Nov 2023 Mod notice:
There may be other, more specific, threads about some aspects of US politics, but this one tends to act as a hub for all sorts of related news and information, so it's usually one of the busiest OTC threads.
If you're new to OTC, it's worth reading the Introduction to On-Topic Conversations
and the On-Topic Conversations debate guidelines
before posting here.
Rumor-based, fear-mongering and/or inflammatory statements that damage the quality of the thread will be thumped. Off-topic posts will also be thumped. Repeat offenders may be suspended.
If time spent moderating this thread remains a distraction from moderation of the wiki itself, the thread will need to be locked. We want to avoid that, so please follow the forum rules
when posting here.
In line with the general forum rules, 'gravedancing' is prohibited here. If you're celebrating someone's death or hoping that they die, your post will get thumped. This rule applies regardless of what the person you're discussing has said or done.
Edited by Mrph1 on Nov 30th 2023 at 11:03:59 AM
Manafort's defense strategy seems to be focusing on pinning the crimes on Rick Gates.
https://www.cnn.com/politics/live-news/manafort-trial/h_dc8da3fdf73dec89c0aa7d241b1e8d34
Manafort's defense strategy seems to be focusing on pinning the crimes on Rick Gates.
See, I thought that "someone else did it" being used as a defense strategy is a last-ditch effort when there is absolutely no doubt about your guilt anymore.
"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard FeynmanGates has already plead guilty to a pair of felonies (lying to investigators and conspiracy) in exchange for getting the rest dropped. But I doubt that one man could pull off such a scheme alone, it was probably a team effort. And since Gates flipped, they've got the best source of evidence possible.
Politics is the skilled use of blunt objects.
Agreed - the Prisoner's Dilemma has already happened, and Manafort is late to the punch on it.
"Why would I inflict myself on somebody else?"Trump doesn't like 3D printed guns after talking with the NRA.
Broken clock syndrome? NRA trying to save themselves? Or both?
"We're all paper, we're all scissors, we're all fightin' with our mirrors, scared we'll never find somebody to love."Broken clock syndrome? NRA trying to save themselves? Or both?
Why would the like them? They aren't in it for the gun owners, there in it for the gun companies... And that threatens to hurt there bottom lines.
....
And blow off the hands of any one stupid enough to use them, but they dont care about that bit, just the bottom line one.
Well this one's just funny. A Russian woman and her husband were recently arrested in Florida and extradited to NY on charges that they ran a prostitution ring out of their Trump Tower apartment
.
Cue jokes about how Trump wanted his Russian urine fresher than shipping would allow.
No, not necessarily - they've boycotted firearm manufacturers before for being too willing to play ball in regards to regulation.
Edited by ironballs16 on Jul 31st 2018 at 2:51:55 AM
"Why would I inflict myself on somebody else?"RE: Medicare For All, if that study is correct and the implementation decreases total USA healthcare spending you shouldn't even have to raise many taxes to fund it. All spending carries the same inflation risk in the same markets, doesn't matter whether it's public, private, deficit spending or balanced out by taxes.
You would probably have to raise taxes in order to counterbalance the fact that most of those negated private healthcare bills will be spent on other things rather than saved, but it wouldn't have to be 1:1 with the deficit increase in order to prevent any increase in inflation.
My amateur economics knowledge says that the spending-neutral tax raise would have to be 34 trillion times American marginal propensity to consume (which is somewhere between 90 and 98%, call it 94.5%) minus 2 trillion. You'd be a bit over half a trillion dollars a year better off before you account for any improvements in healthcare coverage and not ruining the lives of poor people randomly.
Edited by DeathorCake on Jul 31st 2018 at 10:05:21 AM
'Fact Is Russia Meddled' in 2016 Election, Pence Says
I wonder if this will cause any more internal strife.
Well that's... legitimately shocking.
I wonder if Pence is looking forward to a possible career beyond Trump? Or maybe he's been in contact with Republican leadership and they've been souring on denialism?
"Einstein would turn over in his grave. Not only does God play dice, the dice are loaded." -Chairman Sheng-Ji YangThat's... yeah.
There is, mind you, a situation where it's genuinely in Pence's favour to say stuff like that. If he believes that Trump's going down sooner rather than later, then if distances himself from the whole mess, there isn't an excuse to impeach him as well- people will believe him when he says he didn't know about it and had no hand in it.
Well, Pence was hated and a dead end career when Trump gave him the lifeboat of VP. Because Trump needed someone who had legitimate government experience to give him even the thinnest veneer of legitimacy.
There is the fact, though, Pence actually believes. He is a raging fundamentalist, sexist, and a homophobe but not necessarily a hypocrite.
Which oddly has always made me more afraid of him than Trump despite ostensibly sharing the same faith.
Edited by CharlesPhipps on Jul 31st 2018 at 3:34:26 AM
Author of The Rules of Supervillainy, Cthulhu Armageddon, and United States of Monsters.It's my understanding that it's more of a behaviour that criminal investigators like to encourage in the people they already have enough evidence to convict. Any actual evidence that the suspect provides during that phase allows them to get multiple people with one interrogation.
If you've got someone in custody that you know for a fact has robbed a bank and they tell you 'No, it was actually that guy, here's the proof!' and that checks out, you've just nabbed yourself an accomplice for free.
Angry gets shit done.![]()
![]()
The 'everything must be correct!' side of my brain compels me to point out that in the Prisoner's dilemma, both people get a reduced sentence if they don't roll on each other and a worse sentence if they both do.
What I'm talking about is someone rolling on another for the perceived rewards of going completely free while still unaware they're going to get the full punishment regardless of what they do.
Edited by Robrecht on Jul 31st 2018 at 3:45:16 AM
Angry gets shit done.
The Prisoner's dilemma only works if you TRUST the other person, though.
Which prisoners are inclined not to.
Trained organized crime tend to say nothing and get off better because of it but Trump's posse is not remotely loyal to one another and cowardly.
Author of The Rules of Supervillainy, Cthulhu Armageddon, and United States of Monsters.So this is a thing apparently.
And there's an actual reason they would mention that as well.
Edited by megaeliz on Jul 31st 2018 at 7:03:32 AM

Yes you irrelevant moron please sow discord within your camp
Edit: What a lovely page topper.
Edited by Fourthspartan56 on Jul 31st 2018 at 4:35:13 AM
"Einstein would turn over in his grave. Not only does God play dice, the dice are loaded." -Chairman Sheng-Ji Yang