Nov 2023 Mod notice:
There may be other, more specific, threads about some aspects of US politics, but this one tends to act as a hub for all sorts of related news and information, so it's usually one of the busiest OTC threads.
If you're new to OTC, it's worth reading the Introduction to On-Topic Conversations
and the On-Topic Conversations debate guidelines
before posting here.
Rumor-based, fear-mongering and/or inflammatory statements that damage the quality of the thread will be thumped. Off-topic posts will also be thumped. Repeat offenders may be suspended.
If time spent moderating this thread remains a distraction from moderation of the wiki itself, the thread will need to be locked. We want to avoid that, so please follow the forum rules
when posting here.
In line with the general forum rules, 'gravedancing' is prohibited here. If you're celebrating someone's death or hoping that they die, your post will get thumped. This rule applies regardless of what the person you're discussing has said or done.
Edited by Mrph1 on Nov 30th 2023 at 11:03:59 AM
... we can disagree on the extent of democratic support of Native Americans without accusations of dishonesty. And I note no citations to democrats making huge strides for Native Americans when they were in power.
When Obama was president, there was some progress on Native American issues. But democrats have not prioritized Native American issues. Obama was president during Standing Rock, and he didn’t do nearly enough to help the Native American community.
And in horrible, horrible breaking news, a shooter attacked a synagogue this morning, killing eight and wounding others.
The suspect, a white male, has been taken into custody, alive.
If you have any Jewish friends, a message to express sympathy and support wouldn’t go amiss. Jesus Christ.
Let's suppose he turns out to be a Republican and that he says he was motivated by Trump's policies/statements. What do you think the GOP's reactions would be?
Fiat iustitia, et pereat mundus.> When Obama was president, there was some progress on Native American issues. But democrats have not prioritized Native American issues. Obama was president during Standing Rock, and he didn’t do nearly enough to help the Native American community.
Ultimately Obama doing anything at all was reliant on congress playing nice,and the Republicans were determined to thwart him at every turn,it's a miracle Obama care survived at all during his presidency.
Edited by Ultimatum on Oct 27th 2018 at 8:56:41 AM
have a listen and have a link to my discord serverhttps://twitter.com/lrozen/status/1056211447351595008
"alleged suspect had post 2hrs ago blaming jewish immigration resettlement org for caravan, “likes to bring invaders in that kill our people”
Let's put it this way: If the Democrats are in control of the congress and the house and are still not doing anything for native americans, then they deserve criticism. But those periods are short and usually the democrats have other pressing matters to attend to when it happens (like pushing for healthcare for everyone).
For now there is one party which makes the lives of native americans actively worse and one which is at least ready to listen.
Suppression (and later, neglect) of indigenous groups in more or less every former colony (and even in places like Northern Europe vis a vis the Sami, etc), has been and sadly is (mostly) a bi-partisan issue. Its a national sin in almost every case, penetrating the entire political and social apparatus.
You also have to get local governments to play ball, which in places like the US is like herding cats.
That said, while the Democrats are far from perfect on this file, they are leagues ahead of the Republicans.
Edited by Rationalinsanity on Oct 27th 2018 at 1:25:32 PM
Politics is the skilled use of blunt objects.What has made it so Australia actually commemorates its history of mistreatment of the Aboriginal population
and has properly apologized for the Lost Generations, South Africa has legitimately confronted the memory of Apartheid, and Germany has done everything it can to teach its citizens about the crimes they'd committed in the past, but the U.S. has never even made a token move to admit responsibility for what it's done to African-Americans and Native Americans? Why is it so hard for the U.S. to actually look at itself in the mirror, realize the sheer extent of what it's done, and actually try to heal some wounds?
I don’t think you should give an apology only if you’re expecting forgiveness - rather, an apology is the first step towards making things right.
I’d argue that the government should find a way to make reparations somehow.
Edited by KarkatTheDalek on Oct 27th 2018 at 1:57:02 PM
Oh God! Natural light!When Obama was President the Democrats only held Congress briefly and used that political capital to pass the ACA, which led to a backlash that caused Republicans to take control of the House and vast swathes of Local Governments.
Of course the Democrats couldn't help Native Americans when they literally were not in power, this is not evidence that the Democratic Party will not support Native Americans if they can. It's simple that for recent memory they've been out of power and thus simply could not help anyone.
It has nothing to do with political priorities and everything to do with not being in a position to actually help. To use that as evidence that Democrats don't care is gross historical revisionism.
Edited by Fourthspartan56 on Oct 27th 2018 at 1:26:02 PM
"Einstein would turn over in his grave. Not only does God play dice, the dice are loaded." -Chairman Sheng-Ji YangThough I understand the reasoning behind not wanting the Democrats to apologize (some of which I'd normally lean towards), I'm just going to say that things like this usually aren't about logic or reasoning (not that the pro-apologize side is being illogical).
And ultimately if it could better cement an in to help repair damage, it would be worth. It's not like issuing an apology would actually harm anything, anyway, this basically sounds like a "principle of the matter" type deal, which while those can be genuinely important, I'm not so sure this is the best line in the sand to draw.
Perhaps it'd be a better idea later down the line, if the Democrats are in power again - that way they could semi-legitimately apologize 'on behalf of the United States of America' - which would have the added bonus of drawing out bigots who'd complain that they'd apologize in the first place.
Those sell-by-dates won't stop me because I can't read!This is uncomfortably verging on the same kind of rhetoric I often hear about, "Black people need to shut the f*ck up about slavery. I, personally, have never owned any slaves, so don't blame me just 'cause you can't man the f*ck up and get over it! Sincerely, White Dudes."
Like it or not, we're flying Jackson's banner. That means we should make a conscious effort to both distance ourselves from Jackson and to show his victims that we're not those people. I'm going to quote a bit about redemption from this comic
here:
We remain haunted by the sins of the past because we are trying to simply move forward and forget them. We're merely executing our duty, trying to improve the lives of Americans everywhere, while making no effort to actually seek forgiveness or atone for the Democrats of the past.
You, personally, have probably never committed genocide against the Native American people. I know I haven't. Never even felt tempted to. But the party isn't defined by you, personally. Or by me. Or by any individual that has membership in it. The party is more than its members. It's an idea that was here long before us, will be here after us, and hasn't always been an idea we can support.
Republicans thrive on this continuity on identity. Much of their support is built on the history of the GOP versus the history of the Democrats. The Party of Lincoln versus the Party of Slavery, Genocide, etc. And like it or not, that history will always be there. You cannot run from the past.
You might not have done anything wrong. I might not have. But the only way we're ever going to chip away the Republicans' ill-begotten "moral high ground" is by making an effort to not just execute our duty, but to redeem the Party. And that starts with atonement for those the Party's hurt. We have that responsibility so long as we continue to fly its banner.
Edited by TobiasDrake on Oct 27th 2018 at 12:01:56 PM
My Tumblr. Currently side-by-side liveblogging Digimon Adventure, sub vs dub.

And while democrats are less ACTIVELY harmful than the republicans, the democrats have not done nearly enough to support, let alone expand, the rights of Native Americans to be first class citizens.
You are being actively dishonest, all of those things are directly countered by Democratic policies. To act as if the Democratic Party is just passively harmful to Native Americans is a lie and has no connection to reality.
If Democrats had the opportunity to implement their policies in Native American communities then things would get better for them and to suggest otherwise is nothing more than ignorant #bothsides nonsense.
Edited by Fourthspartan56 on Oct 27th 2018 at 11:28:14 AM
"Einstein would turn over in his grave. Not only does God play dice, the dice are loaded." -Chairman Sheng-Ji Yang