TVTropes Now available in the app store!
Open

Follow TV Tropes

Following

The General US Politics Thread

Go To

Nov 2023 Mod notice:


There may be other, more specific, threads about some aspects of US politics, but this one tends to act as a hub for all sorts of related news and information, so it's usually one of the busiest OTC threads.

If you're new to OTC, it's worth reading the Introduction to On-Topic Conversations and the On-Topic Conversations debate guidelines before posting here.

Rumor-based, fear-mongering and/or inflammatory statements that damage the quality of the thread will be thumped. Off-topic posts will also be thumped. Repeat offenders may be suspended.

If time spent moderating this thread remains a distraction from moderation of the wiki itself, the thread will need to be locked. We want to avoid that, so please follow the forum rules when posting here.


In line with the general forum rules, 'gravedancing' is prohibited here. If you're celebrating someone's death or hoping that they die, your post will get thumped. This rule applies regardless of what the person you're discussing has said or done.

Edited by Mrph1 on Nov 30th 2023 at 11:03:59 AM

Silasw A procrastination in of itself from A handcart to hell (4 Score & 7 Years Ago) Relationship Status: And they all lived happily ever after <3
A procrastination in of itself
#183351: Apr 17th 2017 at 10:32:03 PM

See I don't think it was ever genuine anti-elite feelings turning into anti-intellectual feelings, it was always genuine anti-intellectual feelings being hidden behind a mask of anti-elite feelings.

When they said they were anti-elite they were lying, they were always anti-intellectual, there was no corruption because it was bad to begin with for the Trump movement.

“And the Bunny nails it!” ~ Gabrael “If the UN can get through a day without everyone strangling everyone else so can we.” ~ Cyran
M84 Oh, bother. from Our little blue planet Since: Jun, 2010 Relationship Status: Chocolate!
Oh, bother.
#183352: Apr 17th 2017 at 10:49:32 PM

[up] That's also possible. Either way, it boils down to people not liking experts telling them that the things they want aren't possible and/or will go horribly wrong.

After all (tying into [up][up][up]), how dare the out of touch "ivory tower" bookworms tell real hardworking blue-collar Americans what is and isn't a good idea!

@blkwhtrbbt

It is complete and utter hypocrisy to decry "elites" and then vote in Donald Trump.

I remember watching one of Obama's rallies during the campaign last year in which he pointed out that Trump was a hypocrite for claiming to be "anti-elite" when he has spent his entire life trying to be one of the global elites.

edited 17th Apr '17 10:59:26 PM by M84

Disgusted, but not surprised
Ramidel Since: Jan, 2001
#183353: Apr 17th 2017 at 11:38:57 PM

Re:Alaska, our problem hasn't been ballot access for a while, sadly. Our minority voters (specifically Alaska Natives in the villages) have long been pro-Republican, in part because Alaska Republicans have always firmly stood up for them (or specifically, for their organized interest groups like the Native Corporations).

Fortunately, that's starting to crack ever since Ted Stevens kicked off. Unfortunately, part of the reason it's cracking is that Lisa Murkowski isn't Ted Stevens and has been marching in lockstep with the Party.since he kicked off. (At the state level, Alaska is run by the last of the "moderate conservatives," and currently Alaska's House majority is a mixed Democrat-Republican-Independent coalition, I shit you not. But that hasn't translated into anything in Washington.)

Luigisan98 A wandering user from Venezuelan Muscat Since: Oct, 2013 Relationship Status: I <3 love!
A wandering user
#183354: Apr 17th 2017 at 11:47:03 PM

What makes these kind of people reject intellect?

The only good fanboy, is a redeemed fanboy.
MorningStar1337 The Encounter that ended the Dogma from 🤔 Since: Nov, 2012
The Encounter that ended the Dogma
#183355: Apr 17th 2017 at 11:52:41 PM

[up] Rebellion, Fear of technology, and fear of the unknown. Oh and for some that it often disproves their holy books as anything other than parables at best (See: Library of Alexandria), and for others often shows them that their current state of mind is Hell on Earth and that the leaders made it that way.

edited 17th Apr '17 11:55:19 PM by MorningStar1337

Luigisan98 A wandering user from Venezuelan Muscat Since: Oct, 2013 Relationship Status: I <3 love!
A wandering user
#183356: Apr 17th 2017 at 11:53:49 PM

Yeah, but what makes them associate intellectualism with minorities as well? Because it defies the so called "roles" in the world?

The only good fanboy, is a redeemed fanboy.
MadSkillz Destroyer of Worlds Since: Mar, 2013 Relationship Status: I only want you gone
Destroyer of Worlds
#183357: Apr 18th 2017 at 12:02:04 AM

Couldn't resist, could you?

The pot calling the kettle black.

Young people don't vote. Period. They've never once made the difference in an election and them staying home is business as usual. Most of those same young people couldn't be bothered to vote for him in the primaries.

They were important enough to make the difference in the general election.

Every time someone points out the racial issues with the Sanders campaign you retaliate with "young minorities liked him". And every time someone responds by pointing out that young people do not vote and that therefore who they like is utterly meaningless; they never turn out to the polls in any sort of numbers, and this election is no different in that regard.

You're taking it as a given that they won't vote and so we should ignore what and who they like thereby creating a self-fulfilling prophecy.

This is not a winning strategy.

Hell, your own statement includes the opinions of seventeen year olds, who literally cannot vote.

I know the laws of my land. You can vote in the primary if you can prove your birthday comes before the general election.

Ramidel Since: Jan, 2001
#183358: Apr 18th 2017 at 12:07:15 AM

I think it's the fascist identification of the Working Class Action Hero. Fascists lionize Joe Sixpack while creating a racial "team" to play for and enemies to play against. And their Joe Sixpack values hard work over thinking, which incidentally means that fascists can draw a line against "ivory tower intellectuals" who don't understand the working class and don't share their values. And to be fair, minority rights in the US were imposed on the Deep South by "liberal Northern elites" against the will of the existing white population. It's a good thing, but you can't reasonably expect them to agree with the change or forgive the people who they see as responsible.

In America, combine that with how rural Christians often look at colleges and cities as hotbeds of sin, and you've got fertile ground for a Know-Nothing Party.

edited 18th Apr '17 12:09:18 AM by Ramidel

MadSkillz Destroyer of Worlds Since: Mar, 2013 Relationship Status: I only want you gone
Destroyer of Worlds
#183359: Apr 18th 2017 at 12:12:27 AM

It's weird how you guys define anti-elitism especially since most of us belong to at least one camp of anti-elites.

We have to define who the elite are first and every group has a different definition:

Alt-right- the Jews

The left- Corporations

The other left- Old White Men

The right- Intellectuals/ Corrupt politicians/coastal elites

Ramidel Since: Jan, 2001
#183360: Apr 18th 2017 at 12:15:38 AM

To be honest, it's easier to unite a group based on what they're against than what they're for. That's part of why the right can usually hold things together much better than the Judean People's Front/People's Front of Judea mess on the left, because radicals are generally for something and they don't get along very well with people who are for something that differs in some key way.

MadSkillz Destroyer of Worlds Since: Mar, 2013 Relationship Status: I only want you gone
Destroyer of Worlds
#183361: Apr 18th 2017 at 1:29:25 AM

And you know going back to anti-intellectualism, there is a point to be made that we do have a subservient intellectual class that's willing to rubber stamp ideas that benefit the rich. Control of thought isn't new.

If you can buy a politician, why can't you buy an intellectual? Is that really that rare?

That said, I think anti-intellectualism from the right stems from a different place than corruption.

SeptimusHeap from Switzerland (Edited uphill both ways) Relationship Status: Mu
#183362: Apr 18th 2017 at 1:32:39 AM

I suspect that you can't "buy" an intellectual because a lot of time there isn't any "buying" going on, just manipulation. And that does not work so well there.

"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard Feynman
MadSkillz Destroyer of Worlds Since: Mar, 2013 Relationship Status: I only want you gone
Destroyer of Worlds
#183363: Apr 18th 2017 at 1:36:27 AM

Well look at the scientists that deny climate change for example that Fox News cites at times.

You can't explain that in any other way. I doubt they're true believers.

M84 Oh, bother. from Our little blue planet Since: Jun, 2010 Relationship Status: Chocolate!
Oh, bother.
#183364: Apr 18th 2017 at 1:37:17 AM

[up][up] Case in point: pharma companies don't so much buy off doctors with bribes as they do send reps who slowly gain the doctors' trust and appreciation by acting friendly and maybe occaisonally buying them a lunch. So when the doctor needs to prescribe a patient with something, their mind then drifts to said rep's company.

It's even more insidious than simple bribery.

[up] Ironically, it's the right bribing and manipulating said scientists. Classic psychological projection of their own doings on to the opposition. "We bribe scientists, so the lefties must be doing it too!" See also: the "think-tanks" that advocate trickle-down economics.

edited 18th Apr '17 1:41:02 AM by M84

Disgusted, but not surprised
MorningStar1337 The Encounter that ended the Dogma from 🤔 Since: Nov, 2012
The Encounter that ended the Dogma
#183365: Apr 18th 2017 at 1:41:04 AM

[up] Shouldn't the bribed be investigated then? I doubt the scientific community would take such a compromise of integrity sitting down.

edited 18th Apr '17 1:41:25 AM by MorningStar1337

MadSkillz Destroyer of Worlds Since: Mar, 2013 Relationship Status: I only want you gone
Destroyer of Worlds
#183366: Apr 18th 2017 at 1:49:21 AM

Shouldn't the bribed be investigated then? I doubt the scientific community would take such a compromise of integrity sitting down.

Shouldn't Mike Pence be investigated?

He's literally taking tobacco money and then saying smoking doesn't kill.

You think too highly of scientific integrity. It's higher than political integrity though.

edited 18th Apr '17 1:50:05 AM by MadSkillz

M84 Oh, bother. from Our little blue planet Since: Jun, 2010 Relationship Status: Chocolate!
Oh, bother.
#183367: Apr 18th 2017 at 1:49:22 AM

[up][up] It's usually not bribing an independent think-tank — it's more funding your own think-tank staffed with individuals who have similar political leanings and an understanding that if they want more funding they will provide results you can use.

For example, there was a "study" done to test if faith healing via prayer actually worked. The results weren't what they wanted (prayer apparently made things worse), so they dismissed them.

The scientific community is usually left to "police" their own via peer-review and falsifiability. It's up to the public to look up the community's judgement. Too bad some of them simply look up the stuff that panders to their world-view, peer-review be damned.

Example: A climate-change denier or anti-vaxxer ignores the thousands of Google-hits of studies showing their views are bullshit and prints out the scant handful of quack studies that support them.

Plenty of scientists have called out the likes of Andrew Wakefield as frauds. It's just that too many people aren't willing to listen to them because Wakefield's "studies" pander to their world-view.

edited 18th Apr '17 2:17:23 AM by M84

Disgusted, but not surprised
SeptimusHeap from Switzerland (Edited uphill both ways) Relationship Status: Mu
#183368: Apr 18th 2017 at 2:18:36 AM

Some topic change: Serious design, construction and maintenance defects doomed Oroville Dam, report says. To whit:

  • The concrete floor of the main spillway was too thin and not reinforced with steel.
  • There was not enough anchoring for the spillway floor, making it liable to down- and sideward movements.
  • The failure started at a point above a clay drainage pipe, where the floor of the main spillway was extremely thin.
  • Said drain was probably blocked by vegetation, allowing water to accumulate beneath and "float" the spillway floor. This may not have been relevant in the onset of the crisis, though.

Not sure how legitimate concerns about "national security" are though - dams are very "hard" targets and thus generally not favoured. That might apply more to a concrete arch-gravity dam like Hoover than an embankment dam like Oroville, though.

"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard Feynman
Krieger22 Causing freakouts over sourcing since 2018 from Malaysia Since: Mar, 2014 Relationship Status: I'm in love with my car
Causing freakouts over sourcing since 2018
#183369: Apr 18th 2017 at 3:47:27 AM

"You think too highly of scientific integrity": Is this the prelude to some rant about dialectical sciences and how Lysenkoism is the future?

In Which Tankie Gabbard refuses to condemn Steve Bannon, and the moderator silenced the constituent's follow up.

True Comrade.

I have disagreed with her a lot, but comparing her to republicans and propagandists of dictatorships is really low. - An idiot
M84 Oh, bother. from Our little blue planet Since: Jun, 2010 Relationship Status: Chocolate!
Oh, bother.
#183370: Apr 18th 2017 at 4:09:39 AM

[up] And Gabbard is supposed to be a "progressive"?!

edited 18th Apr '17 4:10:06 AM by M84

Disgusted, but not surprised
megaeliz Since: Mar, 2017
#183371: Apr 18th 2017 at 4:24:48 AM

Someone stole voting machines in Georgia right before the special election.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/thinkprogress.org/amp/p/b57a97493db6

TrashJack Confirmed Doomer from beyond the Despair Event Horizon (4 Score & 7 Years Ago)
Confirmed Doomer
#183372: Apr 18th 2017 at 4:37:05 AM

[up][up][up] Is there some way we can get the Democratic Party to denounce Gabbard, possibly even kick her right out of the party? It's not like she's in a swing or red state, so we don't exactly need her specifically.

"Cynic, n. — A blackguard whose faulty vision sees things as they are, not as they ought to be." - The Devil's Dictionary
Silasw A procrastination in of itself from A handcart to hell (4 Score & 7 Years Ago) Relationship Status: And they all lived happily ever after <3
A procrastination in of itself
#183373: Apr 18th 2017 at 4:41:37 AM

You can't be kicked out of political parties in the US, they're not like actual organisations, more affiliations you can choose to declare.

“And the Bunny nails it!” ~ Gabrael “If the UN can get through a day without everyone strangling everyone else so can we.” ~ Cyran
SeptimusHeap from Switzerland (Edited uphill both ways) Relationship Status: Mu
#183374: Apr 18th 2017 at 5:01:41 AM

You can primary them.

"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard Feynman
CenturyEye Tell Me, Have You Seen the Yellow Sign? from I don't know where the Yith sent me this time... Since: Jan, 2017 Relationship Status: Having tea with Cthulhu
Tell Me, Have You Seen the Yellow Sign?
#183375: Apr 18th 2017 at 5:59:08 AM

The comments to that Gabbard story give a little perspective on how she has support. (Be wary, tis a sample size of about four supporters—on twitter). note 

Tulsi refuses to name-call & you guys just spit on her. She, as a person of color, has already denounced white supremacy as pure evil. Shame

No. It's the neoliberal warmongers who are on Trump's side wanting more regime-change wars that will kill thousand of babies. Not Tulsi.

No. Tulsi's a progressive Dem fighting bad policies like an adult.

Tulsi's a person of color who has denounced white supremacy as pure evil. She fights against bad policy, not engages in personal attacks.

Tulsi is being an adult. It's disgusting how @DNC Party shills keep throwing her under the bus.

Throwing in with Assad because she met with him? All she wants is evidence. Which we should all want right?

You don't hold a monopoly on the 1st amendment. She'd be the first to call for his prosecution if independent evidence showed he was guilty...She supports peace, not Assad. Doesn't want Syria to become another Iraq war.

In essence, the standard of proof to discredit her progressive credentials is very high for reasons unknown. Add in a bit of deflection and a persecution complex, and she's apparently a stand-up rep. Probably on the short list to be president some day.

Look with century eyes... With our backs to the arch And the wreck of our kind We will stare straight ahead For the rest of our lives

Total posts: 417,856
Top