Nov 2023 Mod notice:
There may be other, more specific, threads about some aspects of US politics, but this one tends to act as a hub for all sorts of related news and information, so it's usually one of the busiest OTC threads.
If you're new to OTC, it's worth reading the Introduction to On-Topic Conversations
and the On-Topic Conversations debate guidelines
before posting here.
Rumor-based, fear-mongering and/or inflammatory statements that damage the quality of the thread will be thumped. Off-topic posts will also be thumped. Repeat offenders may be suspended.
If time spent moderating this thread remains a distraction from moderation of the wiki itself, the thread will need to be locked. We want to avoid that, so please follow the forum rules
when posting here.
In line with the general forum rules, 'gravedancing' is prohibited here. If you're celebrating someone's death or hoping that they die, your post will get thumped. This rule applies regardless of what the person you're discussing has said or done.
Edited by Mrph1 on Nov 30th 2023 at 11:03:59 AM
Quite, the most I could see it benefiting him would be a slight boost of his ratings before he happily rolls into our next crisis.
No way it will last until the election.
We have to stay and see this through, not leave them at the mercy of the Taliban.
Agreed.
Edited by Fourthspartan56 on Jan 28th 2019 at 3:52:44 PM
"Einstein would turn over in his grave. Not only does God play dice, the dice are loaded." -Chairman Sheng-Ji YangI want the Afghan war to be over. It's a complete waste of our resources, and the idea that we're fighting for democracy and self-determination seems to be a fool's errand. We clearly aren't willing to spend the amount of money and lives that we'd need to truly make a difference, so at this point it's just a holding pattern. Better to rip the band-aid off if we aren't going to make a real commitment.
It is a violation of protocol to fly the U.S. flag upside down. Therefore, using an upside-down flag as an avatar is a form of protest against the current administration — or, more specifically, against the election itself, which was blatantly undemocratic.
That's part of the problem: it has not noticeably diminished their political or cultural influence.
Edited by Fighteer on Jan 28th 2019 at 4:04:09 AM
"It's Occam's Shuriken! If the answer is elusive, never rule out ninjas!"An upside-down flag was originally a distress signal. It was a call for help. Doing it now is a way of showing patriotism and support for your country (like flying it right-side up is) while simultaneously saying that you think the country is in distress and don't support the current direction it's going.
Really from Jupiter, but not an alien.I know, I'm hopelessly ignorant, but I'm here to learn.
That's pretty much exactly it, the US is unwilling to properly invest the resources necessary to build a functioning society to oppose the Taliban.
It doesn't help that when Afghanistan was first started resources that should've gone to it were diverted to Iraq, the damage the Bush administration have done to interventionism is shameful.
"Einstein would turn over in his grave. Not only does God play dice, the dice are loaded." -Chairman Sheng-Ji YangThe problem is that the US has been treating its operations in Afghanistan as one and done. The assumption was that we could just go in there, kill all the “bad guys”, and leave a functioning country behind this time next year.
Obviously, holding onto an assumption like that going on almost 18 years now is a little ridiculous. The strategy on the ground has begun to turn towards the long-term partnership we need to actually be successful there, but the rhetoric from upper leadership continuously stymies that.
To “win” in Afghanistan we need to accept that we’re going to be there for a long time, and we need to start treating it as a partnership with a strategic ally rather than a one-off combat deployment.
They should have sent a poet.This flag film like in that one Tommy Lee Jones movie? In the Valley of Elah, yes?
Edited by Oruka on Jan 28th 2019 at 1:19:59 AM
![]()
Yeah, Intervensionism isn't a "Go, kick the enemy and move on", is a long process that needs a lot of effort and time in order to ensure that you don't leave the place worse.
It’s almost like killing people and destroying infrastructure just... makes more enemies...
The Marshall Plan should be the template for immediately after any sort of intervention. Legit help rebuild and make things better, locals will think you’re okay-ish. Versus half assing it and causing a ton of collateral damage that creates more terrorists.
The countries that the Marshall Plan helped out had a shared cultural paradigm with the U.S., democratic institutions to varying degrees, and were politically unified in opposing Germany. What they lacked was capital to rebuild their devastated infrastructures. The Afghanistan situation is vastly different in all respects.
"It's Occam's Shuriken! If the answer is elusive, never rule out ninjas!"It needs not only a economic change, but also a social change, right?
Watch me destroying my countryCorrect. For one thing, it never had stable institutions. For another, it has a long history of Islamic warfare, and the typical citizen still holds as much allegiance to a tribe as to a nation. There just isn't a paradigm of democratic governance: we have to build it from scratch.
Edited by Fighteer on Jan 28th 2019 at 4:38:26 AM
"It's Occam's Shuriken! If the answer is elusive, never rule out ninjas!"Yeah, I don’t think the Marshall Plan is the right model here. Frankly I don’t think anyone knows what the model here is, since almost no thought has been put into figuring out how this damn thing is actually going to work. For starters, though, we should try actually listening to Afghan partners about what they need. A national identity needs to be built from scratch there, and we’ve seen that strengthening parts of the Afghan government and military can help.
Leaving the Middle East as a mess of chaotic and failed states would be a major strategic defeat for the US and for the West as a whole. Having functional, stable governments in the region benefits everyone.
Edited by archonspeaks on Jan 28th 2019 at 1:39:31 AM
They should have sent a poet."U.S. unseals indictments against China's Huawei and CFO Wanzhou" - http://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-china-huawei-tech-charges/u-s-unseals-indictments-against-chinas-huawei-and-cfo-wanzhou-idUSKCN1PM2H5
Could this be related to those sealed indictments Mueller has going or are these something else?
![]()
![]()
And it isn't even a fully funtional one, given the many issues of Japanese society that could have being avoided if USA did something else (like punish more war criminals).
Edited by KazuyaProta on Jan 28th 2019 at 4:45:20 AM
Watch me destroying my countryBut didn't Japan had a stable goverment before WWII? From what I gather, the biggest diference in Afghan is that the region was never stable in the first place, and the political infrastructure would need to be built from scratch.
Right, didn't the US covered up the Unit 731 experiments, among other things?
Edited by HailMuffins on Jan 28th 2019 at 6:47:50 AM
![]()
![]()
I highly doubt that those indictments have anything to do with Mueller's team. The focus is on corporate espionage, not election interference.
Japan has a long history of corruption at the highest ranks of government, with corporations buying politicians and running the show, but that doesn't translate into tribal warlords conducting mass-murder campaigns. Mass murder is bad for business, after all. The situations are radically different.
Japan also has a lot of cultural and racial insularity, a long-running national inferiority complex, and other issues, but it is a highly organized and structured society with an intense work ethic.
Edited by Fighteer on Jan 28th 2019 at 4:49:07 AM
"It's Occam's Shuriken! If the answer is elusive, never rule out ninjas!"

I mean shit I don't want "peace" over there.
We have to stay and see this through, not leave them at the mercy of the Taliban.
Oh really when?