Nov 2023 Mod notice:
There may be other, more specific, threads about some aspects of US politics, but this one tends to act as a hub for all sorts of related news and information, so it's usually one of the busiest OTC threads.
If you're new to OTC, it's worth reading the Introduction to On-Topic Conversations
and the On-Topic Conversations debate guidelines
before posting here.
Rumor-based, fear-mongering and/or inflammatory statements that damage the quality of the thread will be thumped. Off-topic posts will also be thumped. Repeat offenders may be suspended.
If time spent moderating this thread remains a distraction from moderation of the wiki itself, the thread will need to be locked. We want to avoid that, so please follow the forum rules
when posting here.
In line with the general forum rules, 'gravedancing' is prohibited here. If you're celebrating someone's death or hoping that they die, your post will get thumped. This rule applies regardless of what the person you're discussing has said or done.
Edited by Mrph1 on Nov 30th 2023 at 11:03:59 AM
https://www.politico.com/story/2018/12/11/pelosi-disses-trumps-manhood-white-house-meeting-1057607
Apparently Pelosi had a few things to say about Trump after their confrontation yesterday, with the report claiming that she said Trump must have said the word 'wall' 30 times and (in line with the earlier given proverbs) "I was trying to be the mom. It goes to show you: You get into a tinkle contest with a skunk, you get tinkle all over you." (I can't help but be amused by the Gosh Dang It to Heck!-ness of that)
Perhaps the one Trump will actually care about, though: “It’s like a manhood thing with him — as if manhood can be associated with him,” Pelosi deadpanned. “This wall thing.”
The president may have decided at the last minute to open up the entire negotiation session to the public to throw Pelosi and Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer of New York off their game. But in the end, Democrats feel confident that their leaders came out ahead.
Trump, Democrats argue, fell into a trap the minute he took ownership of what Pelosi has dubbed “the Trump shutdown.” Absent a bipartisan agreement on Trump’s border wall, about a quarter of the government will run out of money on Dec. 21.
But instead of finger-pointing, as Republicans and Democrats usually do during spending standoffs, Trump said he wanted to close the government and said he wouldn't even try to pass the blame.
Edited by sgamer82 on Dec 12th 2018 at 9:08:39 AM
You know...I maybe shouldn't, but I kind of start to feel respect for Cohan. Well, not for what he did in the past. But, well, he went into this without a plea deal, right? It takes some guts to face what you have done, and admit it to the world. Maybe he isn't a complete piece of sh... (unlike the other people involved in this sorry story).
Well, he continuously backed up Trump while doing those illegal things he ordered and only relented when faced with so much evidence he had no option to plead innocence, so... no respect for him from my end.
Life is unfair...Honestly, I’d say the really amazing part is that Federal judge William H. Pauley III, just said straight out, that “Individual-1” directed Cohen to commit Federal Crimes. note
Edited by megaeliz on Dec 12th 2018 at 12:49:27 PM
He did take a plea deal. I'll quote from Vox:
Cohen pleaded guilty to all of the above crimes. Yet in his plea deals, he conspicuously did not commit to cooperate with prosecutors regarding further criminal investigations. Instead, he took a different approach — he’d voluntarily provide certain information to Mueller’s office and other probes.
Cohen’s lawyers claimed he did this to speed up his sentencing so he could move on with his life. Perhaps more plausible is the theory that Cohen has been involved in a lot of shady activities over the years, and so preferred to pick and choose what he’d cooperate about rather than being obligated to tell everything he knows.
What I can't get over is just how tiny Cohen's sentence seems to be. Seriously.
When buying elections, selling your "expertise" in gaining access and/or favour with the boss and schmoozing with anybody with a decent-sized wallet isn't seen as worse than the supposed destabilising of society that carrying a packet of weed does, something's horribly wrong.
Even the Sumerian Code of Ur-Nammu wanted more-expensive-than-normal fines for "white collar" crime. And, false accusers or false witnesses... yeouch: expect to cough up enough to have to sell yourself into slavery to cover it. <_<
A Million Is a Statistic. That's why killing a bunch of people is a crime while enacting policies that do the same isn't. "Tough on crime" for some reason only extends to flashy crimes. Funny that.
Edited by SeptimusHeap on Dec 12th 2018 at 7:29:09 PM
"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard FeynmanI remain unconvinced that paying off his former mistress should have been a campaign expense. Even if it should have been, given that it's never really been tested, I think Trump has a good argument of "It wasn't intentional because I thought it was better to use my own funds because I've used my own funds previously for similar expenses." Even then, typically campaign finance violations result in a fine.
If you're doing it in a way that benefits your campaign, it's an in-kind contribution. He might have gotten off with just a fine if he had been honest about it, but his continued denials only make it more likely he'll have the book thrown at him (or the campaign) for it.
Speaking of elections, the Senate actually did something good. At 50-49, they overturned a policy which would have limited donor disclosure requirements for political nonprofits.
Unfortunately, the House isn't likely to take it up, so it's more symbolic than anything.
And of course given his pro-barely hidden corruption predilections, the turtle from Kentucky had to oppose it:
"Prior to the vote, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) said the resolution was an "attempt by some of our Democratic colleagues to undo a pro-privacy reform. ... In a climate that is increasingly hostile to certain kinds of political expression and open debate, the last thing Washington needs to do is to chill the exercise of free speech and add to the sense of intimidation.""
Ugh, I so despise this man.
"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard FeynmanMitch notably killed the legalization of weed in Kentucky after hours and hours of listening to veterans and opiod addicts as well as joint support from both parties. Including listening to people talking about how the traffic of opiods was killing thousands and this could seriously relieve both poverty, illness, and pain. He didn't even have an excuse, he just tabled it for next year...and then did it again when the year passed.
As for Cohen, my respect is limited to the fact he's a criminal with a grasp of reality and self-interest enough not to screw himself more like Manafort. I don't need or want to respect his morality (and don't) but I can certainly understand he's got a better head on his shoulders than most of these idiots.
Edited by CharlesPhipps on Dec 12th 2018 at 12:06:54 PM
Author of The Rules of Supervillainy, Cthulhu Armageddon, and United States of Monsters.From the Jurisdiction Friction page, the FBI is concerned with the "Fruit of the Poisoned Tree" scenario (CIA got the information unlawfully, and thus the FBI wouldn't be able to prosecute afterward), while the CIA is worried the FBI could leak the information since they aren't anywhere near as Properly Paranoid as the CIA would like.
And in more recent news, we've got:
- The Senate voted (50-49, with Susan Collins flipping to the Dem side and Thom Tillis [R-NC] abstaining) to repeal an IRS guideline allowing tax-exempt groups to be more secretive about their donors
. Still has to pass the House, and Trump could veto it... but it's a start, and would make him and the GOP look even worse.
- Rand Paul is apparently not a fan of Trump's new Attorney General pick
, due to Barr's support for the PATRIOT Act (which expanded domestic surveillance) and Civil Asset Forfeiture. He's a mixed bag on maintaining opposition, as he voted to confirm Pompeo after decrying him, but voted against Gina Haspel for the CIA post.
- Trump told Reuters that he's not concerned about being impeached
, because "I think that the people would revolt if that happened." As soon as I read that excerpt, all I could think was History of the World Part I - "Trump's supporters are revolting!" "And they're ugly, too!
And nix that last one - I was thinking about this exchange from Dragonheart
- Einon: The peasants are revolting!
Brok: They've always been revolting, prince. Now they're rebellin'.
Edited by ironballs16 on Dec 12th 2018 at 4:07:25 AM
"Why would I inflict myself on somebody else?"In more "nice to have it confirmed but not surprising in the least" news: National Enquirer owner admits to paying off Playboy model to protect Trump
. Bummed that they aren't going to be prosecuted for it, though.
EDIT:
Edited by speedyboris on Dec 12th 2018 at 3:23:47 AM

If Trump is up for re-election in 2020 (and he probably will be); there will be rioting after the result, at the very least. Calling it now.
Politics is the skilled use of blunt objects.