Nov 2023 Mod notice:
There may be other, more specific, threads about some aspects of US politics, but this one tends to act as a hub for all sorts of related news and information, so it's usually one of the busiest OTC threads.
If you're new to OTC, it's worth reading the Introduction to On-Topic Conversations
and the On-Topic Conversations debate guidelines
before posting here.
Rumor-based, fear-mongering and/or inflammatory statements that damage the quality of the thread will be thumped. Off-topic posts will also be thumped. Repeat offenders may be suspended.
If time spent moderating this thread remains a distraction from moderation of the wiki itself, the thread will need to be locked. We want to avoid that, so please follow the forum rules
when posting here.
In line with the general forum rules, 'gravedancing' is prohibited here. If you're celebrating someone's death or hoping that they die, your post will get thumped. This rule applies regardless of what the person you're discussing has said or done.
Edited by Mrph1 on Nov 30th 2023 at 11:03:59 AM
X4 Cortez not knowing where she sits on the political spectrum and her deliberately misframing where she sits because it’s the only way the public will understand her, are not the same thing. I suspect that the reality is the later.
X5 We’ve all heard your position on how democracy is bad and we should be ruled by AI before, there’s no need to repeate yourself.
Edited by Silasw on Jan 10th 2019 at 4:32:28 PM
“And the Bunny nails it!” ~ Gabrael “If the UN can get through a day without everyone strangling everyone else so can we.” ~ CyranWhy someone should value democracy is a topic better suited for the General Politics thread (if at all), it has very little to do with US Politics at the moment.
You say this but I still do not believe that it means that rates of unionization cannot be expanded, this is just as compatible with more privileged people keeping their unions because they have more power and thus can fight harder against efforts to strip away collective bargaining. Which does not mean that pushing mass organized labor is a doomed affair or in any way makes the leftist who advocates for it "regressive".
"Einstein would turn over in his grave. Not only does God play dice, the dice are loaded." -Chairman Sheng-Ji YangIdeally, government would guarantee labor conditions to a sufficient standard that unionization would no longer be necessary. However, the underlying problem goes deeper than that: it's one of political power. Unions are not just economic agencies; they are political agencies. They pool the resources of people who lack the individual ability to have a say in politics. This allows them to compete with the business owners and other wealthy interests who have ready access to political power.
The clawback of worker rights across the developed world isn't a natural progression; it's a very carefully orchestrated attack.
Edited by Fighteer on Jan 10th 2019 at 11:50:34 AM
"It's Occam's Shuriken! If the answer is elusive, never rule out ninjas!"Given the sheer corruption and vile behavior on display, it dismays me that anyone wants to Tone Police the public's desire for a champion against it. Because if there's no one providing water, they'll drink the sand.
We need more angry anti-establishment-ism in the United States and politicians willing to use it who aren't going to immediately sign up with the Republicans after election.
Edited by CharlesPhipps on Jan 10th 2019 at 8:47:51 AM
Author of The Rules of Supervillainy, Cthulhu Armageddon, and United States of Monsters.
Me not being impressed by populist-like campaigning is hardly tone policing. I just so happen to care more about substance than style.
If all you want is an angry loudmouth who rants about elites for President...we've already got that.
Edited by M84 on Jan 11th 2019 at 12:50:18 AM
Disgusted, but not surprisedThere's a paradox. Populism makes for engaged voters but poor politics. Good politics tend to be boring.
Edited by Fighteer on Jan 10th 2019 at 11:51:15 AM
"It's Occam's Shuriken! If the answer is elusive, never rule out ninjas!"This is why I don't like anti-establishment sentiment, it too often breeds #bothsidism and ignoring the accomplishments of the left-leaning establishment.
The corruption on display is entirely amongst the Republicans and by treating it as a universal Establishment problem you tar the people who have and continue to fight against it.
Which is exactly why we see some progressives treating Tulsi Gabbard as a decent person and Nancy Pelosi as the devil. The former stands against the establishment (in words) so she must be good while the latter is part of the establishment and must be evil.
There's rarely been a politician actually for the people who was elected by the people (and throwing out "of the people" as an irrelevancy).
I'm in awe, you literally perfectly embodied my point.
Edited by Fourthspartan56 on Jan 10th 2019 at 11:56:26 AM
"Einstein would turn over in his grave. Not only does God play dice, the dice are loaded." -Chairman Sheng-Ji YangThe ultimate flaw of democracy may be that people are collectively too ignorant and gullible to elect leaders that will actually do a good job of governing them. That said, we can at least make attempts to fix this problem. The worst sin of the Republican Party is that it actively works to promote ignorance and gullibility in the voting populace. That is what gives us "leaders" like Donald Trump.
Edited by Fighteer on Jan 10th 2019 at 12:19:41 PM
"It's Occam's Shuriken! If the answer is elusive, never rule out ninjas!"
Which is literally part of the reason that a lot of people tend to be Ignorant and gullible. Poor education, poor media, and the natural human instinct of cooperation through hating something else really hard leads to ignorance, stupidity and bigotry.
![]()
![]()
I said that gullible, ignorant people are the ultimate flaw in democracy. Therefore, if we want democracy to work, we need to educate and train people to be good voters. One party is currently attempting to do the opposite of that.
One can gain knowledge outside of formal education. The uneducated working class have learnt who cares about them the hard way, it’s the uneducated middle class who keep voting for the right wing.
“And the Bunny nails it!” ~ Gabrael “If the UN can get through a day without everyone strangling everyone else so can we.” ~ CyranLooks like Mueller interviewed one of Trump's pollsters 11 months ago, confirming that he is looking into the sharing of polling data to Russia intel assets by Manafort.
https://www.cnn.com/2019/01/10/politics/robert-mueller-trump-pollster/index.html
@NoName999 Populism is by its very nature majoritarian, pitting the majority against a minority, so it's unsurprising that it finds little support among people who fall outside of the United States' ethnic majority, since they're the ones Trump uses as his scapegoat. The demagogue that captures the imagination of such demographics will instead echo the more extreme (and rightfully controversial) thought leaders of the Civil Rights era like Kwame Ture and others like him known for their flirtations with black ethno-nationalism and separatism.
Should the post-Trump left fail to deliver on its ambitious promises to unify economic and social justice causes, is quite likely that working class minorities will begin to turn to such radicals; even now membership in what were formerly all but defunct black nationalist groups like the Nation of Islam and the Black Panthers has been surging in the past few years.
Edited by CaptainCapsase on Jan 10th 2019 at 1:46:29 PM
Trump’s “Big Beautiful Wall” can be apparently cut through with a household saw.
However, testing by DHS in late 2017 showed all eight prototypes, including the steel slats, were vulnerable to breaching, according to an internal February 2018 U.S. Customs and Border Protection report.
Photos of the breaches were not included in a redacted version of the CBP report, which was first obtained in a Freedom of Information Act Request by San Diego public broadcaster KPBS.
Edited by megaeliz on Jan 10th 2019 at 1:42:22 PM

I would say that the "anti-elite" rhetoric is the more damning stuff. You can genuinely have an anti-establishment politician if their platform really is heterodox to the party's norm in some way. But any politician competing at a high level, anywhere in the world, is intrinsically elite.
"For all those whose cares have been our concern, the work goes on, the cause endures, the hope still lives, and the dream shall never die."