreciate, but thanks for clarifying.
Oh God! Natural light!I had the best idea ever (after Vaccines, Synthetic Fertilizers, Water Treatment, Sliced Bread, and TV Tropes):
The next presidential candidate running against Trump should have their slogan be "Hindsight is 2020"
Edited by Protagonist506 on Feb 24th 2019 at 11:35:54 AM
Leviticus 19:34As has been proposed before.
Honestly, I don't really like it - seems too gloating. I'm worried that might alienate people.
Oh God! Natural light!>With women in combat roles, a federal court rules male-only draft unconstitutional
What's been fun has been watching all the MRAs try to spin this as some sort of victory over the world-controlling evil that is feminism... Ignoring that feminists have been pushing for this for years.
"Yup. That tasted purple."My best friend in Florida compared it to the episode of Bojack Horseman regarding women and guns.
For decades women have been trying to accomplish this in liberal courts but the moment it's by people who aren't of their demographic, it succeeds.
Author of The Rules of Supervillainy, Cthulhu Armageddon, and United States of Monsters.The basic economic structure right now is unsustainable as rising populations and automation mean that more and more people are just flat out unemployable.... New jobs and wealth redistribution just delay the inevitable on that front... they don't fix it, they just kick the can down the road. Sooner or later we are just going to flat out need to face the fact that the very assumption of requiring a job to live is extremely flawed... And the longer we put that off, the more people are going to be harmed in the process of figuring it out.
The question of automation really isn’t all that relevant to the question of climate change, but since you’ve brought it up I see no way of resolving that without somekind of actual “seize the means of production” socialism. Anything else would likely be some kind of dystopia for whoever doesn’t own the robots/AI or has the really specialized labor needed to maintain them.
It's been a major Marxist critique of capitalism from the start. Automation under capitalism deprives more and more people of employment (and therefore the means of providing for themselves) as technology advances (because capitalism's chief end is profit), whereas under socialism it would just make it easier to provide for everyone.
"...in the end the Shadow was only a small and passing thing: there was light and high beauty for ever beyond its reach."Pigs will fly over frozen Hell before anyone pulls that off.
Not that I'm against it, far from it, but really, we can't even get rich people to pay proper taxes, let alone that.
![]()
![]()
I don’t think such an arrangement would work out in the long run.
If the 70s and 80s have proven anything is that all it takes is one chink in the redistribution system and Capital will do absolutely everything to destroy it, and will likely succeed without extraordinary action from workers.
Leave the means of automation in private hands is just not something we can allow if we want it to actually improve people’s lives.
If you don’t even think that is possible that you are essentially submitting to the coming cyberpunk future, at best.
Edited by Mio on Feb 25th 2019 at 9:13:13 AM
We got to here from feudalism, we can get to an automated no-work utopia at some point.
The first thing to do is to get the rich paying their taxes properly. I listened to someone call Zuckerberg, Bezos and their ilk the new "Lords and Ladies" and the current system akin to neofeudalism. Money speaks louder than votes, a lot of the time, and I think it's high time the new class of oligarchs were reminded who has the legal monopoly on force.
"...in the end the Shadow was only a small and passing thing: there was light and high beauty for ever beyond its reach."I dunno, it depends on how long you define 'foreseeable future' to be. I can certainly see socialism happening, maybe not in our lifetimes but doable within a few generations/centuries or so.
"...in the end the Shadow was only a small and passing thing: there was light and high beauty for ever beyond its reach."Well, modern capitalism is a direct descendant of the economic system developed from feudal society switching from a goods-based economy to a money-based economy, with the original goal being profit maximisation for the landowning aristocracy, and its continuation into Mercantilism.
The people it serves may have gradually shifted from the landed gentry through yeoman landlords and merchant colonisers to modern magnates, but the system has always been structured and operated primarily for the economic and political benefit of the holders of capital.
Edited by Robrecht on Feb 25th 2019 at 3:58:27 PM
Angry gets shit done.Most tech CE Os/“geniuses” come from upper middle class and upper class families too.
... you've been hearing "white people" recently? You don't say.
I almost want to see where you're going with this (as it's clearly setting something up) but that would be better for the Race and Racism thread
.
Edited by Larkmarn on Feb 25th 2019 at 11:52:50 AM
Found a Youtube Channel with political stances you want to share? Hop on over to this page and add them.I’d actually say I specific envision suburban, middle class white people, as that was the culture I was brought up in.
Oh God! Natural light!The fairly generic group, really - though not necessarily homogeneous. I mean, it accounts for everything between Jeff Bezos to blue-collar randos in the Ukraine, so it's a bit of a broad church term.
Course, I'm not American, so maybe your question wasn't aimed at me. White people are more the majority over here in the UK than in the US.
"...in the end the Shadow was only a small and passing thing: there was light and high beauty for ever beyond its reach."

I'm just going to throw out that I think that Democrats should make advancing worker's rights a part of their platform, and...well, charity begins at home, as they say.
Edited by sgamer82 on Feb 24th 2019 at 6:39:01 AM