Nov 2023 Mod notice:
There may be other, more specific, threads about some aspects of US politics, but this one tends to act as a hub for all sorts of related news and information, so it's usually one of the busiest OTC threads.
If you're new to OTC, it's worth reading the Introduction to On-Topic Conversations
and the On-Topic Conversations debate guidelines
before posting here.
Rumor-based, fear-mongering and/or inflammatory statements that damage the quality of the thread will be thumped. Off-topic posts will also be thumped. Repeat offenders may be suspended.
If time spent moderating this thread remains a distraction from moderation of the wiki itself, the thread will need to be locked. We want to avoid that, so please follow the forum rules
when posting here.
In line with the general forum rules, 'gravedancing' is prohibited here. If you're celebrating someone's death or hoping that they die, your post will get thumped. This rule applies regardless of what the person you're discussing has said or done.
Edited by Mrph1 on Nov 30th 2023 at 11:03:59 AM
x5 Good. I've been seeing disturbing parallels to 1984 in the last few years, but especially since Trump was elected.
[New Republic] The founder of Blackwater is now part of the Trump-Russia story because of course he is
. And a probably more reliable confirmation by The Washington Post
.
EDIT: Just remembered, Yesterday, when I mentioned Bannon's Egypt connenctions
I joked next scandal of someone in the Trump Admin collaborating with a foreign power would be related to Devos and what do you know? This guy's Devos' brother. I'm guessing next in line is Mnuchin, just for the lulz.
edited 4th Apr '17 6:44:35 AM by IFwanderer
1 2 We are what we pretend to be, so we must be careful about what we pretend to be. -KVDem lawmaker Swalwell makes his name in Russia probe
http://thehill.com/homenews/house/327108-dem-lawmaker-swalwell-makes-his-name-in-russia-probe
?
Edit
How Trump plans to gut the EPA
http://www.vox.com/platform/amp/energy-and-environment/2017/4/4/15161156/new-budget-documents-trump-gut-epa
edited 4th Apr '17 7:07:59 AM by megaeliz
The group has been particularly active in the north Atlanta suburbs as of late, sinking $2.2 million into radio and television ads against Ossoff. Now it’s out with a new digital spot this morning deeming the 30-year-old a “rubber stamp” for Pelosi’s “extreme agenda” while also taking a new swipe at the Democrat’s resume.
“Bigger government, more spending, higher taxes, a weaker military,” the ad states. “Liberal Jon Ossoff. He’s with Pelosi, not us.”
A recent Leadership Fund survey estimated that Pelosi held a net favorability rating of negative 40 percent in the Georgia 6th. The group is banking that those numbers will hold when voters hit the polls on April 18, at least enough so to deny Ossoff the 50 percent of the vote needed to draw him into a two-month runoff.
in a recent memo obtained by Insider, the super PAC said its offensive is beginning to change the political dynamics in the final weeks of the race.
The group cites a self-commissioned survey that found that Ossoff’s standing in the polls has remained more or less unchanged in the latter half of March, from 37 percent mid-month to 36 percent last week. They also highlight that more voters now see the Democrat in an unfavorable light than before they ramped up their advertising.
Writes Corry Bliss, the group’s executive director:
- “In just one week, Ossoff has stalled on the ballot, and most importantly, he is now underwater with more voters viewing him unfavorably (38% favorable, 47% unfavorable). This is a large swing from last week when he was +17 (43% favorable, 26% unfavorable).”
The Congressional Leadership Fund, or CLF, is not the only outside GOP group to use Pelosi, the House Democratic Leader, to nationalize the 6th District race, which is seen as an early referendum on Donald Trump’s young presidency. The National Republican Congressional Committee warned in a recent ad that “Nancy Pelosi and liberal politicians are flooding into Georgia to try and stop our Republican majority that’s getting things done.”
One interesting nugget from the survey is that a plurality of respondents, 44 percent to 37 percent, think Ossoff “will hold Donald Trump accountable,” one of the Democrat’s biggest campaign pledges.
A Democratic victory in the reliably Republican 6th District would be a major upset — the seat has been in GOP hands since the 1970s.
Ossoff... has led the crowded, 18-person field with roughly 40 percent in recent polls.
@I Fwanderer, I don't remember signing up for Tom Clancy's Wild Ride but let me off and give me my money back.
Politics is the skilled use of blunt objects.Dude, megaelz, you don't need to keep double posting. Just edit your previous posts.
![]()
Considering that he's holding that much in a jungle primary, I think he might well be able to win a run off election. Did anyone even think it wasn't going to end up in a run off anyway? Let's hope Ossoff is at least mentally prepared for it.
Well, the GOP field is split between about 11 candidates (more like 10 since one of the tea partiers had her staff resign en masse). The Dem field has about 4 with three doing little more than spoiling Ossoff. (He might be over 50% if they dropped out.)
The 6th isn't Atlanta, it's Marietta and the Northern Suburbs—a very different place. There's always the likelihood the suburban voters will rally around the GOP when its mano a mano. Less risky to hit a knock out blow in the first place.
Edit: Done and done
edited 4th Apr '17 7:29:09 AM by CenturyEye
Look with century eyes... With our backs to the arch And the wreck of our kind We will stare straight ahead For the rest of our livesNew GOP Health Proposal Would Undermine Essential Benefits, Pre-existing Conditions
"States would have the option to jettison two major parts of the Affordable Care Act’s insurance regulations. They could decide to opt out of provisions that require insurers to cover a standard, minimum package of benefits, known as the essential health benefits. And they could decide to do away with a rule that requires insurance companies to charge the same price to everyone who is the same age, a provision called community rating."
"Technically, the deal would still prevent insurers from denying coverage to people with a history of illness. But without community rating, health plans would be free to charge those patients as much as they wanted."
So it's worse than Trump Doesn'tCare 1 because of course it is.
I thought it was mano a mano: "man to man". mano y mano means "man and man". I suspect linguistic drift, since most English users of the phrase don't know Spanish and therefore cannot identify the mistranslation.
Hey, maybe if they keep throwing the same bad ideas at the wall, some of them will stick enough to pass a vote?
edited 4th Apr '17 7:23:46 AM by Fighteer
"It's Occam's Shuriken! If the answer is elusive, never rule out ninjas!"![]()
![]()
Huh, impressive. He won't let one humiliating failure stop him from screwing over millions of people. That's the Spirit we need in a president!
Might still have a hard time passing this one too though...Is Trump now part of the establishment?
Last year Mr Trump and members of the House Freedom Caucus, a collection of 30 or so libertarian-leaning fiscal conservatives in Congress, were singing from the same anti-government hymnal.
Now, however, Mr Trump is the government - and he teamed up with congressional leadership to back a healthcare bill that conservative hard-liners believe didn't go far enough in undoing the 2009 Democratic-designed system.
The effort's failure set off back-and-forth sniping between Mr Trump and the Freedom Caucus that morphed into a classic insider-outsider faceoff, with Mr Trump cast as the new voice of the powers that be.
Congressman Justin Amash said the White House has become part of the hated status quo - the "Trumpstablishment", he called it in a Saturday tweet.
That line drew the ire of Mr Trump's director of social media, Dan Scavino Jr, who tweeted that Mr Amash was a "big liability" and encouraged Michigan voters to unseat him in next year's Republican primary. (The tweet has since been criticised as a possible violation of a federal law preventing executive branch officials from attempting to influence election campaigns.)
Already there are signs that conservative true-believers - some of whom were never fully sold on Mr Trump to begin with - are questioning Mr Trump's anti-establishment bona fides.
"That's the dirty little secret," writes conservative columnist Ben Shapiro. "Trump isn't anti-establishment; he's pro-establishment so long as he's the establishment."
Even conservative radio host Laura Ingraham, an early Trump supporter, is having some doubts.
In a Rasmussen survey, the number of Americans who "strongly approve" of the president has dropped from 44% at shortly after his inauguration to 28% today. While the Republican base is largely sticking with Mr Trump so far, they may be starting to have some doubts.
edited 4th Apr '17 7:28:36 AM by CenturyEye
Look with century eyes... With our backs to the arch And the wreck of our kind We will stare straight ahead For the rest of our livesGoddammit, I knew it meant "hand to hand", but for some reason I brain farted. Spanish classes, ye were too long ago. Just goes to show how cognates screw you up.
Yes, that's the other thing. Any time someone rails against "the establishment", you can be fairly sure what they mean is "people who are in the system, while I am outside it". Of course, this can be relative. Those Freedom Caucus members are "inside the system" — they are elected to Congress, after all. They have staffs, entertain lobbyists, adhere to procedures (well, mostly). They are politicians whether they like it or not.
edited 4th Apr '17 7:34:39 AM by Fighteer
"It's Occam's Shuriken! If the answer is elusive, never rule out ninjas!"As part of a CNN special report on the impact the wall between the U.S. and Mexico will have on border dwellers in the state that went overwhelmingly for President Donald Trump, the network found there is already an extensive history of government lawsuits filed to take property from homeowners. With Trump’s wall planned for the entire border, some of his supporters are now saying they will fight his administration in the courts.
According to one family who had their farm cut in half — part of it in the U.S., part of it in Mexico — they are still stunned that government was able to take their property 10 years ago.
“I was very angry, I just kept saying, how can they do that? How is that possible in the United States that they can do this?” D’Ann Loop of Brownsville recalled. “They put up a fence in front of our land and then keep us in here — lock us in. I didn’t understand. I was very — I was floored and flabbergasted.”
LMAO
M
A
O
edited 4th Apr '17 7:42:21 AM by TacticalFox88
New Survey coming this weekend!The wall is and always has been an idiot's dream.
"It's Occam's Shuriken! If the answer is elusive, never rule out ninjas!"Madskillz...don't cite that stupid video of "Oh, Bernie Sanders won over Trump voters by talking to them!" Not everything can be solved by a decent chat about healthcare. One stupid moment of "But he got some cheers" does not mean they'll vote for him in a general election.
Seriously, this notion you can subtract things like race and environmentalism from West Virginia...
McConnell to file cloture on Gorsuch nomination due to filibuster.
