Nov 2023 Mod notice:
There may be other, more specific, threads about some aspects of US politics, but this one tends to act as a hub for all sorts of related news and information, so it's usually one of the busiest OTC threads.
If you're new to OTC, it's worth reading the Introduction to On-Topic Conversations
and the On-Topic Conversations debate guidelines
before posting here.
Rumor-based, fear-mongering and/or inflammatory statements that damage the quality of the thread will be thumped. Off-topic posts will also be thumped. Repeat offenders may be suspended.
If time spent moderating this thread remains a distraction from moderation of the wiki itself, the thread will need to be locked. We want to avoid that, so please follow the forum rules
when posting here.
In line with the general forum rules, 'gravedancing' is prohibited here. If you're celebrating someone's death or hoping that they die, your post will get thumped. This rule applies regardless of what the person you're discussing has said or done.
Edited by Mrph1 on Nov 30th 2023 at 11:03:59 AM
"Our thoughts and prayers to the victims of the 47th shooting this year. What a February we're having. If only they'd purchased a SMITH & WESSON HANDCANNON SUPREME! That's right, folks, the Smith & Wesson Handcannon Supreme is just the thing you need to defend yourself from terrorists or whoever. For just $99.99 plus tax, the Handcannon Supreme can be in your hands!
You know the only thing that stops a bad guy with a Handcannon Supreme is a good guy with a Handcannon Supreme, so don't delay! The Handcannon Supreme, coming to a Walmart near you. Preorder now!" ~The 2048 Republican Presidential Candidate
My Tumblr. Currently side-by-side liveblogging Digimon Adventure, sub vs dub.Mr. Presidential Candidate, why do so many bad guys HAVE Handcannon Supremes, anyway?
Oh God! Natural light!And notice- the white male Kroger shooter who killed two black elders, the white-adjacent male who mailed bombs to a dozen Democrats and critics of the President, and the white male synagogue shooter who murdered 8 people, and wounded 3 cops, all got taken alive (as they should have been).
Meanwhile, unarmed black kids are dead because the cops were “scared.”
Gun rights come with a massive, whites-only asterisk.
Studies show the death penalty is useless as a deterrent, plus it’s disproportionately imposed on black and brown men. Hmm, wonder why the president likes it. Wonder if it’s related to how he said the Charlottesville Nazis were fine people but he also said the Central Park 5, even after they were proven innocent, deserved to be executed.
Edited by wisewillow on Oct 27th 2018 at 3:13:17 PM
![]()
Who wants to bet that this is an attempt to sneak a "Final Solution" under the public's noses?
Edited by MorningStar1337 on Oct 27th 2018 at 12:12:40 PM
- Step 1: Death penalty for severe offenders.
- Step 2: Label border crossing a severe offense.
Yeah. I can see Trump doing that. He has spent two years tarring them with the "rapists and murderers" brush, after all.
Edited by TobiasDrake on Oct 27th 2018 at 1:16:13 PM
My Tumblr. Currently side-by-side liveblogging Digimon Adventure, sub vs dub.![]()
![]()
Not exactly. That’s going a bit far. But there is a strong use of criminalization against black and brown people, along with white dissenters.
So, here’s the thing. Society doesn’t generally like crime/criminals. So, how do you crush the people you hate because of their race, religion, sexuality, or opposition to your regime?
You criminalize them. You enforce minor laws against them, while ignoring those laws for the favored groups (i.e. black kids in poor neighborhoods getting locked up for small amounts of marijuana, while rich white kids smoke all the weed they want and are rarely prosecuted).
You make new laws that will tighten the rope around the oppressed groups- make it illegal for them to use the right bathroom, make it a felony to not have up to date paperwork, make their protests illegal because they’re “disruptive.”
Sound familiar?
Essentially, yes.
Edited by wisewillow on Oct 27th 2018 at 3:20:07 PM
Holding children's families hostage as political capital is a crime against humanity and falls under the definition of genocide.
I don't think Trump wants to wipe out any ethnic groups but he wants to remove them from America as much as possible.
Author of The Rules of Supervillainy, Cthulhu Armageddon, and United States of Monsters.![]()
I don’t know. I hope not. But my legal conference yesterday had a long session on lawyers in 1930s Germany, and there’s a lot of frightening similarities to what’s currently happening with Trump, Fox News, and the alt-right and their propaganda and policy proposals regarding immigrants and anti-Semitism.
A year or two ago, I would have agreed. Now? I think he’s perfectly okay with killing “the bad ones” and with having a very broad definition of who counts as bad.
Edited by wisewillow on Oct 27th 2018 at 3:36:34 PM
Speaking to your point, here’s a twitter thread from Bree Newsome, the activist who climbed a flag pole to take down South Carolina’s confederate flag a few years back, discussing America’s history of splitting into three broad groups when dealing with white supremacy.
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
No, it doesn’t. Genocide is a specific term meaning targeted mass killing with the goal of destroying an ethnic group by a governing body. What’s happening now, as horrific as it is, is not genocide.
Frankly, all this talk of genocide and martial law is simply obfuscating the actual issues, not to mention being somewhat dismissive of the actual victims of those things. If you honestly think a genocide is about to occur in the US I suggest you reevaluate your opinions on current events.
Edited by archonspeaks on Oct 27th 2018 at 12:47:02 PM
They should have sent a poet.![]()
Actually, Charles has a point. According to the United Nations:
a. Killing members of the group;
b. Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group;
c. Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part;
d. Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group;
e. Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group.
Parts b and e would apply to the detention and incarceration of predominantly-Latino and brown immigrants and the incarceration and eventual permanent forcible adoption of their children to majority-white American citizen parents.
I’ll also note that the genocide of the Native Americans was a long slow process over decades; more were killed by deliberately spread disease and by the murder of the Buffalo than were killed in open battle by settlers and American soldiers.
Edited by wisewillow on Oct 27th 2018 at 3:57:22 PM
Also not really. If we were sterilizing them, or had a specific policy of giving all of the children being held to all-white families, then it might meet the description. Even then, we would have to be doing it to all the Latinos in the country, which we are not.
Seriously. This can be an awful situation that we fight against as much as we can without being genocide. Calling it that is disrespectful to the actual victims of genocide.
Every bad thing isn’t genocide or a crime against humanity, those are terms with meaning.
Edited by archonspeaks on Oct 27th 2018 at 1:03:25 AM
They should have sent a poet.Speaking from my personal experience, it's part of a larger problem where many people unfortunately don't care about what will actually help prevent or decrease crime. What they do care about is living out their vindictive urges and getting an illusion of justice and safety that makes them feel better, even if it doesn't actually help anything.
Edited by MarqFJA on Oct 27th 2018 at 11:10:19 AM
Fiat iustitia, et pereat mundus.

Republicans won’t be happy until every American is walking around with weapons leveled in condition zero at everyone they see.
They should have sent a poet.