Nov 2023 Mod notice:
There may be other, more specific, threads about some aspects of US politics, but this one tends to act as a hub for all sorts of related news and information, so it's usually one of the busiest OTC threads.
If you're new to OTC, it's worth reading the Introduction to On-Topic Conversations
and the On-Topic Conversations debate guidelines
before posting here.
Rumor-based, fear-mongering and/or inflammatory statements that damage the quality of the thread will be thumped. Off-topic posts will also be thumped. Repeat offenders may be suspended.
If time spent moderating this thread remains a distraction from moderation of the wiki itself, the thread will need to be locked. We want to avoid that, so please follow the forum rules
when posting here.
In line with the general forum rules, 'gravedancing' is prohibited here. If you're celebrating someone's death or hoping that they die, your post will get thumped. This rule applies regardless of what the person you're discussing has said or done.
Edited by Mrph1 on Nov 30th 2023 at 11:03:59 AM
Honest question: What did you read it as? Because I didn't see anything wrong with it.
Fiat iustitia, et pereat mundus.At this point, the Democrats need to be corralled into toeing the damned Party line - which is to make life miserable for the GOP so they don't screw over the United States further.
Open Mouth, Insert Foot commentary from the likes of Hillary Clinton are precisely what they need to stomp down on. They can argue about specifics once power is theirs. Until then, no.
I hold the secrets of the machine.US Border Patrol apparently launched tear gas into Mexico.
Which is I. an International Incident of the highest order and II. Tear Gas is banned in International Affairs since 1997
"You can reply to this Message!"![]()
![]()
Not to say that I condone the incident, but I don’t think there’s a winnable legal case against the US there. Chemical agents are only outlawed in war and are perfectly legal everywhere else, and there’s precedent allowing US law enforcement to shoot across the border.
Edited by archonspeaks on Nov 25th 2018 at 1:48:13 AM
They should have sent a poet.Putin's personal phallus polisher AKA Donald Trump
Europe has to pay their fair share for Military Protection. The European Union, for many years, has taken advantage of us on Trade, and then they don’t live up to their Military commitment through NATO. Things must change fast!
And not long after...
Russia fires at Ukraine ships and captures three vessels amid rising tensions off Crimea
That sort of view could have some ground in reality after WWII with what almost all of Europe in ruins and the USSR on the rise; nowadays however that's a very distanced view of reality. Just a reminder how backwards is Trump in terms of views.
Instead of focusing on relatives that divide us, we should find the absolutes that tie us.No, that point of view never had any merits. The US didn't didn't go on a race for Berlin for shits and giggles, you know. Communism was a huge threat for them because it was THEIR companies which ended up in the hand of the national state. They protected "the West" (I hate the term) because they wanted to protect their most important markets, not because of the goodness of their heart.
And don't get me wrong here, they did well overall. As much as the cold war sucked, I wonder what would have happened to Europe if they hadn't decided to pump money into the destroyed countries. But the narrative that they were altruistic about it is just BS.
Well, it's definitely possible that some US officials that were involved in securing support for financing the rebuilding of Europe and the establishment of NATO were doing it out of idealistic altruism (at least partly). The government isn't a monolithic entity, or even a tiny oligarchy; besides the executive's cabinet members, you have the 500-something members of Congress that the executive branch needed to negotiate with in.
Edited by MarqFJA on Nov 25th 2018 at 4:20:40 PM
Fiat iustitia, et pereat mundus.The financial system in the United States government was wholly different than it is 2018.
Securing formerly nationalized markets under Nazi control against the Soviet Union seems like it was probably a low low priority.
Author of The Rules of Supervillainy, Cthulhu Armageddon, and United States of Monsters.In the United States, right-wing violence is on the rise
I'm sure this doesn't really surprise anyone here, but still got to keep in mind.
But I think it's pretty notable that despite total number of incidence decreasing since 1970, deaths have been increasing from them.
Edited by LSBK on Nov 25th 2018 at 9:28:04 AM
![]()
![]()
It really wasn't. Why do you think the Marshal plan won over other ideas in the end? Why do you think the US really didn't like Russia even while technically allied with it? The common sentiment was that no matter how many died at the eastern front, it was a win for the US, because only a dead Russian was a good Russian.
Remember, back then, a there were already subsidiaries of American companies in Germany. Coca Cola is a famous example of that.
Meanwhile, budget deficits
are increasing and Trump's requests less deficits with more spending and no tax hikes. Apparently that's far from the first time Trump has flunked financial questions, too.
Also, When staffers sought to include an attack on Democrats’ Medicare-for-all proposals in Trump’s campaign speeches this fall, he initially blanched, two administration aides said. Medicare is popular, he said, and voters want it. Eventually, he agreed to the attack if he could say Democrats were going to take the entitlement away.
"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard FeynmanCharacterizing the USSR as being 'on the rise' after 1945 is a bit of a misnomer. It had lost one sixth of its population, half its industrial heartland and its breadbasket were in shambles, and while it had extended its territorial control to the Baltics, Poland, East Germany and Hungary, this only placed more of a burden on the Soviet system. Poland had been looted by the fascists, then by the Red Army. East Germany was in shambles after the push on Berlin. Hungary wasn't faring much better. All of it would need to be rebuilt, by a world power that was still suffering from its own economic woes.
The rot that would kill the USSR had already set in by 1945.
And NATO was never a protection racket. The US doesn't receive any funding for its military through NATO. The only thing the organization facilitates is arms trading, which is handy if you're the world's number one exporter of military equipment. It's also a way to further the reach of American power, always a problem for a nation with an ocean between any of its geopolitical rivals. The most you could argue was that the US leveraged its economic resources to pull European governments in a certain direction, but that's just empire business as usual.
Edited by math792d on Nov 26th 2018 at 1:40:21 PM
Still not embarrassing enough to stan billionaires or tech companies.

> Hillary should probably just focus on being a grandmother. Her time has passed.
Might wanna rethink that post of yours,just saying as it might be read as something else because the first time I read it I went "Yikes"
Edited by Ultimatum on Nov 25th 2018 at 1:14:34 AM
have a listen and have a link to my discord server