Nov 2023 Mod notice:
There may be other, more specific, threads about some aspects of US politics, but this one tends to act as a hub for all sorts of related news and information, so it's usually one of the busiest OTC threads.
If you're new to OTC, it's worth reading the Introduction to On-Topic Conversations
and the On-Topic Conversations debate guidelines
before posting here.
Rumor-based, fear-mongering and/or inflammatory statements that damage the quality of the thread will be thumped. Off-topic posts will also be thumped. Repeat offenders may be suspended.
If time spent moderating this thread remains a distraction from moderation of the wiki itself, the thread will need to be locked. We want to avoid that, so please follow the forum rules
when posting here.
In line with the general forum rules, 'gravedancing' is prohibited here. If you're celebrating someone's death or hoping that they die, your post will get thumped. This rule applies regardless of what the person you're discussing has said or done.
Edited by Mrph1 on Nov 30th 2023 at 11:03:59 AM
So, Trump and crew are on the warpath, trying to determine who among them spoke to Woodward. Another upcoming plan is too attack the credibility of the former members of the administration who spoke to him.
https://www.cnn.com/2018/09/05/politics/trump-woodward-book-leakers/index.html
And since I doubt that anyone believes that the NYT made shit up and/or believed a random anonymous message, I suspect that a hunt for The Mole to begin in earnest as well.
Politics is the skilled use of blunt objects.Personally, I'm rather suspicious of this article, given the way it's worded and the timing of its publication.
By deduction, the person is a Republican — they openly favour the tax cut bill that was passed, which may or may not make them wealthy, but does most likely make them a staunch Republican. They state they believe that Trump's policies have 'already made America safer and more prosperous' — language that comes straight from Trump himself. More importantly, it comes across as a dog-whistle for supporting the immigration ban.
They state they're part of the resistance but are so quick to distance themselves from the left that it's obvious they're aiming the article at Republican voters who would never support the Democrats but who don't want to vote for Trump or his supporters.
Most importantly, note how they point out they're part of the group that's mitigating Trump's worst behaviours and how, later on in the article, they state that the people in the White House who are opposing Trump's agenda are 'unsung heroes'.
So, they're patting themselves on their own back for their own self-styled heroism.
It also makes no sense to post this article at all, knowing that the information will likely get back to Trump and send him off on one of his leakers, fake news and anonymous sources rants. Unless that's the point — if it does annoy Trump, it brings attention to its existence and gains wide media coverage. It potentially reaches a wider audience that way.
My suspicion is that the purpose of this article is to reassure Republicans who don't want to associate with Trump and who don't want to associate with the Democrats. When you look at the article from that perspective, this article is reassuring — there are good Republicans protecting the country and Republican values from the president, but that will all be destroyed if the left (with their completely different resistence agenda) manages to get too many electoral successes in the mid-terms.
In short, this article looks to me to be designed to get Republicans out and voting. It might also be encouraging Democratic voters, especially Blue Dog voters, to stay at home and not worry because the country is in 'safe' hands even though Trump is present.
Edited by Wyldchyld on Sep 5th 2018 at 12:29:50 PM
If my post doesn't mention a giant flying sperm whale with oversized teeth and lionfish fins for flippers, it just isn't worth reading.Believe it or not, some people are thinking that Pence, of all people, wrote it, mostly because it uses the term lodestar, an odd choice of word that Pence has repeatedly made use of.
Oh God! Natural light!My gut instinct was that it's been written by a Pence supporter. That wasn't because of the lodestar reference, however.
Edited by Wyldchyld on Sep 6th 2018 at 10:27:40 AM
If my post doesn't mention a giant flying sperm whale with oversized teeth and lionfish fins for flippers, it just isn't worth reading.In good news: a series of new polls have consistently put Trump in the mid-high 30s of approval, instead of in the low 40s. This is pushing him back towards his pre-tax cut numbers and if the trend holds or worsens it will only make things worse for the GOP in November.
https://www.cnn.com/2018/09/05/politics/trump-approval-drop-midterms/index.html
Edited by Rationalinsanity on Sep 5th 2018 at 8:32:37 AM
Politics is the skilled use of blunt objects.This all feels like the biggest case of the emerperor having no clothes, with everyone on Trump's side too proud or afraid of embarassment to just admit what everyone else can obviously see. And for some it's just in their interest to keep telling the lie, whether they believe it or not.
But really, Trump and Trump's people are probably proud of being as blatantly corrupt ad they are, because some people just get off on that abuse of power. Like, the kind of people who could win without cheating but do it anyway because getting away with it makes them feel smarter than the suckers they fool. It gets to the point where their whole world view revolves around scamming everyone they meet. A kind of sadism, maybe?
This whole mess is too dumb to be a conspiracy, but it is a con. Just some thoughts.
Honestly, I'm surprised he hasn't done it yet (as far as I know).
x7 It is mentioned that the NY Times knows the identity of the writer, for what it's worth.
And anyway, haven't we suspected that there were people within the Trump White House, giving him the Bureaucratic run around on some of his dumber ideas, and trying to reign him in somewhat (keyword: trying), for a while now? I mean, the leaks have to come from somewhere.
Edited by megaeliz on Sep 5th 2018 at 8:29:03 AM
The LA Times responded to the NY Times piece with one of their own,
calling the writer a coward.
If you're reading this, senior White House official, know this: You are not resisting Donald Trump. You are enabling him for your own benefit. That doesn't make you an unsung hero. It makes you a coward.
I have mixed feelings about it.
On one hand, they are just as despicable as he is, just less obvious about it. They still support the Republican agenda, they just are smart enough to realize that Trump is stark raving bananas. They dug their own graves, and now all of us have to suffer as a result.
On the other hand, in the middle of this situation, I'm just kinda glad that there's relatively rational (in comparison) people in the White House, who recognize that Trump is a narcissistic idiot, and are actively trying to keep things running in a frankly insane situation.
As I pointed out before, this is something we've suspected for a while now. It explains a lot about for example, the difference between what Trump has said, versus what his administration has actually done about Russia.
Astute observers have noted, though, that the rest of the administration is operating on another track, one where countries like Russia are called out for meddling and punished accordingly, and where allies around the world are engaged as peers rather than ridiculed as rivals.
On Russia, for instance, the president was reluctant to expel so many of Mr. Putin’s spies as punishment for the poisoning of a former Russian spy in Britain. He complained for weeks about senior staff members letting him get boxed into further confrontation with Russia, and he expressed frustration that the United States continued to impose sanctions on the country for its malign behavior. But his national security team knew better — such actions had to be taken, to hold Moscow accountable.
This isn’t the work of the so-called deep state. It’s the work of the steady state.
I think it may have even been discussed here at one point.
Edited by megaeliz on Sep 5th 2018 at 8:41:01 AM
I see it as a case of Evil Versus Oblivion. an unfettered Trump would surely cause the nukes to fly and turn the earth into a lifeless wasteland in days. The rest of the party wants a slower demise, one slow enough that they get to die first and enjoy their ill gotten gains.
With that said, I must admit that Trump's accusation of the op-ed as gutless is accurate, but probably for reasons different from Trump's, such as those of the LA times. And that opinion will never change unless they do invoke the 25th and get him out of office.
Edited by MorningStar1337 on Sep 5th 2018 at 5:44:07 AM
It does note one thing, if the op ed is to be believed the only reason they haven’t invoked the 25th is because they don’t want a constitutional crisis, so if one comes about anyway (such as an impeachment movement that gets enough popular support) they may take the plunge.
I’m still putting money on in the event that Trump leaves office early he has to be removed physically, he won’t resign and I wouldn’t put it past him to try and literally set the place on fire on his way out.
The talk of the 25th does make it seem like it’s either a cabinet member or someone close to a cabinet member. Also the lack of talk about religion as a point of success indicates to me that they either don’t consider that a point of success or consider to a huge point and avoided mentioning it to cover their tracks.
Edited by Silasw on Sep 5th 2018 at 12:52:23 PM
“And the Bunny nails it!” ~ Gabrael “If the UN can get through a day without everyone strangling everyone else so can we.” ~ CyranAnd on top of all this lovely stuff, Trump is still flirting with a shutdown over the Wall.
Go on Donald, do it. Don't want to look weak now, do we?
Whoever this writer is, they are no resistance. They are one of the people who enables this administration, putting a veneer of civility on it. They're the ones desperately slathering Trump's shit with frosting and telling the public it's cake.
Not that they need bother. Trump's supporters would gladly eat Trump's shit and call it fine chocolate. Everyone else can tell that putting frosting on shit doesn't make it cake — it's just frosted shit.
Disgusted, but not surprised

Slate has an article
about the book "Fear: Trump in the White House", that claims that the Cabinet is doing a less formal version of the 25th amendment, by subtly stymieing part of Trump's agenda.
Edited by MorningStar1337 on Sep 5th 2018 at 4:01:15 AM