Nov 2023 Mod notice:
There may be other, more specific, threads about some aspects of US politics, but this one tends to act as a hub for all sorts of related news and information, so it's usually one of the busiest OTC threads.
If you're new to OTC, it's worth reading the Introduction to On-Topic Conversations
and the On-Topic Conversations debate guidelines
before posting here.
Rumor-based, fear-mongering and/or inflammatory statements that damage the quality of the thread will be thumped. Off-topic posts will also be thumped. Repeat offenders may be suspended.
If time spent moderating this thread remains a distraction from moderation of the wiki itself, the thread will need to be locked. We want to avoid that, so please follow the forum rules
when posting here.
In line with the general forum rules, 'gravedancing' is prohibited here. If you're celebrating someone's death or hoping that they die, your post will get thumped. This rule applies regardless of what the person you're discussing has said or done.
Edited by Mrph1 on Nov 30th 2023 at 11:03:59 AM
One where there isn't any clear frontrunner, allows for better debates. On Gillibrand, her record on women's issues is top notch, but unfortunately that seems like the only thing defining her.
Life is unfair...I’d like to get platforms from everyone (hopefully with a further left average than in 2016) and then have the crappiest/most centrist drop out by the summer/fall- then December-May can be a fun proper primary between the 2-3 best.
And so help me god, we need a progressive with some damn charisma. NOT YOU, BERNIE (go away Tulsi Gabbard not you either).
Edited by wisewillow on Jan 15th 2019 at 7:22:10 AM
I don't see why that's a bad thing on its own, Women are 50% of the population and turnout higher than Men. So that's a pretty good place to start, and it's not like she can't run on other things too (like how she was the first Senator to support banning ICE).
Edited by Fourthspartan56 on Jan 15th 2019 at 7:26:11 AM
"Einstein would turn over in his grave. Not only does God play dice, the dice are loaded." -Chairman Sheng-Ji YangWhat my ideal candidate would look like? Someone progressive, charismatic and down to earth, with no really horrible scandals in their past (and taking responsibility for past mistakes committed, like Beto did). And for the love of god, please don't be a senior citizen. If you're good, I want you healthy and around for a long time.
Edited by BearyScary on Jan 15th 2019 at 3:43:35 AM
Do not obey in advance.
I remember the story being the Moore's hometown going pretty hard for Jones specifically because they were aware of Moore's activities.
For everyone else, it seemed like White people who believed the accusations were just more likely to not vote all rather than vote for Jones, whereas the ones who still did vote for Moore were very much "it's just lies".
Of course, you also have to look into the reasons why they'd sincerely disbelieve the accusations, and I imagine those aren't pretty.
Edited by LSBK on Jan 15th 2019 at 6:53:43 AM
So, I’ve been wondering - how strong is anti-Biden sentiment among Democratic voters? He does well in polls, but those won’t necessarily mean anything this time next year.
I’d honestly prefer he didn’t win, but I’m curious how many others feel that way. My parents like him, but I feel like that might be more hometown loyalty than anything.
Oh God! Natural light!Like they supported the dreamers through not 1 but 2 shutdowns prior to this? At this point I have ZERO faith in there support of any group beyond just words.
And none of those other groups get the same kind of attention that the marches did, which is the problem. Its not exacttly the hardest thing in the world to expunge leadership, if they don't go willingly, you just cold shoulder them and make your own leadership.
Instead, yet agian the words and actions go to compelatly different places, it is "We will suport you, right up until the point that it is politically inconvenient, at which point we wont care about you either."
I will believe that when they actually start getting results in there "support" for minorities, or at the very least start actually steaming the damage, instead of backing down every time there is any kind of obstacle.
Edited by Imca on Jan 15th 2019 at 5:05:11 AM
Are you kidding me?
Don't you dare suggest that the people who rightfully withdrew their support are the ones who don't support minorities, the Women's March leadership had ties to a fucking hate group.
The fact that you don't see that as a reason to cut support is extremely unfortunate, it is not the responsibility of the DNC or anyone else to clean up the Women's March's act. If March refuses to improve (which it has not) then the only decent thing to is cut off support, and show that there are consequences for supporting prejudice.
Edited by Fourthspartan56 on Jan 15th 2019 at 8:07:34 AM
"Einstein would turn over in his grave. Not only does God play dice, the dice are loaded." -Chairman Sheng-Ji YangConversations like this always prompt me to ask how things are on the opposite end of the political spectrum. From my point of view, it seems like Evil Is One Big, Happy Family, or even a Hive Mind. But that probably isn't the case. I wonder what kind of arguments flare up between them.
ASAB: All Sponsors Are Bad.They don't even provide a replacement, or any kind of substitution, consolidation or indication that they still care. They just serverd ties to what is the most visible way of speaking out we have.
So no with there track record so far, indicates that they don't actually have support beyond lip service, to indicate that takes effort.
Agian, the actions of the leadership, are not indicative of the actions of a group as a whole, and the only "hate" so far is over hates which were a play on words over what trump did, not LGBT-phobia
Honestly? They fight even more, even history will show you that, just look at fascist regimes of the past and how much effort is spent on infighting. I don't want to know how much scarier they would be if they could actualy get along.
Edited by Imca on Jan 15th 2019 at 5:17:41 AM
Soooo, if we go back some years no one should have supported King's marches? Its not like they didn't have leadership figures that encouraged constant clashes with the police or ones that were strongly against women's rights or any thing like that.
The thing is that marches get results, there not always going to be perfect or filled entirely with outstanding individuals, but they are the best tool the civil rights playbook has, and we NEED ours more then ever with things like the supreme court having a rapist sat on it because the government lacks any basic human dignity... or the constant attacks on the rights we have worked so hard to get until this point.
Edited by Imca on Jan 15th 2019 at 5:25:36 AM
Evil is not a big happy family as the Republicans threw massive numbers of their own under the bus to cater to white supremacy.
The fiscal conservatives who actually believed have also been stunned by this turn of events.
As were those evangelicals who didn't actually care more about a white man in office than a embezzling from charities serial adulterer (as well as possible rapist).
I enjoyed this book talking about the radicalizing of the Republican party.
https://www.amazon.com/dp/B07BK9M949/ref=dp-kindle-redirect?_encoding=UTF8&btkr=1
Edited by CharlesPhipps on Jan 15th 2019 at 5:29:40 AM
Author of The Rules of Supervillainy, Cthulhu Armageddon, and United States of Monsters.

Question: what would the ideal presidential election campaign cycle look like to you?